Player Watch Izak Rankine Part II

[Tadpole]

I’m Rankine this as a serviceable trade period so far. We got our man, so I’m a happy bunny.

 

[clinto69]

3 years is a good outcome for us I think.

 

[Danger in Texas]

Edmund and Goddard speechless on Trade Radio lol

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Not a complete disaster but still think that Reid failed to get decent value out of the trade.

 

[FR0GGY]

Edmund and Goddard speechless on Trade Radio lol

For what reason?

 

[Crow-eater]

The 3 year deal just puts every media personality in the mud. Everyone was saying 4/5 year deal.

Hilarious.

 

[Danger in Texas]

For what reason?

Three year deal. A bit of ‘how could everyone have gotten that one wrong?!’ about it

 

[Drewie11]

Another Justin Reid masterclass.
Incredibly poor outcome.

Why?

 

[arrowman]

He has to do 7 years with us to be a free agent, when you change clubs it resets, doesn't it?

Ah, of course. I guess it's a case of (for him) - decent money now, megabucks on his next contract assuming he lives up to expectations.

 

[whattagun07]

I said at the start i'd be happy to part with 5 for Rankine. Sure I would have loved to get him for free in PSD, but I guess that was a pipe dream.

Anyone in any doubt about Rankine, just watch his highlight clips. He will be ELITE.

I have no doubt that he will run through the midfield, particularly centre bounce attendances.

Even if he doesn't have a huge tank, get him in the guts for a centre clearance, and he'll break away, run to 50, and drill it through the sticks, or down Fog's throat

 

[Bearded Clam]

For what reason?

Probably because they werent told about a trade that occurred hours ago!..

These trade radio flogs probably think they are so important that they should be the first to know and its their right to break the news..

 

[Samcro24]

Three year deal. A bit of ‘how could everyone have gotten that one wrong?!’ about it

Maybe, just maybe they got the $$$ wrong too.

Clowns

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Three year deal. A bit of ‘how could everyone have gotten that one wrong?!’ about it

puts serious question marks on the dollar amount suggested.

 

[Mr MysteryGuest]

Did anyone else notice that for the article on the AFC website, we put a red circle and arrows around the word "Home", like it was a youtube thumbnail?

 

[Scorpus]

Not sure how to feel about giving up pick 5 for a player we only have on a 3 year deal

 

[WaynesWorld19]

Not sure how to feel about giving up pick 5 for a player we only have on a 3 year deal

Contracts are irrelevant in the AFL anyway

 

[Smoooothy]

puts serious question marks on the dollar amount suggested.

i'd guess its at nowhere near the amount speculated. hopefully 2 mill for 3 years type territory which is miles better

 

[Mutineer]

Excellent and IMO a fair price for an elite talent.

Welcome Izak.

 

[LeftyLuke]

puts serious question marks on the dollar amount suggested.

Everyone knew they were making it up. It's what Hutchy's minions are instructed to do. Never let the truth get in the way of a made up story.

 

[Crow till I die]

Not sure how to feel about giving up pick 5 for a player we only have on a 3 year deal

I am with you as I would have preferred it to be a long term deal and would love to know why it was only a 3 year deal

 

[relapse]

I’m Rankine this as a serviceable trade period so far. We got our man, so I’m a happy bunny.

 

[Rise_up_Stiffy]

So stoked. Rankine and Rachele......so good

 

[JamFancy]

Has the article been removed from afc.com.au?

 

[texanmike]

Has the article been removed from afc.com.au?

rofl it has haha, someone on the media team fked that up

 

[dogs105]

Should I be nervous that the club has taken the story down?