St Kilda v Adelaide Matchday thread

[Stephen2]

At the end of the day - i was right, he wasn't delisted, traded or even considered to so run along and good luck graduating from high school

1) Truck Rutten never said he would definitely be delisted or traded.

2) You have no idea whether he was considered to be delisted or traded, so don't pretend you do.

3) Truck Rutten argued his position well, you've done nothing but hold a grudge for several months.

ROLLEYES!

 

[DirrtyBee]

i can laugh at this thread now.but what a shit game it was to be at...

 

[natty]

oh dear me

 

[Truck Rutten]

At the end of the day - i was right, he wasn't delisted, traded or even considered to so run along and good luck graduating from high school

This surely must be the most moronic bump of all time. You can't be right about anything when you don't actually express a defined opinion on the matter. Are you really that much of a cretin that you're trying to claim a win for something you didn't even say? All you did was take issue with my posts and tell us what a great, consistent player you think Reilly is, without providing any justification why.

Apart from the fact that you never stated that he wouldn't be put on the trade table, neither you or I know exactly what happened behind closed doors during trade week. With the perceived strength of this years draft, the diluted offering next year, and the impending arrival of the 2 new clubs, picks were being valued like gold this year. Couple this with Brent's lack of output over the last couple of seasons and his worth was at an all time low. Given that, the club is probably better off to stick with him and hope that he finally delivers on his promise next year.

The really astounding bit is that Reilly was dropped after that miserable game against the Saints, and even after a solid game with Sturt the following week was not selected for the final against Collingwood. Why weren't you bumping the thread then genius?

If your intention in bumping this thread was to make yourself look like a total numbskull, then congratulations; you've succeeded splendidly.

 

[Truck Rutten]

1) Truck Rutten never said he would definitely be delisted or traded.

2) You have no idea whether he was considered to be delisted or traded, so don't pretend you do.

3) Truck Rutten argued his position well, you've done nothing but hold a grudge for several months.

ROLLEYES!

Cheers

 

[Crowing Around]

1) Truck Rutten never said he would definitely be delisted or traded.

2) You have no idea whether he was considered to be delisted or traded, so don't pretend you do.

3) Truck Rutten argued his position well, you've done nothing but hold a grudge for several months.

ROLLEYES!

Who asked your opinion dumbass - good to see you've added something constructive to this argument!

And trust me, i have better things to do than "hold a grudge" on an internet forum!

 

[Crowing Around]

This surely must be the most moronic bump of all time. You can't be right about anything when you don't actually express a defined opinion on the matter. Are you really that much of a cretin that you're trying to claim a win for something you didn't even say? All you did was take issue with my posts and tell us what a great, consistent player you think Reilly is, without providing any justification why.

Apart from the fact that you never stated that he wouldn't be put on the trade table, neither you or I know exactly what happened behind closed doors during trade week. With the perceived strength of this years draft, the diluted offering next year, and the impending arrival of the 2 new clubs, picks were being valued like gold this year. Couple this with Brent's lack of output over the last couple of seasons and his worth was at an all time low. Given that, the club is probably better off to stick with him and hope that he finally delivers on his promise next year.

The really astounding bit is that Reilly was dropped after that miserable game against the Saints, and even after a solid game with Sturt the following week was not selected for the final against Collingwood. Why weren't you bumping the thread then genius?

If your intention in bumping this thread was to make yourself look like a total numbskull, then congratulations; you've succeeded splendidly.

Wow, you don't over exaggerate there at all, do you chief?!

At the end of the day, I gave you my position, you disagreed and that's fine - if we all agreed on players it'd be pretty bloody boring.
But if you need any more proof that the B&F is not the best assessment of a player's ability and output, see this year's Brownlow results vs all clubs B&F - particularly ours.
If you can honestly justify Simon Goodwin's finishing position, i'll concede this argument to you!

 

[Crow-mo]

Wow, you don't over exaggerate there at all, do you chief?!

At the end of the day, I gave you my position, you disagreed and that's fine - if we all agreed on players it'd be pretty bloody boring.
But if you need any more proof that the B&F is not the best assessment of a player's ability and output, see this year's Brownlow results vs all clubs B&F - particularly ours.
If you can honestly justify Simon Goodwin's finishing position, i'll concede this argument to you!

you could always just stop digging yourself deeper, each post does you less and less favours. its not against the law you know.