2nds NON-Crows SANFL Chat

[cleanhands]

Cause hes injured. Not because of the mid season draft. I am glad we didn't lose three of our best. Imagine losing Lowe, F Heard and Rokahr.

Draft/injured still unavailable

 

[Cromulant]

Cause hes injured. Not because of the mid season draft. I am glad we didn't lose three of our best. Imagine losing Lowe, F Heard and Rokahr.

Thought Heard might have been a chance, Lowe doesnt have the weapons and Rokahr has a bit of the Tom Lewis' about him.

 

[Velvet George]

Well the Eagles lost 3 of their very best players that AFL clubs deemed AFL quality possibly including 2 Key Position Defenders, how many did Norwood lose?

So they have no depth, thanks for confirming

 

[Punchy Bassett]

I would have taken F Heard before Van Wyk

 

[Mutineer]

Was unavailable today dopey

And WWT were also without best 22 players due to injury. See what I did there.
Jack Hayes
Riley Knight
Max Lister
Jack Wheare
Kobe Mutch

 

[cleanhands]

And WWT were also without best 22 players due to injury. See what I did there.
Jack Hayes
Riley Knight
Max Lister
Jack Wheare
Kobe Mutch

Yeh have a crack at Norwood every opportunity you get

 

[Mutineer]

Yeh have a crack at Norwood every opportunity you get

Like you have a crack at South at every opportunity you get....like that?

 

[cleanhands]

Like you have a crack at South at every opportunity you get....like that?

31

 

[Velvet George]

Like you have a crack at South at every opportunity you get....like that?

Who? Is there a club down South in the comp?

 

[cleanhands]

Who? Is there a club down South in the comp?

Not of relevance

 

[Drugs Are Bad Mackay?]

Greater compensation to clubs for players drafted is an interesting one.

It used to be that if an SANFL club had a player drafted they would be paid directly. The more players a club had drafted, the more money they received.

The SANFL clubs themselves voted against this system. The weaker clubs argued that it rewarded the strong clubs too much and the gap widened. All clubs said that it was an unpredictable revenue stream so hard to budget.

So it was scrapped.

Now the SANFL clubs just get a flat fee across the board, no matter how good or crap they are. Easier for budgeting I'm sure but if WWT is decimated by losing three players at once... the SANFL club's compensation system is to go **** yourselves. This is the system the SANFL clubs wanted.

 

[Cromulant]

Greater compensation to clubs for players drafted is an interesting one.

It used to be that if an SANFL club had a player drafted they would be paid directly. The more players a club had drafted, the more money they received.

The SANFL clubs themselves voted against this system. The weaker clubs argued that it rewarded the strong clubs too much and the gap widened. All clubs said that it was an unpredictable revenue stream so hard to budget.

So it was scrapped.

Now the SANFL clubs just get a flat fee across the board, no matter how good or crap they are. Easier for budgeting I'm sure but if WWT is decimated by losing three players at once... the SANFL club's compensation system is to go **** yourselves. This is the system the SANFL clubs wanted.

Traditionally "weaker" clubs like South and West have had quite a number of players drafted in the last decade or 2, it seems very strange you'd want to vote against a system that gives you a monetary benefit from that.