Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
There is no point trading him with Hille as they are very similar. Along with that, laycock was beaten in the ruck by Ackland. The worst main ruckman in the league. Laycock is not good enough in the ruck to be a main ruckman.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Agree bomberbilly. don't listen to Hamish, he's a dingbatgee someone with the name "David_Hilley#19" saying laycock is not good enough to be our #1 ruckman.... not being biased perhaps?laycock was voted as best on ground by the coaches so I think he did pretty well in the ruck as well as very well around the ground. hille is the worst tap ruckman in the league yet he is quite good around the ground and up forward. Laycock actually gets his hand first on the ball and palms it to our midfielders advantage he will only get better with more experience.
Agree bomberbilly. don't listen to Hamish, he's a dingbat
Laycock, along with his great palming potential basically as a 4th midfielder in the centre. He had the most clearances of any player on the ground in the weekend. A superb effeot. He's a similar breed to Cox yet has that extra ability, roving his own tap and clearing. Trade Hille for another quick midfielder or hard-nosed one, like an out-of-contract Col Sylvia![]()
Charman isn't gettable, but Cameron Wood is and imo he will become a fantastic Ruckman.
Shit this all sounds familar i said this 2 f****** months ago that Jaime Charman is a much better ruckmen than Hille, but no all u guys were saying Hille is good value and is one of the best ruckmen in the comp....Tell me guys where is he now...Oh yeah thats right he is at Bendigo where he f****** belongs.
There is no point trading him with Hille as they are very similar. Along with that, laycock was beaten in the ruck by Ackland. The worst main ruckman in the league. Laycock is not good enough in the ruck to be a main ruckman.
That to me sounds like the sweet dulcet tones of you losing all credibility. Laycock was voted best on ground by both Sheedy and Rutten. He was very good, and was nowehere near beaten by Ackland. Laycock is on the verge of surpasing Hille as our number 1 ruckman.
As for the trade, I would prefer Cameron Wood. Exciting young prospect and Brissie probably dont need him after the emergence of Leunberger.
That to me sounds like the sweet dulcet tones of you losing all credibility. Laycock was voted best on ground by both Sheedy and Rutten. He was very good, and was nowehere near beaten by Ackland. Laycock is on the verge of surpasing Hille as our number 1 ruckman.
As for the trade, I would prefer Cameron Wood. Exciting young prospect and Brissie probably dont need him after the emergence of Leunberger.
Ackland still had more hitouts than Laycock. Not a good sign when you can't get more tap outs than Hackland.
Sheeds and Rutten giving him BOG... now that was funny.
Id rather take a ruckman with promise and that will develop ahead of Charman any day.
Agree with SOT4, Cameron Wood wouldn't be a bad pick-up at all
Number 1 draft pick thanks![]()
He was easily B.O.G
So what are your thoughts on picking up Charman?
Hes 25 and has at least 5+ years in him. Hes played in a Preimership and has alot of finals experice.
Where as Hille I can't seeing him getting any better then he is now and I would rather Charman in the team where he could teach the young midfield around him to get the clearances and win more of the ball. I think our midfield would improve so much with the likes of Charman as our ruck.
So what do you guys think and what would they want for him?