Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch Ned Long

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

16 centre bounce attendances last night …
Didn’t win a single one of them.

That’s his bread and butter and his contest stuff is poor

How can he be poor overhead for a player his size?

Why is he not giving first give and trying to break through every tackle?

Another low metres gained game too.

As mid …he can’t just be a “big body”

He needs to start playing like one and one that is worthy of all the minutes on ball he is getting that others aren’t.
The dominant tap ruckman played for Adelaide & was able to most of the time hit to advantage. The other aspect to consider is that Long may have had a specific role to play within the centre bounce. Stats without context can be misleading.

No one is saying he is playing well. However, in the not playing well category, Long is by long way (sadly) not the only member of this group at Collingwood, after two AFL matches in 2026.
 
Ned's stats 2025 Round 12 to Round 24

Centre Bounce Attendances/Centre clearances

Screenshot_20260315-122731~2.webp
Edit:
That's Guiness Book of Records poor territory!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20260315-122941.webp
    Screenshot_20260315-122941.webp
    47.8 KB · Views: 6
Last edited:
Ned's stats 2025 Round 12 to Round 24

Centre Bounce Attendances/Centre clearances

View attachment 2551993
Edit:
That's Guiness Book of Records poor territory!
The assumption is that his role is to win centre clearances. I thought his role was to allow N Daicos and others to win the clearance by providing physical protection by blocking others and using his body etc. His role also includes stopping an opposition player or players from clearances or being effective in the centre clearance function. So if winning centre clearances is not his primary role or even his second role then the stats you supplied have little meaning. Again context and the correct set of stats are important here.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The assumption is that his role is to win centre clearances. I thought his role was to allow N Daicos and others to win the clearance by providing physical protection by blocking others and using his body etc. His role also includes stopping an opposition player or players from clearances or being effective in the centre clearance function. So if winning centre clearances is not his primary role or even his second role then the stats you supplied have little meaning. Again context and the correct set of stats are important here.
My assumption is Ned's role is to win games and the stats provided IMO is evidence to suggest Ned's role sucks or possibly Ned is not so good at his role!
 
My assumption is Ned's role is to win games and the stats provided IMO is evidence to suggest Ned's role sucks or possibly Ned is not so good at his role!
I can understand your opinion but your stats didn't prove the point. Ned also played played quite a few good games last year.
 
Can believe the BS here - Long turned the game in the third QTR in the Adel final and was superb - and lauded by all. On that day he wasn’t slow, or a poor decision maker, or turnover merchant - he was elite in a clutch game, when it needed someone to stand up.

Now he has 2 poor games and he’s a spud.
You people need to get a grip.

WHY do we have to pretend that Long was good last year? He was absolutely rubbish for large periods and had 1 good final. The problem with long is he has poor games constantly and his poor games are very very bad
 
WHY do we have to pretend that Long was good last year? He was absolutely rubbish for large periods and had 1 good final. The problem with long is he has poor games constantly and his poor games are very very bad
The point is, people after 2 games are forgetting his good periods.
 
If he is in the side, would rather see him line up at CHF then ever being in a centre square set up again, at 194cm, he can’t do much worse than what has been dished up by our current forwards, and will be more competitive against players his size when the ball hits the ground
As a starting mid, he is too slow, too reactionary, might work in heavy conditions where the ball is slippery, but not on a quick deck. I’m sure Naicos could do just as well without him. Play Perryman there as your defensive mid, clean hands and composure is something he has, Long will never have it consistently
 
Ned's stats 2025 Round 12 to Round 24

Centre Bounce Attendances/Centre clearances

View attachment 2551993
Edit:
That's Guiness Book of Records poor territory!

And we wonder why we lose centre clearances so often, that is damning. We basically starting one short in there 🤷‍♂️
I’m glad the stats are backing what I am seeing each week, unfortunately
 
And we wonder why we lose centre clearances so often, that is damning. We basically starting one short in there 🤷‍♂️
I’m glad the stats are backing what I am seeing each week, unfortunately
Exactly, those stats are just confirming what we're all watching.
 
Apart from a few good games early last season he has been nothing but a boiled potato.. this season he has been mashed potato,
 

Remove this Banner Ad

When Ned is surpassed by an “elite” mid then he’ll obviously be dropped.

Straight up, is Perryman a better mid option than Long?
I think any sensible person knows this to be true

Already that improves our centre square set up, but nah, let’s have faith in the guy that can’t get the job done ,he has had 5 centre clearances in his last 14 games after contesting 190 centre bounces. So he has a 2.5% strike rate
Enough is enough
 
Straight up, is Perryman a better mid option than Long?
I think any sensible person knows this to be true

Already that improves our centre square set up, but nah, let’s have faith in the guy that can’t get the job done ,he has had 5 centre clearances in his last 14 games after contesting 190 centre bounces. So he has a 2.5% strike rate
Enough is enough
Haven’t you answered your own question- he’s going to CB for other reasons eg block for mids eg Nick. That singular metric of CB clearances may not be Fly’s main KPI for Long, otherwise he’d be dropped.
 
Haven’t you answered your own question- he’s going to CB for other reasons eg block for mids eg Nick. That singular metric of CB clearances may not be Fly’s main KPI for Long, otherwise he’d be dropped.
Clearly that ain’t working because centre clearances have been a problem
Having a guy in there running at 2.5% success rate ain’t helping anyone

Noticed you couldn’t answer the question about Perryman being a better option than Long
It would suck to be wrong 🙄
 
The point is, you seem to constantly forget that for most of 2025 Long was very mediocre and had quite a few very poor games
His best is very good, and he’s down on form. If Anderson kills it in the VFL then we’ll have a great selection problem. Until then I can’t see Long being dropped.
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Clearly that ain’t working because centre clearances have been a problem
Having a guy in there running at 2.5% success rate ain’t helping anyone

Noticed you couldn’t answer the question about Perryman being a better option than Long
It would suck to be wrong 🙄
I actually think Long has far more KPI’s than CB clearances - so that’s why I hesitate to agree Perryman is a better option. Plus he’s thriving in his current role - so if “it ain’t broke don’t fix it”.
I’d rather Anderson prove himself and create competition for Longs position.
 
When Ned has a good game, we tend to win. His first half of 2025 helped us enormously.

Unfortunately, those games in the second half of the season were more average than good.

He needs to get back to his early 2025 form, otherwise we need to change that mix in the middle.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom