Potential serial killer

[Fullarton Power]

How about trying to answer the question. You are so quick to demand death upon an 11 yo but you deem the anti social behaviour of yourself to be acceptable.

Because I don't have to justify myself to the likes of you. You're not in the pig force now, chuckey boots.

 

[skipper kelly]

Because I don't have to justify myself to the likes of you. You're not in the pig force now, chuckey boots.

Try answering the question and staying on topic.

 

[mantis]

OK boys let it go, we are talking about an 11 year old commiting an horrific crime, I don'r advocate killing him, but believe he should be locked away & get treatment.

 

[Fullarton Power]

Try answering the question and staying on topic.

Just keep your f*cking nose out where it isn't necessary to stick it in and be derisive. There was an interesting debate going on here before you come along interjecting your personally motivated diatribes. Just f*ck off.

 

[skipper kelly]

OK boys let it go, we are talking about an 11 year old commiting an horrific crime, I don'r advocate killing him, but believe he should be locked away & get treatment.

I would just like to know if that fruitcake extends his beliefs to himself.

anyone with violent tendencies needs to be stamped on at the first instance.

this coming from a lunatic who threatens people on an internet forum with the use of an AK47 from its backyard.

 

[skipper kelly]

Just keep your f*cking nose out where it isn't necessary to stick it in and be derisive. There was an interesting debate going on here before you come along interjecting your personally motivated diatribes. Just f*ck off.

answer the question.

 

[Fullarton Power]

I would just like to know if that fruitcake extends his beliefs to himself.



this coming from a lunatic who threatens people on an internet forum with the use of an AK47 from its backyard.

Ever the comedian, this bloke.

 

[P_D]

From a psychological perspective

If the 5 year old child is of the mental capacity to pre-meditate such a plan of attack on such a young animal (which, standing back from the incident, I would deem as a MAJOR case of jealousy inflicted on anything that detracts attention from the child), then it would stand to reason that the child is aware that such behaviour is wrong.

The child will not have the maturity/capacity to foresee consequence, but is of the age where guilt has started to develop, that's for sure.

I think far too many people underestimate the capability of young children.

Do I recommend the child be institutionalised? Of course not. However for someone to rite off this behaviour as inconsequential due to age is very, very dangerous.

 

[skipper kelly]

Ever the comedian, this bloke.

any chance of answering the question?

 

[gadj1976]

I used to go out with a girl who's mum worked for the RSPCA.

Some of the photos that I saw of cruelty to animals made me feel queezy. And I'm not easily disturbed.

It's pretty low to do something like that to an animal. An animal and a small child/toddler are about equal when it comes to vulnerability and people who violate them should be dealt with equally.

 

[Fullarton Power]

any chance of answering the question?

I'm deliberately ignoring you , in the hope that a/ you'll go away or b / the moderators will finally wake up to who is the stirrer round here and remove the nuisance. Won't hold my breath waiting for option b though.

 

[lioness]

An animal and a small child/toddler are about equal when it comes to vulnerability and people who violate them should be dealt with equally.

I would agree with that. They're both equally as dependent on you to provide for them, and there is a massive level of trust from both that you will do the right thing by them. And in both cases I truly believe that there is NO excuse for violating that trust. At all.

 

[otaku]

It isn't just because I didn't like what he did, I want him locked up because he is a psychopath, an 11 year old knows the consequences of cruel actions, he knows that if you set fire to a living thing, it will cause it extreme pain & probably death.

Actually, inflicting pain on an animal isn't one of the signs of psychopathy.

Several times you have mentioned he is a psychopath, but you actually have nothing to base this on.

We also dont know if he has any of the other aspects of the usual triad of a serial killer.

Does he suffer from Enuresis? Is he a compulsive fire starter?

If so, then there is a potential for him to be a serial killer, but not a certainty

 

[skipper kelly]

I'm deliberately ignoring you , in the hope that a/ you'll go away or b / the moderators will finally wake up to who is the stirrer round here and remove the nuisance. Won't hold my breath waiting for option b though.

Lets see if I can get this straight.

You call for the death of an 11 yo and the stamping out of all people that show violent tendencies.

My question to you is, does this belief extend to people who threaten to use AK 47's from their backyard?

Any chance of answering this question?

 

[Fullarton Power]

Lets see if I can get this straight.

You call for the death of an 11 yo and the stamping out of all people that show violent tendencies.

My question to you is, does this belief extend to people who threaten to use AK 47's from their backyard?

Any chance of answering this question?

I reiterate:

I'm deliberately ignoring you , in the hope that a/ you'll go away or b / the moderators will finally wake up to who is the stirrer round here and remove the nuisance. Won't hold my breath waiting for option b though.

 

[skipper kelly]

I reiterate:

I'm deliberately ignoring you , in the hope that a/ you'll go away or b / the moderators will finally wake up to who is the stirrer round here and remove the nuisance. Won't hold my breath waiting for option b though.

a bit of a tough question to answer. Thought so.

Please try and keep the thread on track rather than your usual grandstanding.

here is the question again

You call for the death of an 11 yo and the stamping out of all people that show violent tendencies.

My question to you is, does this belief extend to people who threaten to use AK 47's from their backyard?

 

[Fullarton Power]

a bit of a tough question to answer. Thought so.

Please try and keep the thread on track rather than your usual grandstanding.

here is the question again

You call for the death of an 11 yo and the stamping out of all people that show violent tendencies.

My question to you is, does this belief extend to people who threaten to use AK 47's from their backyard?

Okay, seeing as there seems to be no other way, meet ignore. Click. Goodbye and good riddance.

 

[skipper kelly]

Okay, seeing as there seems to be no other way, meet ignore. Click. Goodbye and good riddance.

a bit tough to answer the question so run away like a little pussy.

 

[afc9798]

hehehe... mines doing the same thing... and knowing my luck he's drooling all over my clean sheets

And what about your dog?

 

[afc9798]

ah dear

it's a pity your comments are not in jest, and you are actualy stupid enough to think that murder is something of value to society

And what value does your racism add?

 

[- PC -]

a bit tough to answer the question so run away like a little pussy.

FP it was a valid question and looking at it from the side it seems to me that SK has a valid point.

First you say kill them ALL , then some, then only those with violent tendencies. As I have posted before where do you draw the line? Obviously mantis has drawn a line at a 5 year old and an 11 year old..What if the girl was 6? Or 8? When does she become responsible for her actions?

For someone to say ''I will kill you from my backyard with an ak47'' indicates to me the person has been playing ''full metal jacket'' a bit too long and has crossed that fantasy line between a game and life.

So FP please answer SKs question....should someone who shows violent tendencies on an internet forum be treated the same as the 11 year old? ie killed before they cross that line between internet and life?

 

[otaku]

I'd happily condone your murder. It would hardly be a loss to society, and someone as deranged as yourself being killed would be a benefit for the rest of us.

wishing death on another poster?? You and mantis should start a club.

The irony is fantastic.

 

[Fullarton Power]

FP it was a valid question and looking at it from the side it seems to me that SK has a valid point.

First you say kill them ALL , then some, then only those with violent tendencies. As I have posted before where do you draw the line? Obviously mantis has drawn a line at a 5 year old and an 11 year old..What if the girl was 6? Or 8? When does she become responsible for her actions?

For someone to say ''I will kill you from my backyard with an ak47'' indicates to me the person has been playing ''full metal jacket'' a bit too long and has crossed that fantasy line between a game and life.

So FP please answer SKs question....should someone who shows violent tendencies on an internet forum be treated the same as the 11 year old? ie killed before they cross that line between internet and life?

Firstly, SK is now on my ignore list as no one else seems to want to deal with the incessant nuisance he creates, so whatever drivel he posts from here will be invisible to me. He does not have a valid point at all, as usual he has warped the facts to suit his personal vendetta.
Secondly, No one said anything about killing anyone with paramilitary weapons, an abstract reference was made to such a weapon in jest and the recipient poster saw the humour in it. Game set and match. Build a bridge, get over it and move on.
Finally, I stated that regabilitatin for anyone with violent tendencies is a waste of time and resources. It deeply disturbs me that some children of these ages are capable of such horrific acts upon animals but what disturbs me more is the level of ' kid glove ' attitude towards the perpetrators of such acts. What sort of message are we sending to kids? Where do I draw the line? Simple. Anyone who is guilty of a violent act, be it against animal or human - one strike, you're out.

 

[skipper kelly]

Firstly, SK is now on my ignore list as no one else seems to want to deal with the incessant nuisance he creates, so whatever drivel he posts from here will be invisible to me. He does not have a valid point at all, as usual he has warped the facts to suit his personal vendetta.
Secondly, No one said anything about killing anyone with paramilitary weapons, an abstract reference was made to such a weapon in jest and the recipient poster saw the humour in it. Game set and match. Build a bridge, get over it and move on.

you made a reference to using an AK47 from your backyard against another poster. Whether or not he accepted your warped version is irrelevant. You made the threat. You also stated that people with violent tendencies should be stamped out. Does this include yourself?

 

[- PC -]

Firstly, SK is now on my ignore list as no one else seems to want to deal with the incessant nuisance he creates, so whatever drivel he posts from here will be invisible to me. He does not have a valid point at all, as usual he has warped the facts to suit his personal vendetta.
Secondly, No one said anything about killing anyone with paramilitary weapons, an abstract reference was made to such a weapon in jest and the recipient poster saw the humour in it. Game set and match. Build a bridge, get over it and move on.
Finally, I stated that regabilitatin for anyone with violent tendencies is a waste of time and resources. It deeply disturbs me that some children of these ages are capable of such horrific acts upon animals but what disturbs me more is the level of ' kid glove ' attitude towards the perpetrators of such acts. What sort of message are we sending to kids? Where do I draw the line? Simple. Anyone who is guilty of a violent act, be it against animal or human - one strike, you're out.

Firstly,I am an idiot he can see yours you cant see his( im tired)

Secondly , your obviously not a parent(and why I dont understand the call by mantis) I have seen my son ''love'' a cat a bit too much , and a gentle reminder that hugging big fat daddy is different than hugging a little kitten.

Now should I get my gun out and shoot my son? I mean by your standard he has violent tendencies and should be ''struck out''. At what level does violence towards an animal or human being become ''psycopathic'' ? A slap? A punch? A knife attack? If you have standards please find a level you can accept then let me know