NUFC Tiger
Brownlow Medallist
- Apr 25, 2011
- 18,678
- 16,987
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- NUFC, Socceroos, FGR, NewcastleJets
If Auckland city did join football NZ would have to play ball. They are by far the strongest side here and with them gone football development is all headed towards two academies (Phoenix and Auckland City) that aren't in their comps.
Football NZ is very incompetent though and I wouldn't hold my breath on them making smart moves and moving into Asia and embracing the a league more than they do. An Auckland team would be the best thing to happen to the Phoenix
Yeah I believe I normally see Auckland City representing Oceania at the World Club Championships quite regularly. I seem to recall the FFA and Football NZ butting heads over the Phoenix licence renewal because FNZ weren't willing to step in and provide more resources and assistance. I'm not sure how many NZ players are at the Phoenix currently and across the league in general, but if they did introduce an Auckland based side, that should only further improve the opportunities for NZ footballers to play professionally (as the NZ League is a semi professional league IIRC?).
I remember reading an article during the last round or world cup qualifying playoffs on whether the All Whites should follow Australia into Asia. Though surprisingly, I think many of the comments favoured the traditional playoff route over the more rigourous AFC route.
Another New Zealand team? They are utterly pointless. The A-League shouldn't be catering to the expansion of bloody New Zealand; the A-League is an Australian competition followed by Australians.
I was saying this to a mate the other day, but a game against the Phoenix is essentially a bye – nobody has any interest in going to watch their team play Wellington. The reality is, people need a reason to go a game in this country: the Phoenix offer absolutely nothing. They're never successful so it's not like the top two or three teams can cash in on a top-of-the-table clash, they have no connection meaning there's no actual rivalry or derby involving them, and their team consists of has-been hacks – they've never had a quality marquee and never will.
When you bring in a new team, it has to actually offer something. Obviously derbies are the trendy new go-to, but there has to be some sort of allure for the 'away' fan as well. This is why I have almost no issue in having more New South Wales teams, simply because an ultra-vibrant culture of travelling an hour to Sydney, Newcastle, Gosford, Cronulla, the Gong, whatever, is something that could really grow rusted-on support. Adding in a Wollongong Wolves, 'Sutherland Saints' (playing out of Cronulla and WIN Jubilee), North Sydney would be fine by me.
As for Brisbane 2, I did lol massively at Miron Bleiberg talking it all up. Do people not see through this? No substantial backers have ever been discussed for a second team there, but old mate Miron suddenly leaches onto some people who probably threw up the idea over a boozy lunch and suddenly he's gone 'oh yeah, there's a job for me here!' Miron is a shocking coach who is so irrelevant to the sport, and now he sees the idea of a new Queensland team as a job opportunity for him. The gall.
I think if you chucked a team up there, it'd have to be substantially different to the Roar, and as there's no real geographic divide, I think a second team could/should operate as an admittedly 'boutique' one. Run on a smaller scale, play at a pretty ground (if any exists?), and bring people in that way – sell yourself as the community club, the family club: $15 tickets and perhaps a majority Queensland roster. The Roar can set themselves up as the successful club and the bling bling club: The Victory and Sydney FC equivalent.
Also how could anyone seriously advocate a Wollongong club not to be named Wollongong Wolves? FFS the name is so cool, the imagery is there, everyone knows the name, it'd revive the derby with the Glory without needing to manufacture it, and nobody seemingly hates them in the area. They weren't ethnic, they didn't have a fat magnate bankrolling them, they've produced a few Socceroos, and people really like the idea of rebirth and continued lineage. Also, people who live an hour away from Wollongong proper aren't going to refuse to support a new team because they're 'Wollongong' and not 'Illawarra' – people in Albany, Geraldton, Busselton, Bunbury, Broome have no problem supporting the Perth Glory, Perth Wildcats, or Perth Scorchers – or even Fremantle Dockers – so these stupid all-encampassing names can go and get left behind in the marketing meeting floors they were born on.
Also, why is Perth overlooked for a second team? In 15 years it'll have the population of Brisbane and in 30 it'll be bigger. The growth rate is steady but more importantly, the sprawl of the city means we're seeing big geographic differences. There are also a huge percentage of Poms in Perth – and 90% of them live from Joondalup to Clarkson and Butler. I think it'd be a left-field, but really good, idea to set them up. They'd play at Arena Joondalup and try and rope in as many Poms as possible: ffs make them wear royal blue and call them the Lions or something.
I do agree that in an ideal world we'd have more Aussie teams but I think if an Auckland bid comes through - and the investors can guarantee they're in for the long haul and will support the club, then there's no real issue. Ultimately, if the bid is feasible and sustainable, that should be the main thing. As long as they don't drain FFA resources, it should be fine. More teams means more commercial revenue and sponsorship opportunities. It could also strengthen the hand of the FFA in future television deal negotiations.
The onus should be on more investors starting new clubs up in Australia (rather than the FFA creating puppet clubs in growth markets IMO). Like with the proposed second Brisbane team - the investors would submit a proposal to the FFA and then the FFA would need to determine if it would work or not and then sign off on it.