Remove this Banner Ad

Updated Sarah Cafferkey - Hunter Gets Life Without Parole

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Ok mods I'll leave out that other theory started by the other posters but with all due sensitivity I still find it strange more people and the media, given it's poor record, aren't wondering what she, a 22yo was doing with him, a 47 year old guy, in th first place, and not letting us ask those questions only puts mor people in danger in the future.
 
Ok mods I'll leave out that other theory started by the other posters but I still find it strange more people and the media, given it's poor record, aren't wondering what she, a 22yo was doing with him, a 47 year old guy, in th first place.

Maybe out of respect for her mourning family?
 
It's pretty obvious what you're getting at. The shit thing about it is that it's under the guise that you actually give a shit about the well being of kids but really you just want to gossip about a girl that was murdered only 2 weeks ago.

Let it go.

Mods, feel free to delete my posts :)
 
Ok mods I'll leave out that other theory started by the other posters but with all due sensitivity I still find it strange more people and the media, given it's poor record, aren't wondering what she, a 22yo was doing with him, a 47 year old guy, in th first place, and not letting us ask those questions only puts mor people in danger in the future.

I think everyone has an idea, but it doesn't change anything.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The original sentence doesn't really seem that out of step with sentencing for similar crimes. Personally I can't see much of a problem with it based on what little I've read. Murder is very upsetting on a personal level but the reality is that recidivism rates are incredibly low. Claiming the judge stuffed up is just playing Monday morning quarterback. The details of the crime are disturbing to read but in reality it was a very ordinary, tawdry little murder with little to suggest that the perpetrator would reoffend a couple of decades down the line.

It would be interesting to read a bit more background about how the crimes he committed since release have been treated though.

Just wow!

You dont think 13 years for murder sends out the wrong message?

And I'm sure the victim's family see it as more than a "tawdry little murder".
 
Just wow!

You dont think 13 years for murder sends out the wrong message?

And I'm sure the victim's family see it as more than a "tawdry little murder".

Harsh punishment doesn't have a significant impact on crime rates. Specifically regarding murder, someone who is going to murder another is still going to do it regardless of whether the sentence is 13 years or 130 years of eating dog shit for breakfast lunch and tea.
 
Harsh punishment doesn't have a significant impact on crime rates. Specifically regarding murder, someone who is going to murder another is still going to do it regardless of whether the sentence is 13 years or 130 years of eating dog shit for breakfast lunch and tea.
You have an interesting perspective. And blinding lack of logic.
The hallmarks of a great BF poster.
 
Harsh punishment doesn't have a significant impact on crime rates. Specifically regarding murder, someone who is going to murder another is still going to do it regardless of whether the sentence is 13 years or 130 years of eating dog shit for breakfast lunch and tea.

Yeah fair enough mate. Let's just slap these murderers with good behaviour bonds and be done with it :rolleyes:
 
Might be time for a seperate pro- & anti-capital punishment thread
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It's pretty obvious what you're getting at. The shit thing about it is that it's under the guise that you actually give a shit about the well being of kids but really you just want to gossip about a girl that was murdered only 2 weeks ago.
It's a public forum ffs! People are talking about it because it's interesting, I don't know of any 22-year olds who hang around with 47-year old convicted crims on a social level.
 
Just wow!

You dont think 13 years for murder sends out the wrong message?

And I'm sure the victim's family see it as more than a "tawdry little murder".
That's the way democracy works, the needs of the majority are what count. The 'victim's family' are just an insignificant minority.
 
You have an interesting perspective. And blinding lack of logic.
The hallmarks of a great BF poster.

I recall that research suggests the prospect of imprisonment affects crime rates, but the length of the imprisonment is of negligible effect. It's all well and good to say "X wouldn't have had the chance to commit a particular crime if they had been imprisoned longer", but the same could be said for any person who re-offends. You can't lock every convicted criminal away forever in case they might reoffend.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom