Originally posted by RooMatera
This year, Adelaide during a final had an average age of 27!!
Yes "27"!!
This year was adelaides now or never year.
Bickley gone, smart gone, Hart will battle with age, as will Carey and Burns. Age putting holes in most areas of the ground for adelaide.
Fremantle are not losing anyone due to age, only gaining experience, and a bit more bulk into their young limbs. So I'd like to hear your theory on why they will finish bottom four.
Eeeep!!! I've thrown myself at the defence of fremantle 3 posts in a row!
*Goes and has a long shower, scrubs self clean*
Actually, if you cared to check the facts, Adelaide will lose only 1 player to retirement. Bickley.
Injuries had more of an impact on Adelaide this year than last. If Adelaide avoid that higher rate of injury, and have a year more like 2002 in regard to injuries, then a top 4 finish is well within reach.
Not that Freo will do bad, it is just that "Adelaide to slide" predictions are so very, very ho hum. "Adelaide to slide down the ladder & miss the 8" has been a consistent call for 2 or 3 years now, yet Adelaide keep making the 8 and making fools of their critics.
You'd think people would learn.




