That this talentless hack can forge a successful career in doubles is an indictment on the standard of player in that form of the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
docker_azza said:Many of the top doubles players dont concentrate near as much on their singles or nothing on sinlges at all, and many top singles players dont concentreate nearly as much on doubles or nothing on doubles at all
Your comments are a truer reflection of ignorance rather than any blight on the game itself.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
scottywiper said:That this talentless hack can forge a successful career in doubles is an indictment on the standard of player in that form of the game.
whythelongface said:She is obviously smart enough to realise that she can earn an extremely good living by playing doubles. Good luck to her I say. You are obviously envious that some who you consider a hack is able to do so.
ever heard of Martina Hingis, or Lyndsay Davenport, in fact the majority of the top ten women play doubles regulary. January tennis fanscottywiper said:You blokes are fair dinkum kidding yourselves if you think she is a decent player.
None of the best singles players bother with doubles anymore, and it allows players like her to forge a career that would otherwise be beyond them.
AS for calling me a "January tennis fan" I have had a lot more to do with the sport than either of you I would guess.
It's my opinion and I'm sticking to it.![]()
Coughlan said:ever heard of Martina Hingis, or Lyndsay Davenport, in fact the majority of the top ten women play doubles regulary. January tennis fan
scottywiper said:I never said she wasn't smart, good luck to her for seeing a window of opportunity. What I said was that her success is an indictment on the standard of player playing doubles. I stand by that.
eastaugh36 said:Stubbs is a quality doubles player. At one time was one of the best in the world. Why bag her? She is one of the top doubles players just as Sharapova is one of the best singles players.
scottywiper said:I just believe that the reason she concentrated on doubles was mainly because she wasn't good enough to make it in singles. I think this is supported by her stats. In 14 grand slam appearances she won just four matches, four times making the second round and never advancing further.
She tried singles and couldn't cut it.
Furthermore, a quick look at the doubles rankings shows that only three of the top 10 women in singles are in the top 50 in doubles and none are are in the top 10, mainly because the best players don't like to play both too often, for obvious reasons.
Hence, Stubbs can be successful in doubles.
UNIT said:Actually a lot of the top ten used to play doubles (including Martina) not so long ago.
eastaugh36 said:Especially mens doubles. It is a really entertaining game often moreso than singles and I take great interest in it.