A very precise and well summed up post.Unfortunately when it comes to key forwards we have little in the way of quality. When the selectors are in a position where they have to pick the least worst option they tend to get criticised no matter who they pick. I'm not suprised by the selection of Martin. Even though Martin is fairly unco in AFL terms, he plays like a big man and shows urgency. And Lisle (who probably won't get a 2nd contract) is out of favour because he lacks these qualities. Martin also gives the team more flexibility, allowing Leuenberger to spend more time forward.
On surface value it would seem Karnezis is deserving of a spot in the 22. I don't neccessarily buy into any of the conclusions that are being drawn, but I can't help wondering what the coaches' thought process is. Would love to hear an honest explanation, but that probably won't eventuate (at least while we're in season), so all we can do is speculate.
In regards to the whole Patty K scenario, I guess all we can do is have faith in the judgement of the coaching staff. The lack of immediate disclosure/transparency regarding the issue of his selection, but also others at times (IMO Callum Bartlett for example) in accordance with 'reported' solid ressies form sometimes leaves me wondering wether they are getting the short end of the stick more often than not? The whole process I find is sometimes frustrating. However; I ask myself "Am I in a position to be demanding answers and/or am I just be reading into this too much?"
Confused is one of many things that come to mind...