Remove this Banner Ad

Let's all laugh at Federer . . . again

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You call a 10 time Slam winner "duderer" hiding behind a head to head record Nadal owns because he can't regularly reach finals away from clay and accuse me of trolling !!!!! Come on TP.

Simple question for you. Do you agree with rafael Nadal's openly stated belief that Roger Federer is the best tennis player in the world?
 
I can say the same about grass, recently Safin said no one gives a shit about grass other than a handful of players.
Click to expand...

You know you're sturggling when you're using the word of Safin in your argument.

Did he even ever say that? And if he did, what can you show us anything that his word here actually has any merit?

much bigger than grass courts anyway.
Click to expand...

Wimbledon has always been the most prestegious event. And the more significant.

You can whine all you want, but at GS events 3>>>>>>>1. Rafa >>> Fed at GS head to heads. GS is still a GS, who gives a **** about rankings? its still GS. Give it a rest.
Click to expand...

Who gives a s**** about head to head?

All that matters is results, specifically GS results. You seem to be treating the French Open and Nadal's wins over him as the only things that matter. And what is worst of all, you name him "Duderer". If Federer was to read this thread (And your posts), he'd laugh his arse off so hard that the competition would be much more open.
 
Safin who has never won the most prestigious tournament and never will reckons grass and by extension Wimbledon doesn't matter to most of the other loser players.

Strangly the likes of Connors, McEnroe, Sampras, Federer, Agassi and Becker all agree without argument it is the number one tournament. I wonder what separates all of those multiple slam winning champions from Safin?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

gaelictiogar said:
You call a 10 time Slam winner "duderer" hiding behind a head to head record Nadal owns because he can't regularly reach finals away from clay and accuse me of trolling !!!!! Come on TP.

Simple question for you. Do you agree with rafael Nadal's openly stated belief that Roger Federer is the best tennis player in the world?
Click to expand...

i agree he is the best player in the world as well but if you consider rafas age, rafa is miles ahead of roger at this stage of his career. By the time rafa is 26, he will win 10 slams as well. Bookmark it
 
Thrawn said:
You know you're sturggling when you're using the word of Safin in your argument.

Did he even ever say that? And if he did, what can you show us anything that his word here actually has any merit?
[/quote ]
you know you are struggling when you actually accuse someone of lying. . Grass season is only 3 weeks long, no one gives a shit other than a handful. Guys like moya and gonzalez and other south americans like Rios, Chela, stated years ago that grass is for cows. I dont like grass, but thats my choice. GS = GS still. Winning a F.O is still equal to winning a wimbledon. :rolleyes:
Thrawn said:
Who gives a s**** about head to head?
All that matters is results, specifically GS results. You seem to be treating the French Open and Nadal's wins over him as the only things that matter. And what is worst of all, you name him "Duderer". If Federer was to read this thread (And your posts), he'd laugh his arse off so hard that the competition would be much more open.
Click to expand...

It still means Nadal is the only guy in the world who can give federer a hard time in the world. Even federer accepts it, about time you do too.
Click to expand...
 
gaelictiogar said:
Safin who has never won the most prestigious tournament and never will reckons grass and by extension Wimbledon doesn't matter to most of the other loser players.

Strangly the likes of Connors, McEnroe, Sampras, Federer, Agassi and Becker all agree without argument it is the number one tournament. I wonder what separates all of those multiple slam winning champions from Safin?
Click to expand...

It is still a GS. Statistically, they are all the same. Get over it.
 
gaelictiogar said:
You call a 10 time Slam winner "duderer" hiding behind a head to head record Nadal owns because he can't regularly reach finals away from clay and accuse me of trolling !!!!! Come on TP.

Simple question for you. Do you agree with rafael Nadal's openly stated belief that Roger Federer is the best tennis player in the world?
Click to expand...

Thats because i dont cry every rafa loses.I dont whine about injuries or surface like you do. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Atleast be a man and take the loss a man instead of whinning .According to you everytime Federer loses its because he let Rafa win.:rolleyes::thumbsdown:
 
Total Power said:
Thats because i dont cry every rafa loses.I dont whine about injuries or surface like you do. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Atleast be a man and take the loss a man instead of whinning .According to you everytime Federer loses its because he let Rafa win.:rolleyes::thumbsdown:
Click to expand...

It's not that he let's Nadal win. Of course he doesn't. It is that the surface rewards the prosaic attributes of resilience and lung power whilst blunting the facets of elegance and finesse displayed by federer.

Read the list of relative duds - to use one of your words - who won RG whilst Mcenroe was on top. None comparable to him but he didn't win at RG because brilliance doesn't count there when the clay slows everything down.

I imagine you accept my contention that McEnroe and Fed are the greatest natural talents we have seen in the open era. It's a fairly unarguable contention which would be accepted by 90% of pros. They both owned No.1 for years and both farmed titles on grass and hards at london and NYC and Fed farms melbourne as Mc would have done had he bothered competing. Both are/were raved about by their peers. However neither has won at RG. It's the surface. it blunts the edge genius has over mere competence and the fact that the 2 bona fide genius players failed there illustrates the point.

I confidently predict rafa nadal will never beat roger Federer at any other Slam event. he simply can't play tennis well enough to do so without the slowing effect of clay.
 
gaelictiogar said:
It's not that he let's Nadal win. Of course he doesn't. It is that the surface rewards the prosaic attributes of resilience and lung power whilst blunting the facets of elegance and finesse displayed by federer.

Read the list of relative duds - to use one of your words - who won RG whilst Mcenroe was on top. None comparable to him but he didn't win at RG because brilliance doesn't count there when the clay slows everything down.

I imagine you accept my contention that McEnroe and Fed are the greatest natural talents we have seen in the open era. It's a fairly unarguable contention which would be accepted by 90% of pros. They both owned No.1 for years and both farmed titles on grass and hards at london and NYC and Fed farms melbourne as Mc would have done had he bothered competing. Both are/were raved about by their peers. However neither has won at RG. It's the surface. it blunts the edge genius has over mere competence and the fact that the 2 bona fide genius players failed there illustrates the point.

I confidently predict rafa nadal will never beat roger Federer at any other Slam event. he simply can't play tennis well enough to do so without the slowing effect of clay.
Click to expand...

I dont understand, on one hand you claim he is a magician and he can beat rafa on clay and he has figured it out already and then on the other hand when he loses you blame the surface.What happened to your magician who worked out how to beat Rafa on clay?:confused:
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Let's all laugh at Federer . . . again

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top