Society/Culture Kyle Rittenhouse

[sherb]

The only turds were the ones burning down a city

"Property is more important than human life".

 

[RedVest4]

How was poor Kyle to know if they were loaded or not?

Have you read or watched any of the trial? Two of those shot had loaded guns trained on Kyle. As many as 16 shots were fired in the video not counting any from Kyles gun. The only “unarmed” person Kyle shot was on top of him trying to beat him to death with a skateboard

 

[RedVest4]

"Property is more important than human life".

Didn’t the riots kill 30 people and severely injure hundreds more

 

[sherb]

Have you read or watched any of the trial? Two of those shot had loaded guns trained on Kyle. As many as 16 shots were fired in the video not counting any from Kyles gun. The only “unarmed” person Kyle shot was on top of him trying to beat him to death with a skateboard

And that's why little boys should stay at home and not play vigilante.

 

[scoman]

In regards to the plastic bag, the skateboard, or both?

How was poor Kyle to know if they were loaded or not?

I really shouldn't have bothered.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Irrelevant.

He had already shot 2 people by this point. The plastic bag and skateboard guy.

Frankly, this 3rd guy would have been taking out a murderer.

 

[RedVest4]

And that's why little boys should stay at home and not play vigilante.

So the rioters attrocious behaviour is excused because you believe in their cause?

 

[RedVest4]

Irrelevant.

He had already shot 2 people by this point. The plastic bag and skateboard guy.

Frankly, this 3rd guy would have been taking out a murderer.

Not irrelevant at all. He is charged with first degree attempted homocide for shooting this man. At bare minimum that charge is instantly thrown out

 

[scoman]

Irrelevant.

He had already shot 2 people by this point. The plastic bag and skateboard guy.

Frankly, this 3rd guy would have been taking out a murderer.

Have you considered the 'what might have been' if plastic bag guy had not attacked Rittenhouse?

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Not irrelevant at all. He is charged with first degree attempted homocide for shooting this man. At bare minimum that charge is instantly thrown out

Im not talking about the 3rd guy's charges.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Have you considered the 'what might have been' if plastic bag guy had not attacked Rittenhouse?

Go back and read what you just wrote.

 

[sherb]

So the rioters attrocious behaviour is excused because you believe in their cause?

How did you arrive at that conclusion?

 

[scoman]

Go back and read what you just wrote.

Im sure you know what I mean. Would you like me to rephrase the question or would that be a waste of time?

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Im sure you know what I mean. Would you like me to rephrase the question or would that be a waste of time?

The only person who had claims of legit self-defense was the 3rd guy and he chose not to shoot Rittenhouse.

 

[Clubs are trumps]

Im sure you know what I mean. Would you like me to rephrase the question or would that be a waste of time?

Trying to reason with the leftists on here is a waste of time for the most part. I occasionally come in here just to hold up a mirror so they can see how despicable theyve become.

 

[Eagle Wrath]

How has it been answered? Even you have said he shouldn't have been there.

This is what vigilantism leads to. People like this twit, clearly lacking in any quality needed to be in a situation like that (experience, expertise, maturity, training, etc), getting in way over their heads.

He thought all he had to do was take a gun along and "sweet".

Your response still doesn't answer the question by the way.

Actually, one mob being allowed to riot and tear up the place, leads to vigilantism. You wouldn't be sooking, if it was a black guy shooting a group of white sepremacists that were burning down the place. He was completely justified in defending himself from the dangerous mob, regardless if you think he shouldve been there or not. The rioters should not have been there either.
He barely escaped with his life. Watch that video again where they had him on the ground. The mob were going in for the kill, only because they found out he wasn't a BLM supporter. Even the testimony of the guy shot in the arm, looks to have killed the case for the prosecution against Kyle. Drew a gun on him and got shot.

 

[sherb]

Actually, one mob being allowed to riot and tear up the place, leads to vigilantism. You wouldn't be sooking, if it was a black guy shooting a group of white sepremacists that were burning down the place. He was completely justified in defending himself from the dangerous mob, regardless if you think he shouldve been there or not. The rioters should not have been there either.
He barely escaped with his life. Watch that video again where they had him on the ground. The mob were going in for the kill, only because they found out he wasn't a BLM supporter. Even the testimony of the guy shot in the arm, looks to have killed the case for the prosecution against Kyle. Drew a gun on him and got shot.

Actually I would. I'm against the concept of taking law into your own hands.

And the Rittenhouse cluster**** is a perfect example of why.

 

[Eagle Wrath]

Actually I would. I'm against the concept of taking law into your own hands.

And the Rittenhouse cluster**** is a perfect example of why.

So you also think the rioters shouldnve been burning the place down then?

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Trying to reason with the leftists on here is a waste of time for the most part. I occasionally come in here just to hold up a mirror so they can see how despicable theyve become.

Go away, then.

 

[sherb]

So be honest. If during the capital hill protests, a black guy was mobbed by dozens of people and he shot a couple dead, whos side would you be on?

Why bring race into it? it's about vigilantism, and you haven't even mentioned that in your hypothetical.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

So be honest. If during the capital hill protests, a black guy was mobbed by dozens of people and he shot a couple dead, whos side would you be on?

Rittenhouse was mobbed by dozens?

 

[scoman]

Actually I would. I'm against the concept of taking law into your own hands.

And the Rittenhouse cluster**** is a perfect example of why.

Isn't that what the guys (skateboard guy and friends) who attacked Rittenhouse, as he was running away were doing? Were they not taking the law into their own hands?

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

He wouldve been if the first ones got their hits in. Luckily for him, he defended himself and the rest ran. He would be dead for sure right now if he hadnt of shot the first attackers.

You're playing out a fever dream.

 

[RedVest4]

How did you arrive at that conclusion?

You seem to be blaming Kyle rather than them

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Why did they attack him do u think?

You mean the guy armed with a plastic bag? Was Rittenhouse walking around with a loaded ar 15?