When I saw that our second Wizard game was in Darwin I thought Mick might shift into 'I don't give a ******** about the result' mode. Sure enough he was in full experiment mode, King on the ball, Woey back pocket, just to name a few. So what did we learn? Williams is still a *******, Embley's first goal was a result of his dropped chest mark in the middle. And Zane Leonard looks like a contestant in a dwarf throwing contest. On the positive side, Maxwell might have moved past JCloke as a third tall defender. Freddy Fanning can get his hands on the ball, and Rhyce whilst still making the odd mistake featured in our best players. Remember Licca and Johnno people, although we did see quite a bit of the 'bad' Licca saturday, both turned it over a fair bit early days but rarely do today. Alot of the Malthouse experiments didn't work Saturday, but thats what we were doing experimenting, the result to me atleast, didn't seem to matter.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Malty lab 'experiment' blows up.
- Thread starter pieman1
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Losing wasn't such an issue. Looking that bad was a wory.
I would love someone to tell me what the magic number is. The number of ordinary games O'Bree and Williams have to play before the conclusion is drawn that they are not premiership material. We got rid of Rupe, Feeza, McKee and others becauese they had little upside and were a bit short of premiership material. Keeping O'Bree and Williams is nuts. Lokan I can at least understand a bit because he is newer to the caper.
Anyway, not much to get enthused about at all. We'll just have to wait and see how the real stuff goes. If we start poorly we must sift the list for tradables and delists. That should drive who we play each week. If we start well we have to go all out to win it while we have Buckley and Burns because when they go we are in trouble.
I would love someone to tell me what the magic number is. The number of ordinary games O'Bree and Williams have to play before the conclusion is drawn that they are not premiership material. We got rid of Rupe, Feeza, McKee and others becauese they had little upside and were a bit short of premiership material. Keeping O'Bree and Williams is nuts. Lokan I can at least understand a bit because he is newer to the caper.
Anyway, not much to get enthused about at all. We'll just have to wait and see how the real stuff goes. If we start poorly we must sift the list for tradables and delists. That should drive who we play each week. If we start well we have to go all out to win it while we have Buckley and Burns because when they go we are in trouble.
- Banned
- #3
MarkT said:
Your a disgrace mate, how about addressing the pathetic performance of your love child C Cloke rather than criticising mick malthouse?
MarkT's love child deserves criticising, but how about Mick's love children?
Willo: Finds new ways to *******ise relatively simple manourvers.
King: Who? Oh yeah, Godden Mach II. We flicked two far more talented boys than this bloke!
Leon: I reckon he's easily the worst "talented small aboriginal" playing the game today, and 90% of his competition got drafted within the past two years. But he's an automatic start for some reason; and midfield potential too, so I'm told!
O'Bree: I'm not as overly against O'Bree as others, but let's face it, if he was a colour, he'd be a beige-r shade of beige. I swear I nod off in the time he gets the ball and kicks it. To say he's ordinary is probably over selling his mediocrity!
Fact is, it was a Wizzer Cup game we didn't give a stuff about and it showed. Regardless, Malthouse threw in a million experiments, of which only the Fanny was the only success IMO. Malthouse also persisted; persisted with the serial no-hopers, in an attempt to salvage some hope, but they have proven us to be right.
I know you have a hard time having people critisise your love child, Michael Malthouse, but if you're allowed your opinion, then we're allowed ours!!
Willo: Finds new ways to *******ise relatively simple manourvers.
King: Who? Oh yeah, Godden Mach II. We flicked two far more talented boys than this bloke!
Leon: I reckon he's easily the worst "talented small aboriginal" playing the game today, and 90% of his competition got drafted within the past two years. But he's an automatic start for some reason; and midfield potential too, so I'm told!
O'Bree: I'm not as overly against O'Bree as others, but let's face it, if he was a colour, he'd be a beige-r shade of beige. I swear I nod off in the time he gets the ball and kicks it. To say he's ordinary is probably over selling his mediocrity!
Fact is, it was a Wizzer Cup game we didn't give a stuff about and it showed. Regardless, Malthouse threw in a million experiments, of which only the Fanny was the only success IMO. Malthouse also persisted; persisted with the serial no-hopers, in an attempt to salvage some hope, but they have proven us to be right.
I know you have a hard time having people critisise your love child, Michael Malthouse, but if you're allowed your opinion, then we're allowed ours!!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
FIGJAM said:
I thought long and hard for clever words to describe Willo as a player...........simply can't go past GUTLESS.
Similar threads
