snitzel
Cancelled
- Aug 16, 2009
- 1,471
- 812
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- GWS
It's the psychology of it which interests me.You keep on replying/justifying/defending your club on this, yet another lie from the Essendon camp.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It's the psychology of it which interests me.You keep on replying/justifying/defending your club on this, yet another lie from the Essendon camp.
Well he has "general soreness" doesn't he? So if he has no IN, how can he play against Williamstown anyway? Wouldn't he be better off rested and ready to go for next week, assuming whatever he has is this debilitating?Sorry I'm confused.
The AFL has ruled that all non-2012 players can't play against Williamstown as they can play against the saints. This includes Daniher. If Daniher had an IN, he couldn't play against the saints, and thus would be allowed to play against Williamstown.
Am I missing something?
I can't fathom what would happen if Essendon is found not guilty.
Yes, logic.hahaha please don't bring your logic in to this
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Do you know he wasn't part of the program?He wasn't part of the program.
So speculate all you want.
Btw Essendon aren't working overtime to protect "someone."
Why would they inject anyone?Why would they inject Daniher and not first year guys like Merrett, Kavanagh, Dalgleish, Obrien ect?
But it's s you that interests the psychologists.It's the psychology of it which interests me.
Melts down about not caring... lol you are a living oxymoron.Do non-Essendon supports not realize that we do not care what you think of us?
Why keep going on about people hating us after this? We gonna have a bad name after this? Are you trying to scare us?
I hate you and your club already, I didn't need a drug saga.
You have all probably researched more crap about drugs in sport because of this (to try and get a one up against Essendon supporters) than ever studied anything in your school years, and that's because of your hatred.
Your hatred, can't you see how far your hatred has pushed you over these years to this board? It is so deep, you have dug yourselves so deep into hatred that I can't fathom what would happen if Essendon is found not guilty.
You all say kool aid this, kool aid that but if someone was reading a story/novel about this years later and they had to describe the Essendon supporters I think they would say "they were supportive and defensive of their club".
Stop trying to convince me you and footy world will label us "whatever" for years to come unless we do what you tell us to, I aint drinking that kool-aid.
Yeah I guessed as much.Melts down about not caring... lol you are a living oxymoron.
I personally think he has an INjury, just my gut feeling. Hope I am wrong though
They were all at the club at the same time...Because Daniher is considerably more talented than them? Also, were these players training with the club before they were drafted, like Daniher was?
At least you're man enough to now realise the bleeding obvious and admit it.Haven't read up on all of today's comments as yet, but it does seem pretty clear now that Joe doesn't have an IN.
I'm taking the HUNs word for it, and I feel a little dirty.
Still, I can't fathom how people could genuinely not query anything and everything involving Essendon after the last 2 years, so if speculation upsets you perhaps a small review of the timeline and the backflips might be in order.
Yeah, those idiots still think the players aren't going to be found guilty! What a bunch of morons!At least you're man enough to now realise the bleeding obvious.
Some are still pathetically clinging on to hope.
That is the question the AFL have demanded an answer to and told them they can't do that.Now why would Zach Merrett, Patrick Ambrose, Cooney, Gwilt and Goddard play a non practice match instead of the NAB when they have no IN?
Because Daniher is considerably more talented than them?
What's so amazing about that question?wowweeeeeeee
So why do you come here and why defend your club?Do non-Essendon supports not realize that we do not care what you think of us?
Why keep going on about people hating us after this? We gonna have a bad name after this? Are you trying to scare us?
I hate you and your club already, I didn't need a drug saga.
You have all probably researched more crap about drugs in sport because of this (to try and get a one up against Essendon supporters) than ever studied anything in your school years, and that's because of your hatred.
Your hatred, can't you see how far your hatred has pushed you over these years to this board? It is so deep, you have dug yourselves so deep into hatred that I can't fathom what would happen if Essendon is found not guilty.
You all say kool aid this, kool aid that but if someone was reading a story/novel about this years later and they had to describe the Essendon supporters I think they would say "they were supportive and defensive of their club".
Stop trying to convince me you and footy world will label us "whatever" for years to come unless we do what you tell us to, I aint drinking that kool-aid.
Why dope ANYONE?They were all at the club at the same time...
Why would Essendon dope a kid still in high school, who only attended training sessions sporadically, and who wouldn't be playing league football for over a year, yet not dope the new rookie players who were actually a chance of giving Essendon an immediate on-field boost as a result of the PEDs?
Oh please.
Your club undertook a doping program with little regard for the welfare of their players, continually changing their story/lying and treating everyone else with utter contempt. And you wonder why people dislike them and want to see them burn?![]()
At least you're man enough to now realise the bleeding obvious and admit it.
Some are still pathetically clinging on to hope.
Some are still pathetically clinging on to hope.
What's so amazing about that question?
Why do you think I posed it as a question, not as an actual statement?That's the best you could do as to determine why JD was the only minor involved in PEDs? Allegedly mind you.