Yea I'm not gonna melt over this I'd rather keep him but I'm not sure he's a guy I want on inflated coin or longer than a 3 year term with his foot history.. we are due to lose someone decent it's been awhile.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Nah, mic is cooked = worthlessThis might belong in the Unpopular Opinions thread, but I'd rather we let go of the microwave to free up cash for Polly.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Particularly over 5 yrs....but football is a business and Polly has every right as does Port to get the best deal possible...time to trade from a position of strength..I'm no list manager but $600k seems about right for Polec.
$750k is way too much..
He will play until he is 33 recognised as one of the absolute best around.I'm excited. Well get a good pick and hopefully land a bloke who runs both ways.
Extremely talented but if I was North, be very careful with him dropping right off once he signs that contract.
Do you truly believe we are so much closer than North to a premiership?If he is not prepared to take reasonable money to be part of a premiership then so be it.
Channel 7 will be happy, I imagine it will cover the first 10 pages of the Advertiser also.
'cos your club seems to think he is worth more?WHY would we trade any more than a first rounder for Polec?
Your club considers him a 500k per year player. The value there just doesn't represent anything more than a first rounder.

It's not what we're willing to pay him, it's what you are....WHY would we trade any more than a first rounder for Polec?
Your club considers him a 500k per year player. The value there just doesn't represent anything more than a first rounder.
I agree with this, but we are losing someone who would be our best midfielder if Voss let him be.Guess what guys, the trade period that Polec will leave in is the same one that we can gain quick, pacey, skillful players too. Its only a hole if we allow it to be.
WHY would we trade any more than a first rounder for Polec?
Your club considers him a 500k per year player. The value there just doesn't represent anything more than a first rounder.
WHY would we trade any more than a first rounder for Polec?
Your club considers him a 500k per year player. The value there just doesn't represent anything more than a first rounder.
WHY would we trade any more than a first rounder for Polec?
Your club considers him a 500k per year player. The value there just doesn't represent anything more than a first rounder.
'cos your club seems to think he is worth more?![]()
“Port offering 3 years @ $500k”
Can pretty much gaurentee our first rounder (9-13) will get the deal done.
Come back when you can spellCan pretty much gaurentee our first rounder (9-13) will get the deal done.
Let him go. He isn't that quick and skills are hit and miss. Seems like he is mentally already there.
He would want to hope that foot holds up.
Can pretty much gaurentee our first rounder (9-13) will get the deal done.