Podcast Joe Rogan Experience

Remove this Banner Ad

Love Joe Rogan, despise Kanye. With intense ferver.
Still its another Rogan ep so Ill give it a go.
I couldnt hang in very long at all.
Bloke is just a complete and utter hack. his "music" is ear rape on a nuclear scale...and he is mentally deranged.
NEXT!
 
Jimmy Dore is a frustrating guest. Another case of Rogan being eager to find common ground and not really knowing enough to push back when required.

Rogan's favourite line is that we shouldn't be so tribal and shouldn't attack people just because we disagree with each other. But he then brings in some of the most hardcore partisans you can find, folks who are balls-deep in tribalism and attacking people on ideological lines. See Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Dan Crenshaw etc.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

Rogan's favourite line is that we shouldn't be so tribal and shouldn't attack people just because we disagree with each other. But he then brings in some of the most hardcore partisans you can find, folks who are balls-deep in tribalism and attacking people on ideological lines. See Ben Shapiro, Dave Rubin, Dan Crenshaw etc.

this is wrong.
 
He is left but he openly engages with right wingers in good faith and has right wing opinions interlaced throughout his ideology.
Because he goes on Tucker Carlson's show sometimes? How does that make him not partisan? He's partisan AF. I'm not sure what you think that word means if you think it doesn't apply to Dore.

Steve Bannon went on Bill Maher's show. I guess that means he's not partisan either?

Out of interest, what are Dore's RW opinions?
 
Because he goes on Tucker Carlson's show sometimes? How does that make him not partisan? He's partisan AF. I'm not sure what you think that word means if you think it doesn't apply to Dore.

Steve Bannon went on Bill Maher's show. I guess that means he's not partisan either?

Out of interest, what are Dore's RW opinions?

Partisan in the modern context is allegiance to party and in vigorous opposition to the other side.

Jimmy Dore literally ran a campaign against his own party with the force the vote scheme.

He is being called right wing currently for advocating for the Boogaloo Boys. He’s pro 1st and 2nd amendment, which are certainly hallmarks of modern right wing perspective.
 
Partisan in the modern context is allegiance to party and in vigorous opposition to the other side.
It doesn't specifically mean allegiance to a party. As for "vigorous opposition to the other side", how on earth does that not describe Jimmy Dore? He's vigorously opposed to plenty of things.

Jimmy Dore literally ran a campaign against his own party with the force the vote scheme.
Yeah, so how is that not partisan?

The fact he hammers the Democrats means he's not partisan?

He is being called right wing currently for advocating for the Boogaloo Boys. He’s pro 1st and 2nd amendment, which are certainly hallmarks of modern right wing perspective.
What does that even mean? He doesn't think those amendments should be repealed, so that's RW?

He interviewed a member of the Boogaloo Boys, so that's RW?

What are his RW opinions?
 
Last edited:
It doesn't specifically mean allegiance to a party. As for "vigourous opposition to the other side", how on earth does that not describe Jimmy Dore?

Yeah, so how is that not partisan?

The fact he hammers the Democrats means he's not partisan?

What does that even mean? He doesn't think those amendments should be repealed, so that's RW?

He interviewed a member of the Boogaloo Boys, so that's RW?

Which other side is Jimmy in vigorous opposition to? He just defends his positions. Partisan is not a synonym for being argumentative.

If he isn’t part of collective he can’t be a partisan...

There is a difference between interviewing and advocating... one is a communication between two parties the other is a positive promotion of their perspective.
 
Which other side is Jimmy in vigorous opposition to? He just defends his positions. Partisan is not a synonym for being argumentative.
He's vigorously opposed to various aspects of the political establishment on any number of issues. Didn't he call Joe Biden a war criminal on JRE? And you reckon he's not partisan? Good grief.

If he isn’t part of collective he can’t be a partisan...
Nonsense. Says who? What is this magic rule you've invented?

You can be ideologically partisan without being "part of collective".

There is a difference between interviewing and advocating... one is a communication between two parties the other is a positive promotion of their perspective.
You're making no points. Honestly, you sound disorientated.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

He's vigorously opposed to various aspects of the political establishment on any number of issues. Didn't he call Joe Biden a war criminal on JRE? And you reckon he's not partisan? Good grief.

Nonsense? Says who? What is this magic rule you've invented?

You can be ideologically partisan without being "part of collective".

You're making no points. Honestly, you sound disorientated.

Biden is a war criminal, Trump is a war criminal. The UN declared Yemen a war crime. How is that partisan?

Partisan means strong support to a party/cause/person. There is no negative context if it just means people who hold strong positions that don’t align with any already established parties. Being against corruption and holding nuanced political positions is not partisan.
 
Last edited:
Biden is a war criminal, Trump is a war criminal. The UN declared Yemen a war crime. How is that partisan?
I'd say that constitutes "vigorous opposition". It represents a clear commitment to a particular ideological position. That's partisan.

Partisan means strong support to a party/cause/person.
So in what universe is Jimmy Dore not partisan?

There is no negative context if it just means people who hold strong positions that don’t align with any already established parties. Being against corruption and for social services is not partisan.
You're making no sense. It's not about whether it's a "negative context" or not. It's simply a question of whether a person is committed to a particular ideology or set of positions. Jimmy Dore clearly qualifies. Hence, he is partisan.
 
I'd say that constitutes "vigorous opposition". It represents a clear commitment to a particular ideological position. That's partisan.

So in what universe is Jimmy Dore not partisan?

You're making no sense. It' s not about whether it's a "negative context" or not. It's simply a question of whether a person is committed to a particular ideology or set of positions. Jimmy Dore clearly qualifies. Hence, he is partisan.

Only when it’s vigorous opposition on behalf of another cause or other side. There is nothing in the definition that says being opposed on a matter of principle.

The negative context was in reference to you insinuating that having Jimmy Dore on is in opposition to Rogans stated objective of less tribalism. As far as the political landscape goes Jimmy isn’t advocating for any established party. He talks issues which is exactly what the landscape needs and lessens tribalism.
 
Only when it’s vigorous opposition on behalf of another cause or other side. There is nothing in the definition that says being opposed on a matter of principle.

The negative context was in reference to you insinuating that having Jimmy Dore on is in opposition to Rogans stated objective of less tribalism. As far as the political landscape goes Jimmy isn’t advocating for any established party. He talks issues which is exactly what the landscape needs and lessens tribalism.
Seriously, WTF are you on about?

Jimmy Dore is a nailed-on, hard-left ideologue. To claim he's not partisan is absolute nonsense. The fact that he isn't affiliated with a major party makes no difference whatsoever.
 
Seriously, WTF are you on about?

Jimmy Dore is a nailed-on, hard-left ideologue. To claim he's not partisan is absolute nonsense. The fact that he isn't affiliated with a major party makes no difference whatsoever.

Not sure whether you’ve looked around lately but pro free speech and pro-gun are right wing positions these days. The political axis is not stagnant.

He may position himself as a Leftie but his open mind on right wing positions suggests he is not hard anything. Even anti-war which is the majority of his content is a central position these days and was a big pull of the Trump administration (publicly anyway).

The guy wants more social programs that isn’t exactly gulags and a cultural revolution. That is hard-left.
 
Last edited:
Not sure whether you’ve looked around lately but pro free speech and pro-gun are right wing positions these days. The political axis is not stagnant.

He may position himself as a Leftie but his open mind on right wing positions suggests he is not hard anything. Even anti-war which is the majority of his content is a central position these days and was a big pull of the Trump administration (publicly anyway).

The guy wants more social programs that isn’t exactly gulags and a cultural revolution. That is hard-left.
You're confused. If you don't reckon Jimmy Dore is hard-left then I don't know what reality you're inhabiting.
 
Seriously, WTF are you on about?

Jimmy Dore is a nailed-on, hard-left ideologue. To claim he's not partisan is absolute nonsense. The fact that he isn't affiliated with a major party makes no difference whatsoever.

Dore is more of an old school liberal than hard core left.

Hard core left are anti-free speech.

The hard core left went after Tulsi Gabbard. Dore did not.

He is definitely not what you claim he is.

You're wrong.
 
Sorry but you've got no idea what you're talking about. These are a series of confused statements.

No you're confused to all *.

You only have to look at the reporters he works with to understand he's not hard core left.

Hard core left *******s won't associate with many of the people he does.

You think the hard core left support Assange the Libertarian?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top