Engimal v3
Premium Gold
I think we should let Port Adelaide die
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The 2014 SANFL/AFL agreement is a complex arrangement but basically the SANFL has drawn up a set of rules that are supposed to guard against the prospect of the two AFL Clubs dominating the SANFL. There are a range of restrictions including the number of non AFL players the two AFL clubs can recruit to supplement their AFL lists in the SANFL, a qualification on players eligibility to play in the SANFL finals. The other eight SANFL clubs have few restrictions other than a salary cap. The AFL clubs are not permitted under age sides in the SANFL U19 competition and as a consequence they have lost the ability to bring juniors up through the ranks within the club. Father & son prospects such as Jackson Mead, Jase Burgoyne and several others play their junior football for opposition SANFL clubs prior to being drafted.
As posted the issue is complex and only someone supporting an AFL club in SA would appreciate the difficulty. I am sure that Port would love to establish and arrangement like Fremantle have with Peel Thunder in the WAFL but the SANFL rules will not allow it. I have no idea what the relationship between the WAFL and WCE and Freo is like but in South Australia there has always been resentment between Port Adelaide and the SANFL. A lot of this stems from Port's initial bid to join the AFL which was blocked by the other nine SANFL clubs. Prior to 2014 Port's AFL licence was owned by the SANFL and part of the deal for the SANFL to cede the Port Adelaide AFL licence to Port, where it should have always been, was for Port to agree to a range of conditions which inhibited the Club's ability to be competitive in the State league.
Port Adelaide and Adelaide joining the VFL may not be a panacea but at least all AFL clubs fielding sides in the VFL will do so on an equal footing.
For what purpose? To keep the Magpies alive? Seems like a needless expense and further complication to me.I'd have no real issue if the club was still to field an SANFL model if they join an AFL reserves comp, but it would require the SANFL to give the zones back & accept that it's all essentially run by an AFL club.. highly unlikely with SA football politics.
I don't think anyone under 40 would give two shits about the 'keeping the magpies alive' aspect tbh, but Koch has said we could field AFL reserves & an SANFL team before with a "why can't we?".For what purpose? To keep the Magpies alive? Seems like a needless expense and further complication to me.
Perhaps with all the travel whinging they should leave the AFL.View attachment 1869418
Pretty much sums it up in one statement. National reserves isn’t practical, the state leagues need to get into line.
First I've ever heard of the WA sides being short of money.View attachment 1869418
Pretty much sums it up in one statement. National reserves isn’t practical, the state leagues need to get into line.
The club has done surveys on this.Back in my day, I knew a few that only followed the VFA and would refuse to watch the VFL. There’s probably more that stayed with the SANFL then follow the AFL.
So where do those PA supporters go for if they refuse the AFL and will not accept Port Power in the VFL?
We'd do exactly what both we and they do now.I mean
Do you hear Essendon fans going on about their 1891-94 VFA premierships? Do you hear Collingwood go on about their 1896 VFA premiership? Do you hear Carlton going on about their 1877 and 1887 VFA premierships? Do you hear Richmond go on about their 1902 or 1905 VFA Premierships?
You would actually be in the exact same boat as all the Victorian teams. Yet it'd only be you guys seeking approval for that history when the Victorian teams don't give a s**t.
They'd actually look down on you and laugh at you.
Nah its time for Port to leave the SANFL.Should be just an AFL reserves for all teams and the reserves fixture follows seniors fixtures and all games are curtain raisers to the Seniors AFL team at the grounds imo.
VFL, SANFL, WAFL and others with no AFL clubs.
Port Magpies the SANFL club with no affiliation to Power should still exist, but will probably struggle due to all the fans invested in AFL.
Same reason they did when we first joined the AFL and they made the Magpies move to Ethelton. A combination of fear and spite.And that no afl players can play in it as well. Not sure why there would have to be an issue as long as power still want to fund the sanfl club.
View attachment 1869418
Pretty much sums it up in one statement. National reserves isn’t practical, the state leagues need to get into line.
Which club ran the surveys, the one that sub-section of supporters doesn't choose to follow?The club has done surveys on this.
There are very very few of them.
They would also be very old now.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
What do you mean which club?Which club ran the surveys, the one that sub-section of supporters doesn't choose to follow?
So how many wooden spoons have Port won?We'd do exactly what both we and they do now.
Recognise them as part of our history and not count them in our AFL flag count.
It is usually only Crowies with a twist in their knickers about it.
On SM-G975F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Would it be equal?
Maybe evener but I doubt equal.
- SA teams would heve to travel more given the uneven number of east coast teams.
- Who would pay for the additional costs?
- If the AFL the East Coast clubs may not like it.
- If it was the clubs could Port afford it? (I only highlight them because they receive more AFL funding, ~$16M, than Adelaide, Fremantle and West Coast at ~11M).
- Would club list sizes have to increase? Current maximum of 44 players allows for no injuries.
- If not list size increase where would top up players come from and would the AFL or clubs pay?
I do agree flying both AFL and reserves squads but what about those who work and play part time? I'm assuming the reserves will mainly be AFL listed but will clubs have to have non AFL listed players and will they only be able to play home games I wonder if interstate teams.How is that?
I thought it would be rather easy to fly the two squads together with the reserves to play an early, late or even with both games running at the same time. The reserves side can either play as a curtain raiser to the main game or the matches played at the home teams training grounds. You could even televise it if you wanted to on a secondary channel or streaming service.
Yes and make demands about jumper and name..you join our comp again you do what you are told and wear what your are told.I'd like to see another state do something instead of relying on Victoria all the time.
Then we see supporters of these states that never do anything for themselves have a good ole whinge about how hard done by they are.
I see there is already a few in here that couldn't give a rats about what happens to some of the oldest footy clubs in the country.
What's the rookie wage now, 90k? Maybe AFL reserve non listed players receive this wage?I do agree flying both AFL and reserves squads but what about those who work and play part time? I'm assuming the reserves will mainly be AFL listed but will clubs have to have non AFL listed players and will they only be able to play home games I wonder if interstate teams.
Well, there is only 4 AFL clubs missing from this current VFL whom all travel up and down the eastern seaboard so all Port will be doing is forcing the AFL to bring in an AFL only reserve league.It’s a major change and cost, and it won’t happen without a strong majority of the clubs wanting it.
So far, we know one club is in favour (Port). The Freo president was asked and expressed reservation about the travel.
Let’s just say… it has a very, very long way to go.
If the clubs are that old they should have no problems surviving with plenty of support.I'd like to see another state do something instead of relying on Victoria all the time.
Then we see supporters of these states that never do anything for themselves have a good ole whinge about how hard done by they are.
I see there is already a few in here that couldn't give a rats about what happens to some of the oldest footy clubs in the country.
Yeah you're right it's the 21st century, just like the 19th century, nothing has changed, let's just follow what the Vics do.If the clubs are that old they should have no problems surviving with plenty of support.
It's the 21st century get with the times.
Fentanyl junkies can’t write satire that grinds the gears of Port Power fans who keep trying to convince us all that PA magpies are the same club.I always picture those fentanyl junkies in America when ever he posts.
Does it really matter at the reserves level? Werribee and Richmond are both known as the Tigers in the VFL and both wear yellow and black. No one seems to care about that. Sandingham and Hawthorn wear almost identical jumpers in the VFL and Coburg's jumper is very similar to Essendon's. Collingwood seem to be the only ones that care about this.So how many wooden spoons have Port won?
What jumper do they wear in the VFL?
What theme song do they use?
Specifically Eddie Maguire actually!!!Does it really matter at the reserves level? Werribee and Richmond are both known as the Tigers in the VFL and both wear yellow and black. No one seems to care about that. Sandingham and Hawthorn wear almost identical jumpers in the VFL and Coburg's jumper is very similar to Essendon's. Collingwood seem to be the only ones that care about this.
Seems like a pretty obvious decision to just let the Port Magpies brand and jumper enter the VFL/AFL reserves competition.