- May 5, 2006
- 62,726
- 70,017
- AFL Club
- West Coast
It’s the cliched ‘work to live’, not ‘live to work’. I’m high enough in my company to be comfortable but have no desire whatsoever to be the boss, spending day and night worrying about work. Come 5pm, I’m off clock with the kids and work can piss off.
It's a bit circular. Unless you come from money you need to make it in order to have it in order to not worry about it. So you study and train to develop skills, work to get experience and seniority etc. to make money in the hope that eventually you can ease off and spend more time not using those skills and experience. Time = money = time is how I look at things. Whatever you do for work you are effictively buying time to do things outside of it.
I've worked with people roughly 20 years older than me (give or take) who worked their arses off in their 20s when they were young and could've been travelling and drinking each weekend, then in their 30s when they had young families, then in their 40s, and now in their 50s and some probably into their 60s. They are all now very wealthy but IMO have never had a good work life balance and have spent so long working to work that they don't know any other way. Great that you can have a nice house in the GT and your kids can go to Scotch and you can afford an international skiing holiday each year but what about the other 50 weeks? I get it if you are battling to keep a roof over your head or working some overtime shifts might mean you can afford a holiday at Christmas etc. but when you could retire at 40 and live off investments why do it to yourself? Doesn't compute with me. I don't have kids but if I did I wouldn't want to be one of those people who leaves before they go to school then gets home at 7/8 at night.