The Sunday 11th phase of BigFooty's maintenance and upgrade has been completed. Reactions are limited for now. Search is rebuilding. Scheduled Posts are back! Other upgraded features may look/operate slightly different. The styling and colours will change over time.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Someone is getting their jollies off, * I hope they get over confident
I hope they got caught!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
www.afl.com.au
I fully agree with the lynch decision.What a coincidence..the 2 players who get off their charges just happen to be Richmond and Carlton players...both appealed at the tribunal and both won and both players hit the heads of their opponents and Lynch left his opponent concussed...where was the 'potential to cause injury' penalty factor there??
My word, its one rule for us and another for the big Vic clubs and all within the very same competition. Said it before and I will say it again, Silvers should be on the phone to Gil giving him the biggest serve over this and making the point that should we get victimised again at the tribunal for stuff they would never wipe out the vic boys for, our legal team will be going the injunction route rather than wasting time at the tribunal
BLOG RECAP: All the action as Blues forward, Tiger learn fate
Carlton's Harry McKay and Richmond's Tom Lynch faced the Tribunal on Tuesday night
Lynch gets off as well!
Tom Lynch has also had his case dismissed by the Tribunal.
Chairman Jeff Gleeson said Lynch intended to fly for the mark and once he realised he misjudged it, kept his eyes on the ball and then braced for contact.
"He did not bump and he did not engage in rough conduct," Gleeson said.
Lynch off and McKay off – what a night for the power forwards.
Full story on AFL.com.au shortly.
- Michael Whiting
I don't..not after what they did to McAdam and by extension us. why should we get the rank bad decision and the vic clubs get the free pass.. I'd rather McAdam had got off, then I'd be much more sympathetic to vic club players hitting opposition player heads and causing concussion and getting away with it
I just don't think the AFL should be able to look at the other decisions without the McAdam decision regardless of whether they consider precedent or not. They made an example of the least bad bump that round and we lost r best medium forward for 3 weeks. So nah, I want any indiscretion by the vic boys to be treated as harshly as we were treated as thats fair..not what we saw tonight regardless
No but they make it even
Could be the same person, using burner Social Media accounts.
After/During Draft Trade Period where clubs and players can agree to swap to another club on the day for picks or player
I think he thinks he’s bulletproof proof, needs to be sat down and find out what reality is
He's about to find out the hard way.
As it has always been Kane.
I'm thinking it's the same person(s)....
I would have thought that if the offence is classified correctly in the first place, then that determines the penalty. The MRO can't just classify it upwards (to the tribunal) because they think the penalty should be higher. That's supposed to be the point of the classification system.
