Remove this Banner Ad

No Oppo Supporters Tanner Bruhn - charges formally dropped

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
And that's the difference - this is not a "not guilty" verdict, where we can quite rightly run some of the analysis that people are - very sensitively and sensibly - proposing.
Yes, this is also the case for the DeGoey allegations. Charges were dropped because the complainant/accuser withdrew them (DeGoey, I'm talking about here). He was never declared "innocent."

I'm glad to see Tanner has come through this. If what you say is true, that the complainant's friends testified she said it was consensual, but she was going to use it to get some money, then that does horrify me.

Tanner won't come through this untarnished, I'm afraid. The whole situation is dodgy AF. But at least he can get on with his life now and hopefully aim for a big 2026 playing footy.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

If what you say is true, that the complainant's friends testified she said it was consensual, but she was going to use it to get some money, then that does horrify me.
These witnesses are not known to the accused, but to the accuser...

From various news reports (public domain), my emphasis:

****

She gave evidence she was later told by Mr __ that Mr ___ had told him the alleged victim had lied to police.

Ms ____ said she was told the alleged victim had been propositioned by the two men for sex, agreed and consented, but had demanded more money after the act.

Mr __ said he had not “directly” been told by Mr _ the alleged victim lied to police but he had “started feeling a bit funny or off about the whole situation” following conversations with Mr ___.

****

The friend on Thursday gave evidence that the alleged victim had agreed to provide sexual services to the men in exchange for money.

The court was told after the incident, the woman requested more money but the men declined so she reported the incident as a rape.

"I certainly came to the conclusion that she lied to the police," the witness said.

Det Ronaldson on Friday told the court there had been conflicting information
between the woman's initial disclosure and her official police statement.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Moderator
  • #84
The accuser = the complainant (aka the one making the complaint).
I'm pretty sure Joe knows that which is why they were talking about the ones who gave evidence during the first two days of the committal hearing as being witnesses for the accuser/complainant
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hopefully Tanner can move on with his life now, unfortunately this stigma will stick with him. The lesson is players need to be more aware of what they do outside of the club. Looking around for girls in car parks at 4:00 am is not smart for someone with a public profile .
 
It's more than a lesson, it's a life ruining episode for all parties. Because she was allegedly paid, (evidence, provided to attest to that) doesn't mean she forgoes her right to call out sexual behaviour that wasn't agreed upon. Payment does grey the whole area on what was consensual, and only they know the answer. It's just unfortunate the Court system is so long and laborious.
Bruhn had told friends months ago he was innocent of rape, and was confident it would be dropped when the facts came to light, but devastated nontheless.

Loose lips sink ships, think about that before you go kicking people who have inside knowledge but haven't spilled their guts all over BF.
 
I agree completely and, of course, sex crime cases are terribly complex and this one has the extra factor of being sleazy in even the most positive light.

But five people associated with the alleged victim swearing on oath that she said it was consensual and wanted to extort money?

This case is one I'm willing to go that far on. The prosecution should never have proceeded.

And that's the difference - this is not a "not guilty" verdict, where we can quite rightly run some of the analysis that people are - very sensitively and sensibly - proposing.

If he'd been found not guilty, I'd agree. Doesn't mean he's innocent, who knows what happened ...

But this is an abandoned prosecution. It's dropped charges even though the alleged victim continues to claim a crime occurred. But with compelling evidence she is lying.

This happens for two reasons. First, it's the 1970s and we're living in the gender dark ages. Second, it's because the DPP has come to its senses and realised that the case is weak.

In that case, "innocent" is fine by me.
Where did you get this information about the five people from?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Just back from the main board. Need a wash.
The dark side of human nature, prejudice and the investment in an alternative reality, disappoints me.
A lot.
Credit to Mr Meow, it's genuinely so sad that people would rather the horrific scenario of a woman being r*ped so they have an opportunity to pointscore on a football club they hate, than have the situation we've got where Tanner is an innocent man.

I get tribalism. I really do. It's why this forum exists, but f*ck me, there's a line you just cannot cross if you want to be seen as a decent human being.

Some people just cannot take their scarves off, and it's Richmond fans more than anybody. It's abhorrent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top