Hammers_Saints
All Australian
Can't loophole Naismith he plays for Sydney
-
-
If you are seeing this notice, posts and uploads you make now may be lost when we cut over to the upgraded system. This should only last a few hours.
Post feedback, issues, errors and omissions here. Read the OP first, please.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Round 5 discussion thread
- Thread starter Butler
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Yeah just realised this myself...looks like Osborn was the correct choice
Probably just go Stanton as C then
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
- Apr 29, 2012
- 28,417
- 43,799
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Ahh shiiit damn Naismith, i can't do a loophole then, fuuark
lmach
Naitanui2Yeo
I'm doing the loophole due to still having Kommer. But seriously, who cares if you can't, just stick the C on Swan and watch him score another 170.
- Apr 29, 2012
- 28,417
- 43,799
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Won't Kommer be locked out due to Coll v Ess??
Small part of me is conntemplating going ablett to swan
On a level of 1-10 how stupid a trade would it be given I already have mayes so can use the other trade for Evans.
On a level of 1-10 how stupid a trade would it be given I already have mayes so can use the other trade for Evans.
CACA_TAZZA
Senior List
so in order to use the loophole, I'd VC Swan and C Ablett, and if Swan doesnt get at least 130+, then on Thurs night I can replace Burger with McBean (yes, I dunno who he is or why he is in my team either), then put the C on McBean?
lmach
Naitanui2Yeo
- Apr 18, 2012
- 2,960
- 1,465
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
So I'm all good doing - Swan VC, Patton (injured) C? Don't want to muck up my first loophole.
Not that stupid if he continues this form
Swan's last 3 scores vs Essendon: 187, 171, 172
What's the maximum score that would see people take the C off Swan?
That's always an interesting topic, what score should you take for your VC. I'm a little more conservative, so 115 is my cut-off.
mike_
All Australian
- Feb 28, 2007
- 661
- 235
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- New York Rangers, New York Knicks
Do you have to trade someone in for the loophole to work?
If I make Swan vice, substitue Roughead in the ruck for Currie who won't get a game and make Currie Captain, making Roughead emergency I'd still get the captain points from Swan right?
Right?
Yeah definitely. It ranges from 120-130 for me but Ablett against GWS is just too enticing.
Hmm.. I started the year without Franklin with the intention to bring him in by now, would go mental if I miss a monster score by him.
But the only way I can grab him is to trade out Hanley to a rookie or trade out Bartel for him, what do you all think? Reckon Buddy is a must have vs Roos? I still cant really see a good matchup for him and even when he hasnt really been firing, Buddy still pumps out solid tons.
But the only way I can grab him is to trade out Hanley to a rookie or trade out Bartel for him, what do you all think? Reckon Buddy is a must have vs Roos? I still cant really see a good matchup for him and even when he hasnt really been firing, Buddy still pumps out solid tons.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Tomorrow.
Also Hanley out is a blessing in disguise...has allowed me to do loophole now, otherwise i couldn't as all my non playing rookies are in the first partial lockout (Frost, Kommer, Naismith).
Still sticking with Swan VC, Franklin C.
You are correct, sir.
Ah m8. Thanks! I didn't even think about that. My only non-playing rookie is Frost so it looks like the C is on Swan!
Dannnnnnnnnn
Moderator
- Aug 24, 2012
- 37,843
- 55,637
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- T'Wolves/Patrick Beverley/Footscray
- Moderator
- #48
Expect a lower score from Libba this week guys. No Griffen so Libba will get extra attention.
mike_
All Australian
- Feb 28, 2007
- 661
- 235
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- New York Rangers, New York Knicks
Did I dun goof in trading Viney -> Burgoyne to Defence (Vlastuin emergency in midfield) and Neade -> Mayes
Kind of wanted to bring in Cloke or Stevie J but kind of decided to keep Bartel as he's a champion.
What do you guys think?
Kind of wanted to bring in Cloke or Stevie J but kind of decided to keep Bartel as he's a champion.
What do you guys think?
Similar threads
