Remove this Banner Ad

Substitutes Bitch thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrmatt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I know Hodge said before he wouldn't start as a sub because he'd want to play straight away after the proper warm up, which makes you think he won't play altogether. He was also saying Bruce would be a great sub for them.
 
Game one sub rule fury!

Hardwick let Foley run himself into the ground then subbed him off

A premeditated plan for his sub

Wtf....this is going to screw 3 round averages big time. It is going to make trades very interesting indeed. For example we are all saying Ablett after round 9 BUT if Ablett runs half a game like Foley and gets a 50 then it may have to be sooner than later.

SC scoring has not allowed for this use of the sub AND as said before it could happen to any player who needs conditioning or coming back from injury. We cannot predict it but the scoring averages are thrown out.

Am I wrong?

and yes I spent countless hours deciding between Foley and Cotchin - you know which was I went ggggggrrrrrr maybe first trade is straight swap Foley to Cotchin lol
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I had Foley in my team right up until the last minute (eventually ended up replacing him with Montagna after some changes). He looked okay until he was subbed off. I would keep him in your teams.
 
My apologies...apparently Sub is good for taking in ill players who may get through half a game...I wonder how many other coaches will take this "see how he goes" approach to ill players eg gastro

On a brighter note, all SC ers should thank Hardwick for his transparency and honesty :)

Foley
 
I know Hodge said before he wouldn't start as a sub because he'd want to play straight away after the proper warm up, which makes you think he won't play altogether. He was also saying Bruce would be a great sub for them.

This has me second guessing my backline now. Had locked Bruce in but after hearing this am having second thoughts. I really hate this new rule.
 
So is Otten going to be the sub or what?

should I remove him from my team before the lockout?
 
But 180K is too much to have sitting on your bench.

Especially for an emergency that is being used as a sub.

Wouldn't you think?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I'm forced to start Otten as I forgot to have make Duigan an emergency and my other 2 def's are from GC.
 
But 180K is too much to have sitting on your bench.

Especially for an emergency that is being used as a sub.

Wouldn't you think?

Well im hoping he wont be the sub every week. Especially since all teams are new to the sub rules.

I might even risk Otten this week
 
I decided to trade out Otten for Buckley and bring Lower onto the ground.

This allowed me to upgrade Pendles to Swan.

Might bite me in the bum but I can't justify having 180K sitting on the pine.

We will see what happens.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

**** it!

Selwood was looking good too.

Oh well, there goes my round 1 out the window.
 
fmsc, never considerd selwood until 6.40pm when i realised i had enough cash for watson > selwood.... fml big time... hopefully it works out during the year but some bad luck to start the year
 
fmsc, never considerd selwood until 6.40pm when i realised i had enough cash for watson > selwood.... fml big time... hopefully it works out during the year but some bad luck to start the year

It was either Bartel or Selwood for me.
Went for Bartel. He started very slow and was spewing because as you said, selwood dominated 1st qrter.
Happy atm, will see as the season goes on though.

I squeezed some cash out of my bench players to upgrade Bartel to Selwood!!! When I got a hold of fanfooty in the 3rd quarter I almost slit my wrists.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom