- Joined
- Jun 30, 2014
- Posts
- 571
- Reaction score
- 1,465
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
This post is a disgrace. You know nothing about this woman. You know nothing of what happened to her or her motives. Regardless of where she 'placed herself', she is allowed the right to her own body, including the right to consent to whatever she feels appropriate. Anything she did not consent to is, by every definition, rape. Now I know the case in question isn't as black and white as that, but your logic in defending Milne is completely out of place.
There's not a single reasonable person who doesn't believe this, I don't think. I'm not entirely sure that poster was suggesting that they can't say no, simply that it seems unlikely that you would engage in "minor" sexual acts and then refuse further. If she legitimately refused, he is clearly in the wrong, I think that other poster may have been suggesting it unlikely, even though possible of course.
The most unfortunate thing about the resolution of the case is that nothing definitive has been determined either way. He plead guilty to a lesser charge in reality in face of a lack of evidence. That isn't to say he didn't do it, just that we don't know. To anyone who hasn't followed the case i.e. 95% of people, then he will forever be labeled.
Again, what he is accused of is incredible wrong and ought to be punished if it could be determined that was what happened.





