- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,967
- 57,017
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #1,484
Here are the latest Epstein documents.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If she takes a fall down the stairs, what's then in the way of Virginia Giuffre releasing the names?
Well apparently a number or all of them are fighting to keep their names secret. Seriously hope so. It’s diabolical that this story has been front page news for so long and yet we know so little about who Epstein was working.Now that she isn't contesting the release of the names of eight men she arranged under aged liaisons with - I wonder if we get to hear who they are.
It might be directly related to her case where identities of people she sex trafficked to have been suppressed as that wasn't directly relevant to her case, to whom didn't matter but that she did mattered etc - which would go some way to explaining why she is found guilty of sex trafficking minors to men but those men haven't been arrested for sex with minors.
So is she testifies to their identity, gets a very light sentence or gets to serve her time in home detention and the prosecution goes after the named individuals instead.
Can't they offer all the way up to immunity for cooperation in other cases?Some reasonable points here.
Although US law has it's differences - I could be wrong, but I doubt any court/prosecutor/DA has the legal jurisdiction with any defendant found guilty of trafficking minors (Maxwell), to request the names of others involved in relation to negotiating sentencing..?
Even if Maxwell publicly revealed the identities of those she allegedly trafficked to/for (e.g. Clinton etc.) it's actually an entirely different legal case - which is not to say charges against those identities could/would then be pursued separately.
The media speculating otherwise with the; 'no longer objecting to protecting identities' headlines, I think you'll find is simply ignoring the legal relevance and what is permissible here?
I also suspect the main reason these identities have never been known, is that most of the 'alleged victims' had/have no idea who these men actually were/are - and they were paid and encouraged not to ask related questions at the time and were also likely conveniently drunk or drugged or both...
Who was it earlier in this thread who naively thought Ex-Prince Andrew would be the only big name...Ghislaine Maxwell will no longer fight to keep names of 8 ‘John Does’ secret
A lawyer for Maxwell stated in a letter to federal Judge Loretta Preska this week that she would no longer object to the identities of the “John Does” in a 2015 civil lawsuit.nypost.com
Who was it earlier in this thread who naively thought Ex-Prince Andrew would be the only big name...
Would be some very worried people!
Edit jason_recliner - thoughts now?
A poll on who the Evil 8 might be?We might almost be ready for a new poll.
The photo of Prince Andrew at the mansion was odd, I think Paul Keating's daughter was photographed nearby?Or blackmail purposes? Not for money - Epstein didn’t need that - but to keep Andrew quiet?
There is also that footage of Andrew peeking out of the door of Epstein mansion. Was there a possible tip off that he would be there?
$5million! Who is going to cover that costs, Prince Andrew will need his mum to help him out. I thought he would've been worth more considering he sold his property years ago
Anyway I am surprised he wants a jury trial
Unfortunately I think Andrew's strategy is to use a 'contaminated' jury. The jury won't be able to give an unbiased verdict due to the extensive global media coverage over many years and the case will be dismissed.
Anyway I am surprised he wants a jury trial
Prince Andrew reaches 'settlement in principle' with Virginia Giuffre in civil sex case
The Duke of York will also be making a "substantial donation" to Ms. Giuffre's charity in support of victims rights, while the exact sum of the settlement will remain confidential.
If $15M... there was way more to it than an innocent photo as he has been claiming.Prince Andrew reaches 'settlement in principle' with Virginia Giuffre in civil sex case
The Duke of York will also be making a "substantial donation" to Ms. Giuffre's charity in support of victims rights, while the exact sum of the settlement will remain confidential.
Early media 'speculation' suggest this is/will be around USD $15 Million. Although 'confidential' usually means this should never be public record.
Watch this space...