Scandal Luke Slayers

[yaco55]

I’d still have my doubts that it gets to Court. There are several parties that will want to ensure that doesn’t happen. For the other party the price on that will be very lucrative. But as the voice of experience in a similar area and as has been pointed out already in this thread, Courts prefer not to have to rule on this type of stuff and encourage mediation at every turn. Let’s say Mr S offers the former Mrs S a sum of money which she rejects in the pursuit of the truth. Should she win and be awarded $1 less than she was offered she then goes on the hook for all of Mr S’s legal fees after the offer was made.

The pursuit of justice is a fallacy in many regards.

The only winners are the Lawyers.

I fail to see why Ms S wants this to play out in court. She will be extremely wealthy after the divorce settlement. Then again Mary Average would not have the funds to take this to the High Court.

 

[The Blue Max]

I fail to see why Ms S wants this to play out in court. She will be extremely wealthy after the divorce settlement. Then again Mary Average would not have the funds to take this to the High Court.

Slayer’s statement to the AFL slaughtered her character.

It brought into question her psychological state, her morals, her family background and her honesty.

It was all bullshit but the AFL acted on it and said ‘nothing to see here’ - in the case of Sayer’s dick they were almost right.

Mrs S has every right to want to see Luke AND the AFL degraded and humiliated in Court.

Then she can go Luke, the AFL and I hope, both legal counsel.

 

[Orfullrules]

I fail to see why Ms S wants this to play out in court. She will be extremely wealthy after the divorce settlement. Then again Mary Average would not have the funds to take this to the High Court.

Sometimes money isn’t everything

 

[western royboy]

I fail to see why Ms S wants this to play out in court. She will be extremely wealthy after the divorce settlement. Then again Mary Average would not have the funds to take this to the High Court.

You’re not familiar with the concept defamation I take it?

 

[The Blue Max]

Sometimes money isn’t everything

My god. Some sense.

Well said.

 

[Orfullrules]

My god. Some sense.

Well said.

Please don’t bring religion into the discussion.

 

[MarcusP2]

I fail to see why Ms S wants this to play out in court. She will be extremely wealthy after the divorce settlement. Then again Mary Average would not have the funds to take this to the High Court.

Her husband called her a crazy bipolar bitch off her meds to escape consequences.

She wants him to be forced to retract that, on the record, and humiliate him in the process. A settlement won't do that and she already has money.