Lachlan Hansen

[Top_4_Tiger]

Cant believe this thread got so many replies
Pretty sure everyone knows that talls take longer to develop
If we wanted hansen we would have to give up a 1st rounder and a gun player at least .

"he hasnt showed much yet"
hhahah well if its as easy as that how about

Pettifer for Leunberger
Hyde for Gumbleton
Tivendale for Hansen

all sounds fair to me

Keep Dreaming

Then again, two years ago your attitude would see us trade Chris Newman for Livingston at Carlton.

Talls take longer to develop!

 

[bigstyletiger]

He's had injuries. You can't say he is a 'lemon' or 'isn't coming on'. If they were to give him up it would have to be for a good and young player. With regards to this who, with any market value, could we actually trade apart from Tambling?

 

[Jimmyjess]

North have deliberately kept Lachlan back in order to develop his body so that he is ready to assume a KP next year. If he had been at Melbourne, Port Adelaide etc I'm sure he would have been getting some important match experience. Laidley continues to show misguided faith in his older players such as Brown, Jones etc and its only lately that he's started to play some of the younger guys. Lachy had any interrupted pre-season with a foot injury and played sore for a number of weeks.

Was getting over his foot and would have been in the team for their game against West Coast but unfortunately did his medial ligament and had 4 weeks off before resuming for Werribee against Coburg. Was obviously short of a gallop in that game and will be slowly getting his match fitness back.

I suspect that he will be in the Roos team sooner than later and a regular from next year. Would love to have him at Richmond as he has an enormous engine and when his body size is around the 100kg he will be a huge asset. I don't expect that he will be going anywhere soon as the Roos see him as a 10 year + player.

Hey bigpapagman I notice that you said that Lachie played against you in the fourths GF in 2003 and 6 weeks later was representing Australia in Ireland. Nice to have something to hang on to but he went to Ireland in March 2005 which is more like 76 weeks later. A player can develop a lot in 18 months!!!!

 

[Top_4_Tiger]

Lachy had any interrupted pre-season with a foot injury and played sore for a number of weeks.

So did Cotchin

Nah but he should be a good player, I'd be getting worried if he doesn't have a kind of influence next year though.

 

[Kyusss]

Then again, two years ago your attitude would see us trade Chris Newman for Livingston at Carlton.

Talls take longer to develop!

or Lance Franklin... easy game to win

 

[cormick]

Guess we'll see this w/e how good he might be, n if hes worth pursuing.
Not that you can tell from one game, unless hes very good...but then his value'd go up

 

[Strawbs]

Trade Tambling? You're kidding.

 

[want2spoodge_pettifer]

i played on him in a fourths GF in 2003.

Took 12 marks, kicked 4 goals & had 20-odd touches & gave him an absolute bath.

6 weeks later he was playing for Australia in IR.

I didnt get it.

We dont need him.

douchebag. thats why youre on an internet forum and hes on an AFL list. HAHAJHAHAHAHAHAH

 

[bigpapagman]

turns out some people are far more motivated than i am.


**** me i had a day out that day though.

 

[Bren]

Lauchy for Cotchin sounds fair