Simpkins Scandal
- Thread starter Dave The Man
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2004
- Posts
- 1,829
- Reaction score
- 21
- Location
- Back of the Y
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- San Diego Chargers
- Banned
- #2
Can the Storm do anything about it or do they have to take it. Was Shane Webke? that good and popular enough, that they would rig his last match.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Dave The Man said:
No, but i'm not going to go on about a loss when nothing can be done to ever change the result. There were some questionable calls, but the Storm didn't make the most of their opportunities like the Broncos did and deserved to lose as a result.
So, for the last time, get over it ...
Stop whinging like a toddler Dave the Man. FFS stop starting threads about it everywhere. You are pissed off - we get it!!! There is nothing you can do about. As for calling Webcke a "****er" - you have no idea. Now grow up.
The Old Dark Navy's
Moderator
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2000
- Posts
- 98,129
- Reaction score
- 131,939
- Location
- Wherever I am
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Nottingham Forest
- Staff
- #7
You've had several threads deleted since last night, all short, inarticulate rubbish. Stop attention seeking. There are heaps of other threads to post in.
By the way, you have targetted Simpkins the whole time. Do you realise that Bill Harrigan was the video ref who refused the King try? Do you realise there is every chance the touch judges might have had an input into the Hodges touch on the ball that went over the sideline? The touch judge calls the ball out and points to who the ball came off last in these situations. Touch judges also give a call to the ref in stripping decisions on occasion.
Bit rough to blame Simpkins for the whole thing, but then I'd expect that from you given the quality of your contributions on the subject to date.
Take a leaf out of philhawk's book. Hurting and with every reason to work out some anger considering the doubt over some calls, instead decides to find perspective knowing he can't change it. I wouldn't be able to do it in his situation, I'd be bitter, but I wouldn't be carrying on like a two year old chucking a tantrum.
By the way, you have targetted Simpkins the whole time. Do you realise that Bill Harrigan was the video ref who refused the King try? Do you realise there is every chance the touch judges might have had an input into the Hodges touch on the ball that went over the sideline? The touch judge calls the ball out and points to who the ball came off last in these situations. Touch judges also give a call to the ref in stripping decisions on occasion.
Bit rough to blame Simpkins for the whole thing, but then I'd expect that from you given the quality of your contributions on the subject to date.
Take a leaf out of philhawk's book. Hurting and with every reason to work out some anger considering the doubt over some calls, instead decides to find perspective knowing he can't change it. I wouldn't be able to do it in his situation, I'd be bitter, but I wouldn't be carrying on like a two year old chucking a tantrum.
smasha
It's Time!
I've never been that bloody angry for a long time.
Refs should be hung.
Refs should be hung.
LOL keep dreaming mate.Dave The Man said: