Remove this Banner Ad

Ryder cleared!

  • Thread starter Thread starter RM_3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

RM_3

Team Captain
Joined
Mar 28, 2009
Posts
327
Reaction score
69
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Arsenal/Barcalona FC - Bulls/Denver
I've never felt so happy about something that was such a given.

Jamar and the other bloke will be bitterly disappointed.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Thank god.. I couldn't imagine Lucas, Hooker or Bock taking the ruck duties. Three thumbs up.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I wonder how long it took.

5 seconds or 10 seconds

Combination of both imo.
Seriously, shouldn't have even had to dispute it in the first place, pathetic reporting.
 
Combination of both imo.
Seriously, shouldn't have even had to dispute it in the first place, pathetic reporting.
Yeah, absolutely.

Barry Hall punched some guy in the face, and he gets what? (6 or 8 weeks?)
So essentially Barry Halls punch was only 3-4 times worse than Ryders bump.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

But Michael Tovey, QC, said Ryder had kept his feet planted on the ground when shepherding Dangerfield and there was “nothing remarkable” about the force which was used.

Haha.
I think they're boldly implying that Patty Dangerfield is weak;)
 
They were discussing on AW that the AFL Advocate was arguing that as Ryder was a bigger bloke than Dangerfield he should have used less force!!!
I couldn't quite believe what I heard and neither could Healy and Russell on AW.

How ****ed up is the whole system!!??
 
yes thank f**k common sense actually prevailed here. hint to the MRP, be accountable and use this case as a precedent that a fair, tucked in, foot planted, within 5m, LEGITIMATE and perfectly executed hip n shoulder is actually fair play and part of the game.

rant over /
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom