POTY Round 20 vs Collingwood

[grimlock]

5 Kennedy
4 O'Keefe
3 Mumford
2 LRT
1 Jack

YPOTY Johnson

 

[bungee]

5. LRT
4. Kennedy
3. Richards
2. Shaw
1. McVeigh

 

[MF]

5. Kennedy
4. Richards
3. LRT
2. ROK
1. McVeigh

YPOTY - Johnson

 

[CAS79]

5: Kennedy
4: Jack
3: O'Keefe
2: LRT
1: Mumford

YPOTY: AJ

 

[SM]

No love for Parker?

5. Kennedy
4. Shaw
3. Parker
2. Richards
1. McVeigh

YPOTY: Parker

 

[Jack2Jack]

5. Kennedy
4. Jack
3. O'Keefe
2. Richards
1. LRT

YP - Johnson

 

[bedford]

5 Kennedy
4 Bird
3 Jack
2 Shaw
1 Richards

 

[lihei]

5. LRT
4. Kennedy
3. Richards
2. Shaw
1. McVeigh

LRT BOG

 

[S120]

5. Josh Kennedy
4. Lewis Roberts-Thomson
3. Ryan O'Keefe
2. Kieren Jack
1. Craig Bird

YPOTY: Luke Parker

 

[Mick Oxlong]

5. Kennedy
4. O'Keefe
3. Shaw
2. Mumford
1. McVeigh

YPOTY: Johnson

 

[Mick Oxlong]

No love for Parker?

5. Kennedy
4. Shaw
3. Parker
2. Richards
1. McVeigh

YPOTY: Johnson

Why did you give YPOTY to Johnson over Parker?

 

[CAS79]

No love for Parker?

5. Kennedy
4. Shaw
3. Parker
2. Richards
1. McVeigh

YPOTY: Johnson

Why did you give YPOTY to Johnson over Parker?

Good question Stat, or is it an oversight?

 

[SM]

Is Parker eligible? Wasn't sure.

 

[CAS79]

Is Parker eligible? Wasn't sure.

He's younger than AJ.

 

[Dangas]

5. JPK clearly our best
4. Kizza - solid
3. Not Heath Shaw - tried to create run from HB (he and Eski going head to head with the best beard?)
2. Hyphen - considering our structure failure forward, tried his best to create a contest
1. Mummyford - Competitive.

YPOTY: Johnson - was poor initially, but was ok back.

 

[Gongswan]

5.JPK
4.Richards
3. ROK
2.Jack
1.LRT

YPOTY. Parker

 

[Maddhew]

5. Kennedy - By the length of the flemington straight
4. Jack - Effort was first class but costly miss on goal
3. Richards - Again proved why he is the best defender in the comp, unfortunately for him the ball was coming back in too quickly.
4. LRT - Goodes could watch his game and learn a thing or two about effort & footy smarts
1. Shaw - must have been frustrating running out of defence and having zero targets.

YPOTY - dont see the point anymore with 2 eligible.

 

[CAS79]

5. Kennedy - By the length of the flemington straight
4. Jack - Effort was first class but costly miss on goal
3. Richards - Again proved why he is the best defender in the comp, unfortunately for him the ball was coming back in too quickly.
4. LRT - Goodes could watch his game and learn a thing or two about effort & footy smarts
1. Shaw - must have been frustrating running out of defence and having zero targets.

YPOTY - dont see the point anymore with 2 eligible.

LOL it's been worse, but one of the reasons that I wanted to keep it age based and not games dependent.

5. JPK clearly our best
4. Kizza - solid
3. Not Heath Shaw - tried to create run from HB (he and Eski going head to head with the best beard?)
2. Hyphen - considering our structure failure forward, tried his best to create a contest
1. Mummyford - Competitive.

YPOTY: Johnson - was poor initially, but was ok back.

DANZ can can confirm you mean Roberts-Thomson and Dennis-Lane...

 

[Maddhew]

LOL it's been worse, but one of the reasons that I wanted to keep it age based and not games dependent.



DANZ can can confirm you mean Roberts-Thomson and Dennis-Lane...

The ground announcer last night announced that LRT had been subbed out for Armstrong, and then corrected to TDL.

Confusing with more than one two-dads in your team.

 

[Chinners100]

5. LRT
4. Kennedy
3. McVeigh
2. Bird
1. Richards

ypoty: Parker

 

[Dangas]

DANZ can can confirm you mean Roberts-Thomson and Dennis-Lane...

Yes very true, Hyphen1 and 2

 

[Skystyler]

5 JPK
4 Ted
3 ROK
2 LRT
1 KJ

 

[Trojan90]

5. Kennedy
4. LRT
3. Richards
2. McVeigh
1. Bird

 

[kangle4]

5. Kennedy
4. ROK
3. Jack
2. Shaw
1. LRT

YPOTY - Parker

 

[Ed_Gein]

5. Kennedy
4. Richards
3. O'Keefe
2. Jack
1. LRT

YPOTY: Johnson