_RT_
Not A Minion
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Posts
- 50,535
- Reaction score
- 103,681
- Location
- Southern Stand Punt Road End
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Thread starter
- Staff
- #151
Yet as mentioned Newman is still here 192 games later while others have come and gone. Now you can believe that he got the spot by default because there was no-one else was good enough to take the spot off of him or you could accept that Newman is actually servicable at what he does. Odd are that you're not going to do the latter.I've explained why Wallace played him, Frawley tried to play him as a lock down small defender and had to end up hiding him, who knows why Hardwick lets him get away with some of the games he's handed in as captain.
As for why they got it wrong, none of them have had anything better on offer. That doesn't make Newman good enough at the role by default.
The one constant apart from never playing finals in Newman's time, which is no coincidence. By that I don't mean it was his fault alone, but he's been a willing contributor to a failed rebound system where players regularly shirk responsibility for a decade and that's harmed us as much as any other single thing.
Well aware that both sides make adjustments all game. My point was that Newman doesn't just get stuck on the oppositions worse forward as you claimed, as they usually try and get Deledio onto that player to free him up more. Then you changed the arguement.If you want to pretend that opposition sides change their attacking match-ups at only a small fraction of what we change our defensive ones, and that our coaches manage to far more often than not outwit the opposition coaches and get the match-ups we want, then please, fully indulge yourself in that fantasy.
I'm sitting at the game and can see what happens as it happens. You are the one who makes assumptions based on what the stats say and what you see when you freeze the replay. I'd suggest that is more likely to have some wholesale invention happening that what I see.Let the example-free wholesale invention commence.
I don't sit there and make detailed notes where I pause and rewind the replay over and over and study the stats to make sure that I see what I want to see. So why am I going to compare notes with someone who does. I go by what I see at the game as it happensI've offered to compare my analysis publicly to yours as seen from the ground, you've ignored the offer once again because you - quite rightly - suspect you'll get flogged. I'm not going to write a detailed explanation of how I analyse games solely for your entertainment.
I nit pick your posts to discuss the points that interest me or where I believe that you are wrong. The fact that you then go into massive detail in reply is not my fault. IMO its because you have this desire to prove that everything you say is correct. As Claws said you often change the goalposts, when the discussion doesn't seem to be going your way. I have also noticed in the past that you are quite happy to offer short reponses to posters who agree with your POV.You are wasting my time and you well know it. And we both know why you're doing it.
Seeing that isn't going to happen, let me instead ask you; are there any examples anywhere else on the board of this type of 'discussion?'
You take a piece of something I post (often something I've posted in response to someone other than you) and then by way of your '100 innocent and perfectly reasonable questions,' oblige me to sign on for a 5+ day endless multi-quoting debate where it would take increasingly endless hours of my time to respond. If I try to abbreviate the ridiculous volume of words into something vaguely manageable, you claim I'm avoiding points. If I ignored you, then you'd pretend it was because I couldn't answer and harp on endlessly about that. If I ask you to stop being an arseh*le and wasting hours of my time (as I already have numerous times), you pretend your behaviour is normal and reasonable and that my complaints are not - I'm just trying to avoid your awesome debating skills.![]()
Can you name any other instances of you doing the above to someone else here, day after day, year after year? There are none, right? So what makes me so 'special?' What on earth do you think gives you the right to subject other people to such treatment? - I believe the word they use these days is 'bullying.'
BTW Ray as much as you would like to think you're special the truth is you're not. As a Mod I have to follow all threads and when you post I often check the responses to ensure that posters aren't taking pot shots and you and you aren't returning serve.









