Djcjdees
Premiership Player
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
- Posts
- 3,056
- Reaction score
- 2,707
- Location
- Hobart
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Middlesbrough FC
Have noticed this year that with the vast increase in the speed of the game and the AFL doing everything they can to change the rules to ensure the ball is always moving, that there is more soccering off the ground.
With the ball being soccered more there seem to have been way more chances for the traditional 'in danger' free to be paid but the umpires aren't obliging.
This rule would seem contrary I guess to the AFL's move-it-at-all-cost strategy of rule changes at the moment, and am just wondering if anyone else has noticed the fact this one isn't applied anymore.
There were a few instances in today's game (cats) where I thought there was legitimately a "danger" to the play trying to actually pick the ball up from the swing boots of opposition players. Call me crazy, but I thought that was what the rule was brought in for..
With the ball being soccered more there seem to have been way more chances for the traditional 'in danger' free to be paid but the umpires aren't obliging.
This rule would seem contrary I guess to the AFL's move-it-at-all-cost strategy of rule changes at the moment, and am just wondering if anyone else has noticed the fact this one isn't applied anymore.
There were a few instances in today's game (cats) where I thought there was legitimately a "danger" to the play trying to actually pick the ball up from the swing boots of opposition players. Call me crazy, but I thought that was what the rule was brought in for..









