- Jun 14, 2015
- 17,961
- 39,108
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Port Adelaide Power
He should be sacked for his part in driving a man to the edge of death.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He should be sacked for his part in driving a man to the edge of death.
Not justifying the media's approach but allow me to spend 500 words justifying it. No body's complaining that the media shouldn't have reported the story, the entirety of the complaint is about the media's approach.
I justified their reporting, but didn't excuse the camping on the lawn bit. It was made pretty clear.
Lol
1. I bet you wouldn't. There's a reason you're chest puffing online anonymously
2. So verbal busy doesn't exist to you
3. Your grasp on the law is non existent
None of that responds to any of my comments to you
Can you please read what's written and respond in kind. It's far too hot to have to decipher random postsI'll give you a hint, I have been verbally abused when I was in my teens (and I'm now over 50). So yeh, I know what it can be liked.
Why don't we go back to the root cause and stop treating the symptoms?
And no, vans parked out the front of his house aren't appropriate but don't use the innocent angel in any of this - Hird and his lawyer team are just as culpable in this all occurring - it takes two to tango!
It was personal. There doesn't have to be a direct accusation or a verbal assault to be personal. Lack of balanced reporting and extreme inconsistency can result in being singled out, and that's personal.Not justifying the media's approach in terms of camping out the front of his family home - but a reality check is needed for many including yourself and Graham Cornes.
Very little, if any, of the media coverage regarding Hird was actually personal.
It was all focused on his role in the doping program, and his subsequent course of action in the aftermath.
His wife went to the media to throw Demetriou under the bus.
His dad used the media on a daily basis to plead his case.
Hird himself had an open mike interview which he instigated himself.
So not all the media coverage was a case of the media hounding him.
Let's be clear about that and not rewrite history.
Regarding the nature of the media coverage of Hird - as far as I recall, it was all pretty much focused on whether or not he, professionally, held some responsibility for the doping program, and what professional consequences should be faced as a result.
It wasn't personal.
Hird told us, many times, via the media, he was innocent and did nothing wrong. He told us that when the truth came out, it'd all be cool.
He had many, many opportunities to tell this truth. He even, via the media, set up an interview to do just that.
But we got nuthin'.
Rightly, the media pushed back.
That's not harassment or vilification. It's the media engaging with a high profile person in s high profile scenario when he says he'll clear his name - then over a 2-3 year period comes up with zilch.
It's the media, and the public, calling bullshit. And rightly so.
The media had an obligation to get something from Hird.
Harrassing his family is not on. But unfortunately, once your wife does her own 'tell all' via the media - she's kind of checked into the game.
The AFL and Essendon paying him whilst suspended, was a sham we weren't meant to know about. But Hird, via the media, tried to embarrass the AFL by leaking it out.
It made his junket in France of public interest. The Essendon members were paying for it after all.
I've said this before, and I'll say it again - this saga will never be over until those involved come clean and stop bullshitting.
And as long as Dank, Hird, Essendon, the players and the AFL keep trying to hope it goes away by lying, weaseling and deflecting - the main players are always going to be under the pump. Rightly or wrongly.
People don't like being bullshitted to - and Hird has bullshitted from day 1.
No he should earn his way back in ala Carey etcI note this afternoon Steph Hird...the eldest of the children, has felt the need to make a public statement. Steph is 16 going on 17.
For me, I hope that once Hird has been successfully treated, he should be welcomed back, with open arms, into the football community and n ot just Essendon. Sure Essendon could see fit to have him on the club board. No-one would oppose that.
The lack of comment from the AFL so far has been to be brutally honest, pathetic. Just another slap down for Gillon, Fitzpatrick et al. (Who were so quick with Franklin, Cousins and etc)
Yeah a decade or so would need to pass before he'd even have the slimmest chance of returning.Absolutely no chance. Hird has way too much stink on him. He'll never be involved in the football industry ever again and rightly so
I have Essendon mates who would be furious if Hird ended up back at the club.
As harsh as it is, he is done in the industry
Carey should never have been welcomed back. Its a joke that he is allowed to feature on channel 7.No he should earn his way back in ala Carey etc
That's how most people will feel if Hird is ever brought back in.Carey should never have been welcomed back. Its a joke that he is allowed to feature on channel 7.
If that's the case most people are very stupid. Organising a "doping program" at a sporting club to get an unfair advantage, would cause the same feeling as someone glassing a womanThat's how most people will feel if Hird is ever brought back in.
How do we know for sure this anything to do with footy?
I'm not sure there is anyone in here saying any different, is there? Most if not all, have said they think the media should leave the family alone, and certainly shouldn't be camped out his front gate like vultures.Not justifying the media's approach but allow me to spend 500 words justifying it. No body's complaining that the media shouldn't have reported the story, the entirety of the complaint is about the media's approach.
Gee, we can't all be perfect like you, Westicle.
I hope, one day, you do stuff up and hurt someone, and they refuse to forgive you, no matter how often you say "sorry". Then you will see what unforgiveness looks like.
To err is human.
Ultimately I question whether it even matters. In the end, if someone is in a dark place and so down that they would contemplate self-harm, make an attempt on their life or even just send out a call for help by ODing without going all the way, that should be the overwhelming concern. Their welfare.A very good question.
Since when do you have to have high moral fibre to work in the media. They're still on Tania's lawn aren't they?Carey should never have been welcomed back. Its a joke that he is allowed to feature on channel 7.
I'm not sure there is anyone in here saying any different, is there? Most if not all, have said they think the media should leave the family alone, and certainly shouldn't be camped out his front gate like vultures.
I don't often agree with you Doss, but on this I agree 100%. Which is why I think his friends/family need to circle the wagons and give the press nothing. Publically pointing fingers about who is to blame is only going to get people off side. The why isn't so important at the moment. That can be addressed down the track. That is what I've been trying to say in previous posts, but I think it got lost in translation.Ultimately I question whether it even matters. In the end, if someone is in a dark place and so down that they would contemplate self-harm, make an attempt on their life or even just send out a call for help by ODing without going all the way, that should be the overwhelming concern. Their welfare.
The causing factors don't ultimately change the fact someone needs help. And, looking at those people camped outside his house, that they need to be left alone and given the privacy they need.
Jenny, I don't really think Amendola coming out and saying what he did achieves much good either, but I think you know as well as I do that for many there will never be a 'down the track'. People don't want to hear it, ever.I don't often agree with you Doss, but on this I agree 100%. Which is why I think his friends/family need to circle the wagons and give the press nothing. Publically pointing fingers about who is to blame is only going to get people off side. The why isn't so important at the moment. That can be addressed down the track. That is what I've been trying to say in previous posts, but I think it got lost in translation.
I'm not sure this is the right place for this conversation, but I just want to say this. For every article calling for Hird to stand down (which, honestly, was the correct call at the time), there was at least another that said he shouldn't. For every article that pointed out under the letter of the WADA code the players should be banned, there was at least one that said they were duped and had no case to answer. There were certainly some pretty nasty opinion pieces written, and unfortunately that is the era in which we live. Gone are the days when journalists researched and reported the facts. Hird did himself no favours though. But that has been written about in depth, and serves no purpose to discuss further here.Sure and they follow up with stuff like why didn't Hird just tell his story to them. Even though he repeatedly said he can't talk about confidential items under investigation, which is a perfectly reasonable position to take.
So much of his behavior that people constantly lambaste him for only exists because of the prism of constant coverage and the media pressuring him to step down. Agreeing with the position of media harassment should lead people to acknowledge the existence of and understand the ramifications of that prism.