Ladder Predictor with a difference

[Yeah Dardy]

You people seriously need to rethink your port adelaide predictions. In 2006 port will finish no lower than 8th and you can bookmark this if you want.

how do you work that out? Who have they pict up or what have PAFC done for you to come up with this conclusion?

Do you have all your hopes on Nathan Lonie

PAFC 8-13

Get back to me

 

[carn_the_cattas]

About as long as it takes for you to tie your shoes - you decide

Whoa, thats a looooooooooooong time.

 

[The Shag]

no offence to the creator of this thread, but this has quickly turned into the "stupid ********s thread"

 

[Strawberry Pancakes]

no offence to the creator of this thread, but this has quickly turned into the "stupid ********s thread"

All prediction threads do.

Congratulations on your observation

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Adelaide: 1st - 16th
Brisbane: 1st - 16th
Carlton: 1st - 16th
Collingwood: 1st - 16th
Essendon: 1st - 16th
Fremantle: 1st - 16th
Geelong: 1st - 16th
Hawthorn: 1st - 16th
Kangaroos: 1st - 16th
Melbourne: 1st - 16th
Port Adelaide: 1st - 16th
Richmond: 1st - 16th
St.Kilda: 1st - 16th
Sydney: 1st - 16th
West Coast: 1st - 16th
Western Bulldogs: 1st - 16th

Somebody is bound to bet against you.

 

[Carmichael]

Carlton 16th, only certainty

Rubbish, it's Collingwood's turn.

Carlton actually have some decent kids. Can't say the same about Collingwood and their ageing veterans.

 

[Strawberry Pancakes]

Rubbish, it's Collingwood's turn.

Carlton actually have some decent kids. Can't say the same about Collingwood and their ageing veterans.

Carlton... Decent kids??

 

[Carmichael]

Carlton... Decent kids??

Waite, Thornton, Fisher, Simpson, Carrazzo and Bentick look all alright from what I've seen of them.

The rest are garbage though. As I said, they're kids aren't that bad - well, not on the Collingwood level of bad anyway.

 

[Strawberry Pancakes]

Waite, Thornton, Fisher, Simpson, Carrazzo and Bentick look all alright from what I've seen of them.

The rest are garbage though. As I said, they're kids aren't that bad - well, not on the Collingwood level of bad anyway.

Well... their kids are pretty bad, but you do make a good point... When comparing them to the youth Collingwood possess the future looks to be shining very brightly for the Blues.

 

[TigerFan]

Adelaide: 1st - 6th
Brisbane: 5th - 10th
Carlton: 12th - 16th
Collingwood: 12th - 16th
Essendon: 4th - 9th
Fremantle: 7th - 12th
Geelong: 2nd - 7th
Hawthorn: 12th - 16th
Kangaroos: 6th - 11th
Melbourne: 6th - 11th
Port Adelaide: 7th - 12th
Richmond: 12th - 16th
St. Kilda: 4rd - 9th
Sydney: 1st - 6th
Western Bulldogs: 2nd - 7th
West Coast: 1st - 6th


some people are optimistic about Richmond in 2006 - I think we'd do well to hold ground. Essendon aren't a popular top eight choice either - but I think they're going to be the big movers of 2006. all in all, I'd be surprised if I got many of these wrong.

 

[fryingpan]

I think you need to re-do yours. Carlton and Hawthorn can't take up all the bottom 4 spots.

Yeah what's he doing?! Collingwood isn't in there??!!?