Remove this Banner Ad

Certified Legendary Thread Nathan Freeman Updates

  • Thread starter Thread starter SK_MD_#7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Defacto said:
What a great alignment this is.
Click to expand...

Meh, can't imagine the extra week is going to make any difference in the grand scheme of things. If anything it makes the comeback even more conservative, which isn't a bad thing, and hopefully stokes his motivation fires even further.
 
bergholt said:
Meh, can't imagine the extra week is going to make any difference in the grand scheme of things. If anything it makes the comeback even more conservative, which isn't a bad thing, and hopefully stokes his motivation fires even further.
Click to expand...
So two weeks off is desirable now?
 
bergholt said:
NFI, I'm not a physio, but surely they can tell him to run up a hill carrying his shopping or something.
Click to expand...
Hasnt he already been doing that? Isnt the whole point of him playing to get touch... but because of the cap and the bye he cant do that...

You dont see an issue with that? Because of some soft sandy egos
 
Defacto said:
Hasnt he already been doing that? Isnt the whole point of him playing to get touch... but because of the cap and the bye he cant do that...

You dont see an issue with that? Because of some soft sandy egos
Click to expand...

Completely agree with you. Sandy management have been coming across as complete a**holes to work with over the past few years. I guess that could be because I'm viewing this arrangement as a Saints supporter so there is a bit of bias. Apparently, we screwed them over a few years ago and so, we got this stupid restriction on our players playing for them. However, last year it was pretty clear that our youngsters were levels above theirs and they were losing out by forcing some of our boys into the Dev League. And now this.

Stand-alone can't come quickly enough.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Masquerade said:
Completely agree with you. Sandy management have been coming across as complete a**holes to work with over the past few years. I guess that could be because I'm viewing this arrangement as a Saints supporter so there is a bit of bias. Apparently, we screwed them over a few years ago and so, we got this stupid restriction on our players playing for them. However, last year it was pretty clear that our youngsters were levels above theirs and they were losing out by forcing some of our boys into the Dev League. And now this.

Stand-alone can't come quickly enough.
Click to expand...
Happy to take couple hundred k minimum from us but want some shitty cap at the same time. What a joke
 
How much power does Sandy have in who plays?
Is it us or them that have final say in the Saints players playing for them?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

jonathons11 said:
How much power does Sandy have in who plays?
Is it us or them that have final say in the Saints players playing for them?
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure it's us who chooses who they just have capped numbers. It's a dumb system having two teams aligned with opposite goals but it's not their fault. It was the AFL who tried to be cheap and move the VFL and AFL reserves together into one.
 
Masquerade said:
Completely agree with you. Sandy management have been coming across as complete a**holes to work with over the past few years. I guess that could be because I'm viewing this arrangement as a Saints supporter so there is a bit of bias. Apparently, we screwed them over a few years ago and so, we got this stupid restriction on our players playing for them. However, last year it was pretty clear that our youngsters were levels above theirs and they were losing out by forcing some of our boys into the Dev League. And now this.

Stand-alone can't come quickly enough.
Click to expand...
Two sides to every story.
We just need a stand alone reserves team ASAP.
 
gringo2011 said:
I'm pretty sure it's us who chooses who they just have capped numbers. It's a dumb system having two teams aligned with opposite goals but it's not their fault. It was the AFL who tried to be cheap and move the VFL and AFL reserves together into one.
Click to expand...


Only because the clubs wanted the cheap option and anyway that's a long time ago. I'd be pretty sure both clubs decide the cap. We would no cap. They probably want 10 or 12. We have come up with 15. It's time to get out on our own. Unfortunately it won't be until at least 2018
 
Masquerade said:
Completely agree with you. Sandy management have been coming across as complete a**holes to work with over the past few years. I guess that could be because I'm viewing this arrangement as a Saints supporter so there is a bit of bias. Apparently, we screwed them over a few years ago and so, we got this stupid restriction on our players playing for them. However, last year it was pretty clear that our youngsters were levels above theirs and they were losing out by forcing some of our boys into the Dev League. And now this.

Stand-alone can't come quickly enough.
Click to expand...


stop blaming Sandy,
none of Sandy doesn't want freeman playing for a half a game has been proven.
at the moment its just a rumour by plugger 66
 
Sandy have named Pierce, Longer, Lonie, Membrey, Acres, Webster, Dunstan, Templeton, Wright, Goddard, Murdoch, Delaney, Holmes, Minchington, Saunders, White, McKenzie, Shenton, Gresham, Curren & Rice (21) in their 31 man squad for their match on Sunday. St Kilda will take 4-6 of those for their match on Sunday (interchange and 1-2 hold out emergencies).
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom