Kosi

[sainter]

2 weeks, reduced to 1 week with an early plea.

The club would be mad not to take it.

 

[andrew coombs]

Good luck to Kosi but the one week suspension is indicative of how farcical the whole process has become. He has charged up, taken his eyes off the ball and blatantly smashed a bloke in the back of the head. If an action like this is only worth one week the system needs an urgent overhaul. All we here about nowdays is duty of care and Kosi's hit from behind makes a mockery of that.

 

[Inside Goss]

Take the week, will be a good chance to let his body freshen up, this is the most footy hes played for a few years, don't risk getting 2.

 

[Persevering Saint]

Nah, I think he's fine... it'll go to the tribunal, but they'll throw it out, or give him a suspended sentence (as opposed to a SUSPENSION sentence...).

Well, I was wrong. I think we'll bring in Matty Clarke, and if he plays well, I think Rix'd better get busy or nervous. As we get closer to the finals, Lyon will be very tempted to have somebody of Clarke's experience in the side.

 

[The Mistro]

When can you tell if his going to contest it or not sounds like he won't but is it official.

 

[Qsaint]

Well, I was wrong. I think we'll bring in Matty Clarke, and if he plays well, I think Rix'd better get busy or nervous. As we get closer to the finals, Lyon will be very tempted to have somebody of Clarke's experience in the side.

Clarke or Brooks, didn't Clarke have a good game against King vs Geelong 2 weeks ago?

If Brooks doesn't get a game this week (Assuming Kosi's out) he has to be definately gone

 

[Qsaint]

2 weeks, reduced to 1 week with an early plea.

The club would be mad not to take it.

Agreed if we can't beat Calton without him we may as well give up this year. But we will definately need him the week after

 

[Qsaint]

Confirmed Kosi has taken the week

 

[wallyt99]

Honestly, I think he was lucky to get offered a week.

There was massive force behind that blow to the head, and I would say it was deliberate (he certainly wasn't going for the ball).


It was funny how he apologised straight away.....I would be apologising too if I just wacked Rob Cambell in the back of the head =).

 

[St DAC]

Honestly, I think he was lucky to get offered a week.

There was massive force behind that blow to the head, and I would say it was deliberate (he certainly wasn't going for the ball).


It was funny how he apologised straight away.....I would be apologising too if I just wacked Rob Cambell in the back of the head =).

It was late, not malicious. Only worth a week.

 

[Emmo]

lol he basically admitted doing it wrong cos if it was jus panadol or something thats unbannable he wouldnt bother
so by speaking up he tried to look the good guy.

he still in the wrong
he is in the head.
was it this year or last year when he ran from the coppers cos he was drunk whilst driving

Was it this week or last week he got 38 possies. The other dude is right his hands were never caught in the cookie jar so they try do anything he says proove it. they don't have a leagal leg to stand on.

plus im sure they probably would have persued the matter had the eagles let him off as you say "scotch Free".

pull your head in mate.

 

[Emmo]

It was late, not malicious. Only worth a week.

there was malice see the way he sort of stutters then really pushes off the ground before impact...could have been a lot worse though.

IMO he didn't like seeing harvs get a mark taken over him 2 times in 50 seccond thats why he hit so hard he knew he should have been at the contest...but i guess we will never know