I believe these three combined give the best indication of the strength of a team.
Your overall team value is the ceiling for your team. A team with a higher overall value reflects one that has utilised trading better, or one that has picked better starting players.
However, trades in hand must be accounted for. Obviously it's easier to increase team value if you've used 8 trades than if you've only used 4. And trades in hand are necessary to convert your overall team value, a lot of which is invested in cash cows, to on-field team value, through upgrades.
On-field team value (take away last week's non-scoring players) is the current measure of how good your team is, and is the best way to compare which team will win in the next round.
**Of course this doesn't take into account predictable rises. Eg someone with Ibbotson (232K) is a lot better off than someone with Nicoski (180K?) even though their current difference is only 50 something thousand.
That said, what's everyone's stats in this department? It's interesting to convert them into rough point scores, by using the formula 1 dt point = $4,100 (I believe that's a close approximation...tell me if I'm wrong.)
Your overall team value is the ceiling for your team. A team with a higher overall value reflects one that has utilised trading better, or one that has picked better starting players.
However, trades in hand must be accounted for. Obviously it's easier to increase team value if you've used 8 trades than if you've only used 4. And trades in hand are necessary to convert your overall team value, a lot of which is invested in cash cows, to on-field team value, through upgrades.
On-field team value (take away last week's non-scoring players) is the current measure of how good your team is, and is the best way to compare which team will win in the next round.
**Of course this doesn't take into account predictable rises. Eg someone with Ibbotson (232K) is a lot better off than someone with Nicoski (180K?) even though their current difference is only 50 something thousand.
That said, what's everyone's stats in this department? It's interesting to convert them into rough point scores, by using the formula 1 dt point = $4,100 (I believe that's a close approximation...tell me if I'm wrong.)




