Nat Fyfe's 2015 vs Patrick Dangerfield's 2016

[Elite Master]

Career best seasons for both players rewarded with many individual honors including Brownlow Medals. Who had the more standout year when compared?

 

[jakefooty23]

Fyfe

 

[Kenny_01]

Fyfe's best was better (Think he had 88 coaches association votes after 10 games). He got injured though in Rd 14 and played the rest of the season injured including missing 4 games so Danger's year overall probably just eclipsed Fyfe.

 

[PerfectFooty]

Fyfe was better because he didn't get cheap possessions by sharing it around with is captain

 

[Sando22]

Fyfe for me

 

[Canada]

Fyfes best was extroadinary.
Clearly he.

 

[Lethality]

Fyfe's 2015 was better. Danger's form seemed partly as a result of Geelong's lack of midfield depth.

 

[1990crow]

Fyfe. Fyfes best is better and more influential. Loved Danger but Fyfe brought everyone else around him into it.

 

[Madman2Gresham]

Armitage for me

 

[juss]

Going with Dangerfield's 2016, but both outstanding individual seasons.

 

[FISTO]

Dangerfield (not biased, just my honest opinion)

 

[Jade]

Fyfe. His 2015 was magic.

Danger was the best player this year, no doubt.