Remove this Banner Ad

Religion Pell Guilty!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Colonial
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Kummerspeck said:
Bruce, you knew homophobia in football was almost non-existent because you hadn't experienced it. What you know tends to be what you really want.
Click to expand...

Geez you’re harking back. I believe homophobia amongst footballers is almost non existent. Players don’t give a shit. Mob supporters? Not so much. Mobs hate ****s, abos, Joos, Cathlicks, whatever is in season.
 
BruceFromBalnarring said:
It took me years to accept she was not guilty. Years. Until I read the case for myself. I was sucked in by the media hype.
Click to expand...
So you could be over correcting for your previous view (re lindy)
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Gough said:
Do you think it's simply an error in law or something deeper than that?
Click to expand...
No, he believes the accuser is lying. He said it in this thread.
 
BruceFromBalnarring said:
No. But good try. He didn’t do it.
Click to expand...
Again you are stating opinion as fact. This is incorrect and you are showing arrogance to know “better” than the court, unwilling to acknowledge your inherent bias.
 
BruceFromBalnarring said:
Geez you’re harking back. I believe homophobia amongst footballers is almost non existent.
Click to expand...

That's nice, but you argued that homophobia in football was almost non existent, not just amongst players and your basis was solely your personal experience. That's the point, you seem to struggle separating what you want to believe from objective fact.
 
BruceFromBalnarring said:
No. I’m stating a fact. He didn’t do it. There’s no arrogance in saying what you know.
Click to expand...
You can't possibly know that unless you were there when the alleged incident took place.

Were you?
 
BruceFromBalnarring said:
No. I’m stating a fact. He didn’t do it. There’s no arrogance in saying what you know.
Click to expand...
No it is arogrance that you think you know more than the evidence provided in court, evidence that was tested and proven correct.

I doubt you’ll change your mind but I struggle to understand your postition here that your belief is “fact”.

Mind boggling stuff
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Bumpswithagrin said:
Juries can get it wrong and the more I read about the evidence the more I am convinced that in this case they are. As others have pointed out, too many coincidental things would have had to have taken place for the scenario put forward to have happened. I am baffled as to how the jury could have convicted in this case.

I want to see every pedophile priest behind bars but I don't want to see an innocent man put away just because there are many others that have done these vile acts. That does not help the cause one iota.
Click to expand...

The jury saw the evidence in full whereas Pell's supporters in sections of the media are running an active campaign to cloud the picture by grabbing at anything and everything to make it look like Pell is innocent.

Pell should have taken the stand but didn't and if the boy's evidence was as weak as Pell's supporters are claiming then how did Richer QC, one of this country's best legal minds fail to take it apart.
 
Bombermania said:
The jury saw the evidence in full whereas Pell's supporters in sections of the media are running an active campaign to cloud the picture by grabbing at anything and everything to make it look like Pell is innocent.

Pell should have taken the stand but didn't and if the boy's evidence was as weak as Pell's supporters are claiming then how did Richer QC, one of this country's best legal minds fail to take it apart.
Click to expand...
Because it's true. Pell is a rapist.
 
BruceFromBalnarring said:
I know the crime as alleged is impossible. I therefore refuse to acknowledge that he is anything but innocent of the crime.

He is innocent.
Click to expand...

How do you know that to be a fact? where you there, did you hear all the evidence or are you employed by Pell's legal team or the church's PR team?

You seem to have a stake in this case that goes beyond simply supporting Pell.
 
Bombermania said:
How do you know that to be a fact? where you there, did you hear all the evidence or are you employed by Pell's legal team or the church's PR team?

Yoy seem to you have a stake in this case that goes beyond simply supporting Pell.
Click to expand...
Maybe he is Pell...
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Bombermania said:
How do you know that to be a fact? where you there, did you hear all the evidence or are you employed by Pell's legal team or the church's PR team?

You seem to have a stake in this case that goes beyond simply supporting Pell.
Click to expand...
When Gillard announced the RC into paedos Bruce loudly argued that it shouldn’t go ahead.

The only logical conclusion after many years (years!) of denialism and obfuscation is that Bruce is a paedo himself.
 
gordo2016 said:
He sounds like a freak of nature. We have had some victims on here and only a piece of shit would keep going on with this the way he has.
Click to expand...
That's how I am starting to think about him as well.

You'd think common decency would tell you to pull back a bit.
 
its free real estate said:
When Gillard announced the RC into paedos Bruce loudly argued that it shouldn’t go ahead.

The only logical conclusion after many years (years!) of denialism and obfuscation is that Bruce is a paedo himself.
Click to expand...

Not sure I argued that loudly that it shouldn’t go ahead. I certainly worried it would become the mob hunt it has become.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

Osho
    • Like
USA Daniel Penny Not Guilty
Replies
4
Views
705
Osho
Osho

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom