Schulzenfest
TheBrownDog
Ah ok. You asked for an example of what North could have done to improve the offer given their position. I suggested they could have traded Greenwood as an example. I too don't know if we even wanted him in the first place or if we even inquired about him. Either way, Greenwood is contracted and wasn't one of the duds North tried to heap on us so he would have been off the table. Does that make Greenwood a required player? Well he is contracted and North claimed him as required but he only played 5 games in 2012 - maybe he's required for depth. I used the Greenwood example because he appears to be on the outer at North and there were whispers that he'd very happily return to SA. It was only ever an example of a way North could have improved their offer not what they should have done.
Well that's the thing, you can't just make blanket statements about how somebody 'screwed' you without offering an alternative of what you would've done better in their position. Whether pick 37 is fair value for Jacobs or not, I find it hard to see what North should've done differently without unnecessarily disadvantaging themselves. If they'd had a pick in the late 20's at their disposal then you could possibly argue that they didn't trade in good faith, but they didn't have that pick.