Patrick Dangerfield vs Nat Fyfe?

[Bailey01]

Thoughts?

 

[Susan_Boyle14]

I'm biased, but I'll go with Fyfe.

 

[Rainfall]

2012 - Dangerfield
2013 - Fyfe

 

[Tragic sainter]

Dangerfield. Som much raw power!

 

[Bulldog1954]

Love Fyfe, absolute gun but Dangerfields disposal wins it for me

 

[thetradesman]

Both stars but I'll have to say Fyfe just.

 

[port_adelaide_1870]

2012 - Dangerfield
2013 - Fyfe

This

 

[Big Tom 2013]

Tricky one, Dangerfield just

 

[Fitzey]

Dangerfield, don't really rate Fyfe with him.

 

[FreoGirl]

Fyfe is only going to get even better with age/experience

 

[Tragic sainter]

Fyfe is only going to get even better with age/experience

And dangerfield won't?

 

[22 others]

And dangerfield won't?

Dangerfield was drafted two years before Fyfe. When Danger was 21 he was nowhere near Fyfe's level.

 

[Bailey01]

Dangerfield was drafted two years before Fyfe. When Danger was 21 he was nowhere near Fyfe's level.

Because he was playing much more forward than midfield.

 

[headache1]

Dangerfield was drafted two years before Fyfe. When Danger was 21 he was nowhere near Fyfe's level.

He was also drafted as a 17 year old and spent his first year in the AFL in Victoria completing high school. Anyway, using that logic, I suppose Brad Crouch is going to make both of them look average?

 

[22 others]

He was also drafted as a 17 year old and spent his first year in the AFL in Victoria completing high school. Anyway, using that logic, I suppose Brad Crouch is going to make both of them look average?

Well it would be fair to say he has more room for improvement due to his current age/experience. FWIW I think Danger currently is slightly ahead of Fyfe. When they both hit their prime they will be the two best mids going around.

 

[Ed_Gein]

Tricky one. I went Dangerfield because of his explosive power. Fyfe's disposal hurts him a lot, but if he fixes that up, i wouldn't put it past him being a top 3 player in the comp.

 

[Kenny_01]

Tricky one. I went Dangerfield because of his explosive power. Fyfe's disposal hurts him a lot, but if he fixes that up, i wouldn't put it past him being a top 3 player in the comp.

Paul Roos already thinks Fyfe is the 4th best player in the competition. Saw it in the HUN last week.

 

[Stifler's mom]

Dangerfield will be the number 1 player in the AFL within 12 months.

 

[Tragic sainter]

Paul Roos already thinks Fyfe is the 4th best player in the competition. Saw it in the HUN last week.

Paul Roos is a flog.

 

[eth-dog]

Danger. better kick

 

[DangerSloane]

Danger is also a big game player.
While Fyfe played well in the grand final, he choked on his usually good set shots.

 

[FalcoX]

Tough poll considering so far they have both performed at a similar level with both having had two high quality seasons, though Dangerfield is about 1.5 years older. Their stats are quite identical too in most areas so going to vote for Fyfe as I feel he has a greater scope for improvement.

Danger is also a big game player.
While Fyfe played well in the grand final, he choked on his usually good set shots.

So is Fyfe, was in our top 2-3 over the finals series, and clear BOG against Sydney.The crowd was more than twice as big as any he had played in front of before so yeah that probably got in his head, willing to cut him some slack though he will be all the better for it.

Love Fyfe, absolute gun but Dangerfields disposal wins it for me

Tricky one. I went Dangerfield because of his explosive power. Fyfe's disposal hurts him a lot, but if he fixes that up, i wouldn't put it past him being a top 3 player in the comp.

Danger. better kick

Terrible reason to choose Dangerfield considering he is prone to shanks and poor disposal too. Try watching games instead of going off media hype.

FYI, here is the disposal efficiency for last 2 seasons where they played 80%+ games:

2013 - Fyfe 63.3%, Dangerfield 63.5%
2012 - Dangerfield: 62.9%
2011 - Fyfe: 61.4%

 

[Tragic sainter]

Tough poll considering so far they have both performed at a similar level with both having had two high quality seasons, though Dangerfield is about 1.5 years older. Their stats are quite identical too in most areas so going to vote for Fyfe as I feel he has a greater scope for improvement.



So is Fyfe, was in our top 2-3 over the finals series, and clear BOG against Sydney.The crowd was more than twice as big as any he had played in front of before so yeah that probably got in his head, willing to cut him some slack though he will be all the better for it.





Terrible reason to choose Dangerfield considering he is prone to shanks and poor disposal too. Try watching games instead of going off media hype.

FYI, here is the disposal efficiency for last 2 seasons where they played 80%+ games:

2013 - Fyfe 63.3%, Dangerfield 63.5%
2012 - Dangerfield: 62.9%
2011 - Fyfe: 61.4%

Fyfe is the number 1 turnover merchant in the league. Fact.

 

[UmpiringFooty]

Patrick Dangerfield won the Gilette sprint for the third time. That stat alone proves that danger is naturally quick

 

[DangerSloane]

Tough poll considering so far they have both performed at a similar level with both having had two high quality seasons, though Dangerfield is about 1.5 years older. Their stats are quite identical too in most areas so going to vote for Fyfe as I feel he has a greater scope for improvement.

So is Fyfe, was in our top 2-3 over the finals series, and clear BOG against Sydney.The crowd was more than twice as big as any he had played in front of before so yeah that probably got in his head, willing to cut him some slack though he will be all the better for it.

Terrible reason to choose Dangerfield considering he is prone to shanks and poor disposal too. Try watching games instead of going off media hype.

FYI, here is the disposal efficiency for last 2 seasons where they played 80%+ games:

2013 - Fyfe 63.3%, Dangerfield 63.5%
2012 - Dangerfield: 62.9%
2011 - Fyfe: 61.4%

I actually agree wiht you re: disposal.
However saying Fyfe has more potential is simply wrong.