Remove this Banner Ad

List Management

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

TigerAntho

Senior List
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Posts
191
Reaction score
1
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
Other Teams
Hull City
There seems to be a fair chunk of tigers supporters who believe that the coach is entirely to blame for the mess we are in. I have to agree. You can't bone a coach as there is more to a successful team than the man in the box, and obviously the cattle on the park are the ones who determine our win-loss ratios.

OK so in terms of ages there are serious concerns. A former North recruiter said last week in the paper that we had made out to seem we had a young list when we did not.

I understand it's 4 rounds in, but if Wallace is receiving scrutiny than there is no reasons the heat shouldn't be turned up on the players:

Under 23

  • Andrew Collins
  • Daniel Connors
  • Trent Cotchin
  • Brett Deledio
  • Shane Edwards
  • Angus Graham
  • Tom Hislop
  • Cleve Hughes
  • Luke McGuane
  • Mitch Morton
  • Jarrad Oakley-Nicholls
  • Jayden Post
  • Adam Thomson
  • Dean Putt
  • Alex Rance
  • Tyrone Vickery
  • Matthew White
  • Jack Riewoldt
  • Andrew Raines
  • Daniel Jackson
  • Richard Tambling
  • Adam Pattison
  • Robin Nahas
24-27

  • Nathan Foley
  • Dean Polo
  • Jake King
  • Jay Schulz
  • Will Thursfield
  • Shane Tuck
  • Graham Polak
  • Chris Newman
  • Mark Coughlan
  • Kayne Pettifer
  • Kelvin Moore
  • Jordan McMahon
28 and over

  • Joel Bowden
  • Nathan Brown
  • Matthew Richardson
  • Troy Simmonds
  • Ben Cousins
  • Kane Johnson

Age Unbalanced with Talent

Firstly AGE is important...however age is useless without talent...it's a mix of the two. Here's my theory...our OVER 27ers are on the list for the pure fact we have drafted poorly. They are/were keeping the side a float as Terry and co knew that our under 23ers arn't capable of playing at the level - or are late matures. If we look at Carlton, there are no over 30 year olds only one or two over 27. They have drafted much better than we have - with thanks to high draft picks. Unfortunately our draft choices have hurt us so much so that it has snowballed. Now 28 and plusers are not the type of players who can carry a side. That's what they have been doing. They're running out of legs, and the weight is falling on our younger players, who can't cope and aren't good enough (yet) and we're being exposed. It strange but our list is equivalent with a premiership winning side. However look at our players between 23-27, there are no consistant perfformers who you would put your life on to win you games of footy. This is what the Lions of 2001 to 04 and Geelong now have. Look at the names. Bar Foley and Tuck, we have King, Schulz, Thursfield, Polak, Coughlan, Pettifer, McMahon. They are either at bugers, injured or you would delist at earliest conveinance. Thusrfield is the only of those you might consider keeping.

Veteran Problem


We heard Caro say it on FC but we are ageing at the wrong time ahead of the GC and West Syd draft concessions.A new coach is likely to swing the axe on a couple of these guys, while the others might retire.

Of them Johnson, Bowden and Simmonds are players who are tried and proven failures in winning us games of footy (as opposed to picking up uncontested possesion) - they are likely to reire or be delisted at the end of the year. Brown's form suggest he is on the downward sprial and may never recover from his leg injury, but would prove attractive to GC hungry for senior players and a 'star' to be the face of the club.

Richo will purely stay on for as long as he likes as he is the only one who tries and is in the best form - not to mention is epitomises whaty this club is about. Cousins will stay on as the club made a commitment to give him a chance, and I couldn't see him leaving the club anytime soon, barring massive injury problems.

That leaves another hole. While we can do with out 28 plusers, we don;t have any sort of talent bar two or three players i our prime 23-27 age group. Meaning we'll have to rely on our kids 23 and under to carry the load. At the moment though they aren't coping well, and its hard to guage their potential given the string of games we won at the end of last year had our vetrean playing in the side and in better form than they are now.

Futures

Time to be Given: It's confirmed that these players will be given at least 2-3 more seasons until we can make a proper judgment on their suitability at the club

  • Andrew Collins
  • Robin Nahas
  • Alex Rance
  • Dean Putt
  • Tyrone Vickery
  • Jayden Post
  • Daniel Connors
  • Shane Edwards
  • Jack Riewoldt
  • Angus Graham (all good ruckmans need time - even if he is 22)
Crunch Time: These players I think only have a season, 2 at max, to show they are AFL standard.

  • Tom Hislop
  • Adam Thomson
  • Adam Pattison
  • Andrew Raines (Questionable, has he asserted himself)
  • Cleve Hughes
  • Dean Polo
  • Will Thursfield
Tiger for Career: Have shown enough to warrant long term contracts at the club. Bottom two tradable, but will stay on purely for lack of experienced players, however could form Tivendale like careers - solid but not spectacular.

  • Brett Deledio
  • Trent Cotchin
  • Mitch Morton
  • Chris Newman
  • Luke McGuane
  • Kelvin Moore
  • Nathan Foley
  • Shane Tuck
  • Graham Polak (Injury factor)
  • Mark Coughlan (injury factor)
  • Matt White
  • Daniel Jackson
Trade Bait and/or Delisting material: Had chances, time, and is an indicament on our indigenous training facility. Bad pickups here (JON and Tanbling) and too late delistings (Schulz). Unfortuantelt its these players who won't take us to a premiership that are getting the games. And I can assure you Pets would be if we didn't have Morton, or he wasn't injured.

  • Jarrad Oakley-Nicholls
  • Richard Tambling
  • Jake King
  • Jay Schulz
  • Jordan McMahon
  • Kayne Pettifer
Summary

It's clear we must draft young players in the next few drafts, and get as much game time into them this season.
 
Collins is 20, Tambling is 22, yet Collins gets another 2/3 seasons to prove his suitability whilst Tambling is trade bait? I liked Collins' effort on Saturday but Tambling has done far more than him so far. And Bowden has been a twice All-Australian - very harsh assessment of him I reckon.
 
HERE'S one for you.

What could have been the list of 24-27s/28s.

Andrew Krakouer
Andrew Mills
Scott Homewood
Ty Zantuck
Brent Hartigan
Aaron Fiora
Martin McGrath
David Rodan
Daniel Sipthorp
Thomas Roach
Billy Nicholls
Alex Gilmour
Kyle Archibald
Simon Fletcher

OUCH!!!!:confused::confused::confused:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Collins is 20, Tambling is 22, yet Collins gets another 2/3 seasons to prove his suitability whilst Tambling is trade bait? I liked Collins' effort on Saturday but Tambling has done far more than him so far. And Bowden has been a twice All-Australian - very harsh assessment of him I reckon.

I have cut Richie plenty of slack. At the start of this season I belived that Tambling would be a player to find his niche and cement himself as a prominent midfielder at AFL level. The reality is a month in and he's at Coburg. The season's not over by any strecth, and he can still prove his worth - no doubt he is still very young. However on comparison with other players from the same draft he has been the most dissapointing thus far considering the pick which was used on him. He must assert him self at the very least by next year to show that he can play consistant, good, tough footy.

As for collins he's 20 younger than tambling, although admittedly he's been the system for 2 years. Give him time, he's on his way if last weeks performance was anything to go by.
 
HERE'S one for you.

What could have been the list of 24-27s/28s.

Andrew Krakouer
Andrew Mills
Scott Homewood
Ty Zantuck
Brett Hartigan
Aaron Fiora
Martin McGrath
David Rodan
Daniel Sipthorp
Thomas Roach
Billy Nicholls
Alex Gilmour
Kyle Archibald

OUCH!!!!:confused::confused::confused:

Try imagining those players taking us to a premiership...even my imagination is that big!
 
HERE'S one for you.

What could have been the list of 24-27s/28s.

Andrew Krakouer
Andrew Mills
Scott Homewood
Ty Zantuck
Brent Hartigan
Aaron Fiora
Martin McGrath
David Rodan
Daniel Sipthorp
Thomas Roach
Billy Nicholls
Alex Gilmour
Kyle Archibald
Simon Fletcher

OUCH!!!!:confused::confused::confused:

Dustin, that is absolute GOLD!!!
 
This is a great thread.

Tambling has to go.

he is simply lazy, lacks hunger and has had an armchair ride.


IT toook a disgraceful performance for him to be dropped and even then, terry made excuses for him.
 
We obviousley need too draft well this year and the main focus should be put on a key forward and a classy midfielder, which there should be plenty of.

LIST NEEDS
  • Key Forward- Best teams have them
  • Quality Mid- to add to Cotch, Lids, Foley, tuck & Cogs
  • Small forward- again good teams have them, we dont :rolleyes:
  • Half back flanker- someone that can actually kick, carlton did this last yaer and picked up Chris Johnson from Melb, and i thought it was a great pick up
TRADE BAIT
  • Shultz- Wont fetch for much but worth a try
  • Tambling- GC for a fresh start
  • Jackson- Dont rate him at all, meant to be a tagger but gets beaten consistantly, could hold some value.
  • Jake King
  • Pettifer
  • Nathan G Brown- Might present value at a club.

DELIST/ RETIRE
  • Kane Johnson(R)
  • Simmonds- clearly out of sorts but has the rest of the year to prove himself.
  • Jackson- if not traded
  • shultz- " "
  • Pettifer " "
The Final 22 could look something along the lines of:
B: Polo Thursfield Mcguane
HB Raines Moore Newman
C Richo Lids White
HF Connors Reiwoldt Cousins
F: Morton Hughes Collins
Fol Graham Foley, Tuck

Inc: Cotchin, Cogs, Rance, Putt/Pattison

Places up for grabs:
  • Adam Thomson- Mid
  • Edwards- FWD role
  • JON- FWD
  • Putt/Pattison Ruck/FWD
  • Gourdis- FWD
  • Nahas- FWD
  • Tambling- MID
Players have to deserve their spot in the team, good form should be rewarded and youth a must.

Thought???
 
We obviousley need too draft well this year and the main focus should be put on a key forward and a classy midfielder, which there should be plenty of.


LIST NEEDS
  • Key Forward- Best teams have them
  • Quality Mid- to add to Cotch, Lids, Foley, tuck & Cogs
  • Small forward- again good teams have them, we dont :rolleyes:
  • Half back flanker- someone that can actually kick, carlton did this last yaer and picked up Chris Johnson from Melb, and i thought it was a great pick up
TRADE BAIT
  • Shultz- Wont fetch for much but worth a try
  • Tambling- GC for a fresh start
  • Jackson- Dont rate him at all, meant to be a tagger but gets beaten consistantly, could hold some value.
  • Jake King
  • Pettifer
  • Nathan G Brown- Might present value at a club.

DELIST/ RETIRE
  • Kane Johnson(R)
  • Simmonds- clearly out of sorts but has the rest of the year to prove himself.
  • Jackson- if not traded
  • shultz- " "
  • Pettifer " "
The Final 22 could look something along the lines of:
B: Polo Thursfield Mcguane
HB Raines Moore Newman
C Richo Lids White
HF Connors Reiwoldt Cousins
F: Morton Hughes Collins
Fol Graham Foley, Tuck

Inc: Cotchin, Cogs, Rance, Putt/Pattison


Places up for grabs:
  • Adam Thomson- Mid
  • Edwards- FWD role
  • JON- FWD
  • Putt/Pattison Ruck/FWD
  • Gourdis- FWD
  • Nahas- FWD
  • Tambling- MID
Players have to deserve their spot in the team, good form should be rewarded and youth a must.

Thought???
Your obviously predicting some major events to take place like, White to overtake Cotchin and Coghlan and Hughes to go from being considered to be dropped from the VFL 2's to AFL full forward. I hope your right cause the day we have players with the ability of a fit Cotchin and Coghlan on the bench we will be a good club.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

HERE'S one for you.

What could have been the list of 24-27s/28s.

Andrew Krakouer
Andrew Mills
Scott Homewood
Ty Zantuck
Brent Hartigan
Aaron Fiora
Martin McGrath
David Rodan
Daniel Sipthorp
Thomas Roach
Billy Nicholls
Alex Gilmour
Kyle Archibald
Simon Fletcher

OUCH!!!!:confused::confused::confused:

that is exactly why we didnt start in the same position as the hawks. at least half the hawthorn premiership team is 24+ and retained from shwab. these are the 24+ year olds we would have had.
 
We really do lack 4-5 more promising 18/19 year olds, they should be on the list in the over 30's spots. Compared our list to Port's last night and it wasn't pretty, while people say we have a lot of youth it's not enough in terms of quantity and quality.
 
Great thread from you guys. Very interesting to read over a sandwitch at lunch time.

TRADE BAIT
  • Shultz- Wont fetch for much but worth a try
  • Tambling- GC for a fresh start
  • Jackson- Dont rate him at all, meant to be a tagger but gets beaten consistantly, could hold some value.
  • Jake King
  • Pettifer
  • Nathan G Brown- Might present value at a club.


I think the only player on this list that would attract any real interest would be Tambling. But with compromised draftes ahead, given GC17 concessions, he is probably only worth a low second round or third round pick.

Clubs would much rather take their chances on the draft, than a 22 year old who has hardly played a decent game at AFL standard.
The Final 22 could look something along the lines of:
B: Polo Thursfield Mcguane
HB Raines Moore Newman
C Richo Lids White
HF Connors Reiwoldt Cousins
F: Morton Hughes Collins
Fol Graham Foley, Tuck

Inc: Cotchin, Cogs, Rance, Putt/Pattison


Thought???

Unfortunatley, that side would note even go close to making finals. Talls are very ordinary, and their is one A grade player (Richo). The key to playing finals is a swag of match winners. Geelong has Ablett, Bartel, Selwood, Chapman, Scarlett and Johnson. Hawks have Buddy, Roughy, Hodge, Mitchell and Sewell. These are the players that win games, and elevate their teams.
 
We have missed the boat twice on Tambling

once picking him up and now its too late to trade him for any worth.

He will be a Tiger for life like Jake King.
 
There seems to be a fair chunk of tigers supporters who believe that the coach is entirely to blame for the mess we are in. I have to agree. You can't bone a coach as there is more to a successful team than the man in the box, and obviously the cattle on the park are the ones who determine our win-loss ratios.

OK so in terms of ages there are serious concerns. A former North recruiter said last week in the paper that we had made out to seem we had a young list when we did not.

I understand it's 4 rounds in, but if Wallace is receiving scrutiny than there is no reasons the heat shouldn't be turned up on the players:

Under 23

  • Andrew Collins
  • Daniel Connors
  • Trent Cotchin
  • Brett Deledio
  • Shane Edwards
  • Angus Graham
  • Tom Hislop
  • Cleve Hughes
  • Luke McGuane
  • Mitch Morton
  • Jarrad Oakley-Nicholls
  • Jayden Post
  • Adam Thomson
  • Dean Putt
  • Alex Rance
  • Tyrone Vickery
  • Matthew White
  • Jack Riewoldt
  • Andrew Raines
  • Daniel Jackson
  • Richard Tambling
  • Adam Pattison
  • Robin Nahas
24-27

  • Nathan Foley
  • Dean Polo
  • Jake King
  • Jay Schulz
  • Will Thursfield
  • Shane Tuck
  • Graham Polak
  • Chris Newman
  • Mark Coughlan
  • Kayne Pettifer
  • Kelvin Moore
  • Jordan McMahon
28 and over

  • Joel Bowden
  • Nathan Brown
  • Matthew Richardson
  • Troy Simmonds
  • Ben Cousins
  • Kane Johnson
Age Unbalanced with Talent

Firstly AGE is important...however age is useless without talent...it's a mix of the two. Here's my theory...our OVER 27ers are on the list for the pure fact we have drafted poorly. They are/were keeping the side a float as Terry and co knew that our under 23ers arn't capable of playing at the level - or are late matures. If we look at Carlton, there are no over 30 year olds only one or two over 27. They have drafted much better than we have - with thanks to high draft picks. Unfortunately our draft choices have hurt us so much so that it has snowballed. Now 28 and plusers are not the type of players who can carry a side. That's what they have been doing. They're running out of legs, and the weight is falling on our younger players, who can't cope and aren't good enough (yet) and we're being exposed. It strange but our list is equivalent with a premiership winning side. However look at our players between 23-27, there are no consistant perfformers who you would put your life on to win you games of footy. This is what the Lions of 2001 to 04 and Geelong now have. Look at the names. Bar Foley and Tuck, we have King, Schulz, Thursfield, Polak, Coughlan, Pettifer, McMahon. They are either at bugers, injured or you would delist at earliest conveinance. Thusrfield is the only of those you might consider keeping.

Veteran Problem

We heard Caro say it on FC but we are ageing at the wrong time ahead of the GC and West Syd draft concessions.A new coach is likely to swing the axe on a couple of these guys, while the others might retire.

Of them Johnson, Bowden and Simmonds are players who are tried and proven failures in winning us games of footy (as opposed to picking up uncontested possesion) - they are likely to reire or be delisted at the end of the year. Brown's form suggest he is on the downward sprial and may never recover from his leg injury, but would prove attractive to GC hungry for senior players and a 'star' to be the face of the club.

Richo will purely stay on for as long as he likes as he is the only one who tries and is in the best form - not to mention is epitomises whaty this club is about. Cousins will stay on as the club made a commitment to give him a chance, and I couldn't see him leaving the club anytime soon, barring massive injury problems.

That leaves another hole. While we can do with out 28 plusers, we don;t have any sort of talent bar two or three players i our prime 23-27 age group. Meaning we'll have to rely on our kids 23 and under to carry the load. At the moment though they aren't coping well, and its hard to guage their potential given the string of games we won at the end of last year had our vetrean playing in the side and in better form than they are now.

Futures

Time to be Given: It's confirmed that these players will be given at least 2-3 more seasons until we can make a proper judgment on their suitability at the club

  • Andrew Collins
  • Robin Nahas
  • Alex Rance
  • Dean Putt
  • Tyrone Vickery
  • Jayden Post
  • Daniel Connors
  • Shane Edwards
  • Jack Riewoldt
  • Angus Graham (all good ruckmans need time - even if he is 22)
Crunch Time: These players I think only have a season, 2 at max, to show they are AFL standard.

  • Tom Hislop
  • Adam Thomson
  • Adam Pattison
  • Andrew Raines (Questionable, has he asserted himself)
  • Cleve Hughes
  • Dean Polo
  • Will Thursfield
Tiger for Career: Have shown enough to warrant long term contracts at the club. Bottom two tradable, but will stay on purely for lack of experienced players, however could form Tivendale like careers - solid but not spectacular.

  • Brett Deledio
  • Trent Cotchin
  • Mitch Morton
  • Chris Newman
  • Luke McGuane
  • Kelvin Moore
  • Nathan Foley
  • Shane Tuck
  • Graham Polak (Injury factor)
  • Mark Coughlan (injury factor)
  • Matt White
  • Daniel Jackson
Trade Bait and/or Delisting material: Had chances, time, and is an indicament on our indigenous training facility. Bad pickups here (JON and Tanbling) and too late delistings (Schulz). Unfortuantelt its these players who won't take us to a premiership that are getting the games. And I can assure you Pets would be if we didn't have Morton, or he wasn't injured.

  • Jarrad Oakley-Nicholls
  • Richard Tambling
  • Jake King
  • Jay Schulz
  • Jordan McMahon
  • Kayne Pettifer
Summary

It's clear we must draft young players in the next few drafts, and get as much game time into them this season.

The highlighted players are still in the 23 and under brigade, Foley turns 24 in September, Thursty turned 23 on 19 April and Polo turns 23 later this year.

Our list deficiencies are well known to evry club and its recruiters. looking at the 24 and over brigade of which we have 14 this season, we are likely to have no more than 2 remaining at the club come end of season 2011. This could even be down to 1 if Cogs return is further blighted by injuries.

By 2012 season we most likely will have the youngest team of all AFL clubs it does not fix the malaise that is our list. The highlighted 23 and under players above will not be winning ys a premiership either.

The veteran problem you mentioned will be gone within the next 2 - 3 years as Bowden and Richo will retire.

In your list of future players I highlighted those I agree with. If Edwards was able to put on weight so he is not easily brushed aside, I would consider him on the list as he does have some excellent skills but is lacking in defensive pressure. The two ruckmen are not showing improvement at a steady rate, in Putt's case he is playing in Coburg's reserves which is not going to help his long term future.

Of your crunch time players I highlighted the ones I disagree with, Polo and Thrsty both have a role to play into the future at the club. Thursty will be our full back and Polo will be playing the McMahon role.

Career Tigers is pretty much a no-brainer except not seeing Jackson, White or Polak in that category. I sincerely hope Polak can come back 100% and I would have him as a career tiger then.

Your listing of trade baits is unlikely to find a club with any interest whatsoever. Schulz may have interested Port Adelaide 2 seasons ago but I doubt it would now.

In summary your right we do have to draft young player and get game time into them but this is going to take a lot of time, for the following reasons:

1. This years draft and the 2010 and 2011 drafts are compromised. This years is because no bottom age player is eligible this year, so all players drafted this season are 18 at the end of this year. Generally you will find there are at least half of the top 10 picks are bottom aged players. 2010 and 2011 drafts are compromised by the unwanted and unwelcome Gold Coast and West Sydney.

2. Based on the list we have today, I am sure there are 26 of the 40 players on our list that will not be with the club after 2011 or will play no part in a premiership. I am not saying all 26 players will depart the club in the next 3 years as we will have a very thin draft pool to choose from cutting our ability to draft ready made replacements. Therefore we will have to keep some players on our list that will not imprve us as a team.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

We really do lack 4-5 more promising 18/19 year olds, they should be on the list in the over 30's spots. Compared our list to Port's last night and it wasn't pretty, while people say we have a lot of youth it's not enough in terms of quantity and quality.
Don't worry, if we win less than 4 games this year those problems should be solved providing we dont go for recycled hacks.... we have enough already. Next year if we do the same we will have picks like 4 and 6 and 20, which is still pretty damn good. A continued cleanout of older players and the trading of acceptable players with value to the Gold Coast will fix our problems.

The fear is having a charge at the end of the year to save wallaces job to finish 9th again:o, having no good picks, and remaining medicore for the next 5 years. The next two drafts are crucial. If we play our cards right we are in a good position, if we fail we are in deep shit.
 
Our list deficiencies are well known to evry club and its recruiters. looking at the 24 and over brigade of which we have 14 this season, we are likely to have no more than 2 remaining at the club come end of season 2011. This could even be down to 1 if Cogs return is further blighted by injuries.

As a neutral supporter Richmond's deficiency is in quality. It has nothing to do with age.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom