Remove this Banner Ad

Current Jeffrey Epstein - * Prince Andrew is stripped of title & evicted from residence

Who killed Jeffrey Epstein?

  • He killed himself

    Votes: 16 11.6%
  • Rank incompetence enabled his suicide

    Votes: 24 17.4%
  • Bill Clinton

    Votes: 34 24.6%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 24 17.4%
  • The Russians

    Votes: 2 1.4%
  • The Saudis

    Votes: 3 2.2%
  • MI5/6 - British Royals

    Votes: 24 17.4%
  • Ghislane Maxwell

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Someone's Dad

    Votes: 10 7.2%

  • Total voters
    138

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

How does this email prove anything?
I wouldn't be taken anything emailed by Epstein or GMax as being the whole truth.
There MO was clearly to compromise powerful people, and people of influence (past, present,future).

Falsely implicating Trump, or insinuating that Virginia Giuffre was a victim (back then) of Trump's, is an easy trap to fall into, what with Trump's reputation over the years and what we now know about him.

Using the word 'Victim' (for Virginia) in the redacted emails, could in itself cause a whole heap of legal issues and upcoming pain for those that did the redaction wording, seeing as how at this point there is no evidence that Virginia was ever a victim of Trumps.
 
THE EPSTEIN FILES BREAK OPEN: Inside Today’s Release, the 218th Vote, and the White House Panic
...
By Brian Allen

1. What Was Released Today

The DOJ’s new disclosure includes:

  • Flight logs
  • Epstein’s redacted “black book”
  • His list of “masseuses” (mostly young women)
  • FBI evidence inventories
  • Emails from Epstein’s estate
...'
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad


'Press Release Published: Nov 12, 2025

Oversight Committee Releases Additional Epstein Estate Documents

WASHINGTON—The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform released an additional 20,000 pages of documents received from the estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The documents can be found here.
A backup of the documents can be found here.'


The documents main link (google drive)

Screenshot 2025-11-15 at 9.21.59 pm.png

Documents backup (dropbox)

Screenshot 2025-11-15 at 9.22.23 pm.png
 
Speculation that the timing of the ramping up the pressure on Trump re the latest release of Epstein emails where Trump is reportedly mentioned alot, is coincidentally timed with negotiations of a new 20 year US agreement on military aid to Israel.





'To make this massive data dump more accessible, COURIER has compiled the 20,000 documents from Epstein’s estate into an easily searchable repository via Google Pinpoint. Use the search tool here.

'I searched for the word “Trump”. 2,020 hits'

'I tried a few others to see how they compare to Trump:

  • Bill Clinton: 368
  • Musk: 30
  • Obama: 464
  • Bill Gates: 55
  • Prince Andrew: 174
  • Alan Dershowitz: 115
  • Woody Allen: 74
  • Kevin Spacey: 31
  • Epstein: 1,105
  • Ghislaine: 151
  • Melania: 23
  • Marla: 5'
 
'To make this massive data dump more accessible, COURIER has compiled the 20,000 documents from Epstein’s estate into an easily searchable repository via Google Pinpoint. Use the search tool here.

The top 10 people in a long long list of people named in the 20k docs by number of documents they appeared in.

Screenshot 2025-11-15 at 9.50.35 pm.png
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't be taken anything emailed by Epstein or GMax as being the whole truth.
There MO was clearly to compromise powerful people, and people of influence (past, present,future).

Falsely implicating Trump, or insinuating that Virginia Giuffre was a victim (back then) of Trump's, is an easy trap to fall into, what with Trump's reputation over the years and what we now know about him.

Using the word 'Victim' (for Virginia) in the redacted emails, could in itself cause a whole heap of legal issues and upcoming pain for those that did the redaction wording, seeing as how at this point there is no evidence that Virginia was ever a victim of Trumps.

The files relate to Epstein, Guiffre was a victim of Epstein. It’s not at all a controversial or legal problem to refer to her as a victim.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Giuffre v Louden, the battle for her assets after she was killed, I mean killed herself without a will, hit the WA Supreme Court today as a Case Management Conference.


It was nominally an In Chambers (not open to public) hearing yet media was allowed in.

File number CIV 1669 of 2025
 

'in the weeks before her death in April, Giuffre wrote a will and contacted her lawyer, Karrie Louden, to have it prepared. ... documents submitted to the court by Louden and Giuffre’s former carer, Cheryl Myers, represent their mother’s final intentions.... Louden and Myers’ counterclaim argues the court should recognise verbal and written instructions they received as an “informal will”, which under WA law allows certain documents or notes to be validated as expressing a person’s intentions for their estate.
...
“On 2 April 2025, the deceased provided verbal instructions to the first defendant [Louden], in the presence of the second defendant [Myers], to prepare a will to be executed in accordance with … the Wills Act.”
A document submitted by the defence reads: “I appoint Cheryl Myers and Karrie Louden as my executors and trustees.”
...'


In addition the article reports that Virginia's two adult son's argue that their mother lacked the capacity to make a will at the time the documents were drafted, and are expected to produce Virginia's medical records as evidence to support this.

Also that Virginia's Lawyer (Louden) has a fiduciary duty conflict because she stand's to benefit from Virginia's estate, if the claimed informal will is accepted. Likewise Myers is also set to benefit from the informal will being accepted.
 
'... US district judge Rodney Smith ruled that the Epstein Files Transparency Act, signed into law last month by Donald Trump, overrode federal rules prohibiting the disclosure of grand jury materials.

The Friday ruling approved the justice department’s request to unseal documents from the 2006-2007 federal grand jury investigation into Epstein in Florida. An earlier attempt to release these same transcripts was denied by a different judge earlier this year
...'


Noting that the article also reports that US law also allows the Justice Dept. to withhold files that could jeopardize an active federal investigation. And that files can also be withheld if they’re found to be classified, or for national defence or foreign policy reasons.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Jeffrey Epstein - * Prince Andrew is stripped of title & evicted from residence

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top