- Banned
- #226
Your point being?And like most people, he’s fine after a couple of days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your point being?And like most people, he’s fine after a couple of days.
He also quarantined himself from his wife and kids to protect them.And like most people, he’s fine after a couple of days.
He also used Regeneron, the same drug used by Trump and approved for use under the EUA
He also quarantined himself from his wife and kids to protect them.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
Your point being?
His commitment to keeping fit is great. Good for him. Everyone would be better off if they were equally committed. But it's not a Covid treatment - or a substitute for vaccination.You mock his belief and commitment to his health, as well as some of the possible COVID treatments, yet he breezed through it like it was nothing.
And like most people, he’s fine after a couple of days.
How dare youRemember when Greta got covid before it was cool.
Was CNN actually wrong though? Ivermectin is a horse dewormer. They probably embellished but still.Gee, he got stuck into Sanjay Gupta about CNN. I guess you have to give some credit to Gupta for showing up as I presume he knew it was coming, but Rogan basically forced him to disavow some parts of CNN's coverage.
But if it can be prescribed for human consumption, as Rogan argues and Gupta concedes, it's misleading to say it's used exclusively as a horse de-wormer, which is the insinuation when it's referred to that way. It's an anti-parasitic agent that has been used to treat humans for other illnesses. You can debate its efficacy as a Covid treatment but to characterise it as being for horses and not humans seems inaccurate.Was CNN actually wrong though? Ivermectin is a horse dewormer.
Was CNN actually wrong though? Ivermectin is a horse dewormer. They probably embellished but still.
I wouldn't go that far. That claim is also self-serving. Rogan has often been misrepresented but that doesn't make the case that every single piece of reporting is undermined as a result.All they achieved is demonstrating that they are bad faith actors and if they can’t be trusted to frame things fairly in this instance the question should be applied to all their content.
You are correct but everyone keeps acting like they were lying. They technically weren’t.Merck’s new wonder drug Molnupiravir is a drug for equine encephalitis. Guarantee that won’t be mentioned 1000 times.
The question is why frame it like that? Why not question the merit rather than the source?
All they achieved is demonstrating that they are bad faith actors and if they can’t be trusted to frame things fairly in this instance the question should be applied to all their content.
I wouldn't go that far. That claim is also self-serving. Rogan has often been misrepresented but that doesn't make the case that every single piece of reporting is undermined as a result.
That's too broad a claim to be meaningful or demonstrable.It doesn’t undermine the validity of each report. The truth exists outside of the reporting of it, but it erodes the confidence of the organisation to either identify the truth or report it accurately.
Well, it's misleading if they suggest it's exclusively for horses when it's often prescribed for people.You are correct but everyone keeps acting like they were lying. They technically weren’t.
Rogan is responsible for his own acts of misinformation but he's not "equally culpable" because he's not held to the same standards as CNN. He's not a journalist and he's not a medical expert. He's a comedian and an MMA commentator. He still shouldn't mislead his audience but he's not in the business of journalism or communicating "expert medical advice", which is the claim CNN makes for itself.Rogan is just as culpable claiming it was the Ivermectin that cured his covid despite having monoclonal antibodies too. He’s also picking one part that conveniently suits his narrative. He doesn’t even mention that it could have been the MA that helped.
Except he is as culpable now because he has such a large platform with thousands of people listening to him on various forms of social media. A lot of people do use him as a reputable source because of that.Well, it's misleading if they suggest it's exclusively for horses when it's often prescribed for people.
Rogan is responsible for his own acts of misinformation but he's not "equally culpable" because he's not held to the same standards as CNN. He's not a journalist and he's not a medical expert. He's a comedian and an MMA commentator. He still shouldn't mislead his audience but he's not in the business of journalism or communicating "expert medical advice", which is the claim CNN makes for itself.
That's too broad a claim to be meaningful or demonstrable.
Do you mean it erodes CNN's confidence internally? How does that work?
Alternatively, other people who are already sceptical of CNN will of course seize on this episode and claim it vindicates their scepticism across the board. But that's also self-serving and this episode in isolation doesn't make the case that CNN's reporting should as a result be presumed to be inaccurate.
You are correct but everyone keeps acting like they were lying. They technically weren’t.
Rogan is just as culpable claiming it was the Ivermectin that cured his covid despite having monoclonal antibodies too. He’s also picking one part that conveniently suits his narrative. He doesn’t even mention that it could have been the MA that helped.