Round 5 discussion thread

[swans4eva]

Take Swanny's 120 or risk it with Gablett against GWS?

 

[TedDougChris]

Swan as VC. So how does this loophole work?

You VC someone today, having the C on a non-playing option (Crouch). If the VC scores well, you leave the C on the field, with a nominated emergency on the bench to take the place of the non-playing option.

As the C scores zero, the VC then gets double points.

If the VC doesn't do well, you swap the C onto another player, thus doubling your chances of getting a good score.

 

[TedDougChris]

Taking Swan's 117.

 

[mrpig]

I got crouch captain

will leave him captain with a 120 from my VC swan.

So i will get my VC score, and my emergency will replace crouch
That's how it works dylan W

dwyer only 9 points in the last half :0

 

[Scotland]

I think I'll stick with Ablett as C. My opponent has him too so it won't cost me the win if he jags 160 or something.

 

[W.C. Fry]

Lift your game Macaffer!! Only one out of the 5 I played today who didn't raise his bat.

 

[DylanW]

You VC someone today, having the C on a non-playing option (Crouch). If the VC scores well, you leave the C on the field, with a nominated emergency on the bench to take the place of the non-playing option.

As the C scores zero, the VC then gets double points.

If the VC doesn't do well, you swap the C onto another player, thus doubling your chances of getting a good score.

Cheers, makes sense. Will have to try it sometime

 

[JuddyBuddy]

Might leave the C on Gaj, I think.

 

[Matching Mole]

I think it might be a C for Ablett too.

 

[mrpig]

you guys are playing with fire leaving the c on GAJ

his last two games against GWS, he just scraped through to 100

bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush

 

[JuddyBuddy]

He's due then haha

 

[W.C. Fry]

you guys are playing with fire leaving the c on GAJ

his last two games against GWS, he just scraped through to 100

bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush

Exactly. If he smashes out a 140 your only losing 20 points. If he smashes anything else and is subbed out you could lose 100. Captain Currie for me.

 

[SloppyJoe]

I will be going Ablett with C I think. My mate who I am facing in one of my leagues had Heppell and Shaw who both fired, he has Swan C.

Edit: Actually, he has Hannebery, ROK and Big Mac right now so if they also do well I'll have to take the risk on GAJ, if they don't then prob Swan

 

[Plugger35]

Swan why u no play 4 quarters?

Dwyer why did I start you?

 

[lmach]

491/4 + C

Swan (C), Heppell and Goddard all good. Dwyer's second half was very dissapointing, only eight points from it...

 

[mrpig]

He's due then haha

HAHAHa

if you put C on GAJ, power to you!

i'm not risking it, i can see far more downside than upside
Not taking risks i don't need to take

 

[MercilessMing]

People going to role the dice with ablett....
good luck. I wouldn't crack in the arm and everything.

 

[Jessbek]

505/4+C

Dwyer

 

[CaptScott]

Good for me so far (Swan (C), Pendles, Godd, Hepp), also had Macaff and Dwyer but was only expecting 60 from each of them so not too upset.

Taking Swans 120ish, but I'm a conservative player.

 

[VSTone]

So who is taking Swan's 120? I think i'll leave the C on Ablett.

120 swannie x2 thanks

 

[Big_Tazz]

sidey VC, will take that score... also had Hepps, Goddard and Pendles...

 

[CACA_TAZZA]

sidey VC, will take that score... also had Hepps, Goddard and Pendles...

nice one to have Sidey in your team, and even better to have him as C!

I think I'll take the risk and leave the C on Ablett, think he will outscore Swanny

 

[Fitzey]

Will ROK bounce back??? Thoughts?

 

[CaptScott]

Will ROK bounce back??? Thoughts?

Just realised I've got Rock vs Melbourne as well. I was going to take Swan but seeing as I have a lot of points to make up I will have to seriously consider this.

 

[Fitzey]

Just realised I've got Rock vs Melbourne as well. I was going to take Swan but seeing as I have a lot of points to make up I will have to seriously consider this.

Not him, Ryan O'Keefe!! Haha