Remove this Banner Ad

Kosi

  • Thread starter Thread starter choppa77
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Nah, I think he's fine... it'll go to the tribunal, but they'll throw it out, or give him a suspended sentence (as opposed to a SUSPENSION sentence...).
 
Goodbye sir for at least 2-3 weeks.
MRP will surely rub him out.


why dont your club rub out Didak for what he did recently and also johnson and tarrant last yr instead of coming in here and preaching ?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Lol Because there Off field incidents and the club decides on their Fate

this is on field incident and AFL decide their Fate in terms of playing on the field.
 
I think he may get a couple, but I expect the club to put up one hell of a fight on his behalf. Time for us to dig out the biomechanical experts and the video footage gurus to get him off.
 
Lol Because there Off field incidents and the club decides on their Fate

this is on field incident and AFL decide their Fate in terms of playing on the field.


the afl were supposed to get tough on off field incidents but as its collingwood and not the eagles or some other club then they turn a blind eye to collingwoods lack of punishment for some of their players off field behaviour.
 
the afl werent even hard on cousins.
they didnt suspend him the club did
didnt ban him or anything.
 
well he admitted he was doin wrong or something like that.

so really even tho he admitted he still should get into trouble

if u admit to murdeing someone u dont get off scotch free.
 
well he admitted he was doin wrong or something like that.

so really even tho he admitted he still should get into trouble

if u admit to murdeing someone u dont get off scotch free.

wrong again my friend... he admitted to "substance abuse" that could mean simply he took too many panadols a day if you wanted to be nit picky... (clearly it was not panadol) now the AFL is hardly going to suspend him for that (nor can they for that matter)
 
lol he basically admitted doing it wrong cos if it was jus panadol or something thats unbannable he wouldnt bother
so by speaking up he tried to look the good guy.

he still in the wrong
he is in the head.
was it this year or last year when he ran from the coppers cos he was drunk whilst driving
 
My prediction : one week.

If we do lose Kosi for one week, we can manage (with the carlton game) If we lose him for more than one match, then that won't be good news.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If Kosi goes, bring on Ferg Watts. Let him tear the Blues apart. Jon Brown style!

Matthew Clarke might get recalled? He has been right for two weeks (unless he has been reinjured again) Casey having the bye doesn't help his cause. It just might be better a ruckman for a ruckman.
 
God knows how you can get Didak and Cousins into this thread?

If drugs and off field behaviour was the point of Kosi's report then he will difinitely get off. If it was for the flying, late elbow to the back of the head he will get pinged...

It doesn't really matter if Didak and Cousins snort ten kilo's of coke and drive around Melbourne all week shooting kittens and burning Kosi in effigy I'd don't think the tribunal will take it into account.

Even the media have dropped the Didak thing and Cousins only gets a mention re: his outstanding return. Maybe some of you guys should take a leaf....!

For simple consistency Kosi will go for at least 1 week maybe 2...don't know what he was thinking but he really went a little "loose" for a while there and if I were they club docs I would be having a good look at him...
Good win Saints
 
God knows how you can get Didak and Cousins into this thread?

Correct, not relevent.

If drugs and off field behaviour was the point of Kosi's report then he will difinitely get off. If it was for the flying, late elbow to the back of the head he will get pinged...

Probably, but only worth one. Late and high, but not malicious. He was no later than Riccuito was on Kosi last week, and that wasn't cited at all.

Although it is chooklotto ... :rolleyes:
 
He would get a downgrade for a good record, because he has not been fit enought to hit anyone in 3 years!!

Seriously though, might be in a bit of trouble, maybe a week, but I remember Hird getting reported for something similar and getting a warning a couple of years ago on Anzac day.
 
A week won't be too much of a penalty considering who we play this week.

The problem will be who do you bring in? In Round 13 we brought Gehrig in, leaving Rix and Blake to ruck. If we do that again, does that mean we bring Watts in? Or on the other hand, bring in Doc Clarke to share ruck duties. Who do we push forward then? Neither Rix or Clarke is much chop as a forward.

The answer might be Barry Brooks, who can do both to some standard and won't be tested too much in the ruck by Ackland/O'Hailpin/Kennedy.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

A week won't be too much of a penalty considering who we play this week.

The answer might be Barry Brooks, who can do both to some standard and won't be tested too much in the ruck by Ackland/O'Hailpin/Kennedy.

I agree.

Let Rix/Brooks/Blake take on the Blues rucks. If they can't beat the combination you've listed above it'll say a lot about the future of the Saints rucks.

Alternatively bring in Fergus and I'd still back a Rix/ Blake combo to beat the blues talls. Only problem than is you lose the opportunity for Blake to play a shut-down as he did so well against Crawf. (I reckon that was an inspired move! Using one of our bottom 5 to cancel out one of their top 5. Long have people bemoaned Blakey as being big in the engine but small on skills. Maybe the run with role will suit him well. He's got the endurance and the physical attributes required.)
 
He would get a downgrade for a good record, because he has not been fit enought to hit anyone in 3 years!!

Seriously though, might be in a bit of trouble, maybe a week, but I remember Hird getting reported for something similar and getting a warning a couple of years ago on Anzac day.

The saints always seem to get the wrong end of the deal at the tribunal.
(Frase a couple of years ago on Cloke, and Baker last season got 2 - even though 2 players didn't even get cited for very similar incidents the week before)

He'll probably get 2.
 
I agree.

Let Rix/Brooks/Blake take on the Blues rucks. If they can't beat the combination you've listed above it'll say a lot about the future of the Saints rucks.

Alternatively bring in Fergus and I'd still back a Rix/ Blake combo to beat the blues talls. Only problem than is you lose the opportunity for Blake to play a shut-down as he did so well against Crawf. (I reckon that was an inspired move! Using one of our bottom 5 to cancel out one of their top 5. Long have people bemoaned Blakey as being big in the engine but small on skills. Maybe the run with role will suit him well. He's got the endurance and the physical attributes required.)

I remember Blake in his second year shutting down Camporeale, when Carlton were playing finals and we weren't. That was in one of Thomas' first games as coach. Having Leigh Fisher, Blake, Jayden Attard & Steven Baker all capable of playing a hard tag it does free up other players, such as Luke Ball, to be more damaging. Ball could cause some havoc for the rest of the season across half-forward.
 
Goodbye sir for at least 2-3 weeks.
MRP will surely rub him out.

Bugger off you little troll. If you want to talk crap then go on the Collingwood board with the rest of your uneducated, moronic friends.

Oh and by the way, you may want to do a grammar check before you post your dribble, because most of it doesn’t resemble anything remotely like English.

Kosi will get a week because it was reckless. End of story.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom