TheClokes
Cancelled
For a job well done!
Keep up the good work.
Keep up the good work.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I was going to bag Gerard Sholly for all his f- up's over the years but heard this morning that he was instrumental in Martin Clarke's recruitment, so I partially forgive him.
Put it in perspective. Hine got quality with early picks in 2005. We don;t know the results of 2007. Some exciting CV's but who knows what will actually be produced. Reid looked promiosing and Dick has look a worthy project. 2004 was nothing to write home about. Rusling may have changed that but who knows now. Where we have done well is later and rookie selections. If Hine has played a major role there then he has done very well. I don't know who does what in that regard. Clarke I suspect is more down to his reputation and the clubs drive to unearth players from all avenues given our resources.
Not criticising Hine but I'm not goint over the top just yet. A bag full of senior players from the 2006 draft would make the world of difference.
Yeh we were very lucky to Marty Clarke!Brisbane passed on Martin Clarke, so he was lucky to land on our doorstep. We still had to work hard to get him, but bottom line is that we lucked out.
No I didn’t.You posted here with great authority before the season had even started that the pies recruiting was woeful and that malthouse couldn't coach.
I am very happy with the vast improvement from the low base. I have said all along though that having the early picks should make significant improvement to the results. As I said above what has been very noteworthy has been the results from the late and rookie selections. I have never been critical of Hine. I have been critical of MM and I am still not a fan. I am pleased that he seems to have less input on recruitment.even other club's supporters are remarking about how the pies recruiting has been outstanding.
dicknose - markt is a passionate fan who doesn't want to get his hopes up...doesnt want the side overestimating its ability and falling short of a premiership.
Doesnt mean his negative attitudes cant be pointed out sometimes. I have to admit when I read the title of another thread I had to read twice the name of the author, because I've never seen such a positive line written by MarkT in years!!!
Look dicknose you have picked out a post among many. It doesn’t quite do what you want it to but no doubt it was one of many that had some criticism from me. Fact is I said all along we’d be about where we were last year and that wasn’t good enough given where we came from a few years back. We arsed up list management terribly. Well here we are right where we were last year. It looks better and probably is better because some kids are coming through. How good they will be who knows but it is promising and exciting to watch and gives me cause for optimism. Look at what I said about Hine’s performance though and tell me what doesn’t ring true? It’s what I said at the start of the year.posted by MarkT on 23/4/07
Just what is the problem with that? I stand 100% by that. Hine has come into the team and appears to have made a difference although it’s hard to say how much is Hine’s doing."IMO if you aren’t angry at what has happened to our club after having so many early picks and being well placed after 2002 to compile a premiership list then you are just blindly loyal to the point that you are part of the problem. We blew our shot at it and to expect the same people who failed before to succeed this time is irresponsible.
15+ needs reassessment. Some of the kids have had some exposure and look like being at least handy and mostly better than that. Understand that there will be 5+ list changes annually even if we have a strong list though. I’ll make it 8 to 10. As for coaching, I still think MM has severe list management flaws and limited match day tricks. I think MM is on train tracks. I don’t think I have said he can’t coach at all. I have said he isn’t the one I think will coach us to a flag. I have also said his list management skills are poor because he is a poor judge. IMO that is a major job requirement.We have a fantastic large and loyal supporter base but we over value our own dramatically and excuse our mistakes habitually. It is one thing to get a few decisions wrong but we have got few right and are far too soft on our own failures. I am at the point now that I almost hope we have an ordinary year and we sack the coach while getting an early draft pick. That’s not what I want to happen but 3 years ago I would have gone ballistic at someone even suggesting. The problem is we have absolutely zero chance of wining a premiership without 15+ list changes on the back of a complete cleanout of the coaching regime and even then we would still be pushing it up hill.
We have made strides but frankly it is still true. Our list has holes and our coaching even last week was supplemented. Who doing the ruck coaching? Lets see how we fare in trade week this year.We just aren’t good enough on or off the park.
Been to an AGM?This is not a reaction to a loss. This is a reaction to continual failure and a lack of accountability. If I go to the AGM and we cop the same pathetic crap as previously I swear I will walk up the stage and throw up on it."
Think that if you like. I’m not chasing credibility from you or for that matter anyone else.you have no credibility.
how do you know he has less input on recruitment or had any in the years before on under 18 picks not ready made players.No I didn’t.I am very happy with the vast improvement from the low base. I have said all along though that having the early picks should make significant improvement to the results. As I said above what has been very noteworthy has been the results from the late and rookie selections. I have never been critical of Hine. I have been critical of MM and I am still not a fan. I am pleased that he seems to have less input on recruitment.
For a start I said seems and I base that among other things from various comments made publicly by Neil Balme between around 2000 when he spoke about MM's directive re the types of mids he wanted and last year when he spoke about the football department etc restructure. I’ll leave it at public information.how do you know he has less input on recruitment or had any in the years before on under 18 picks not ready made players.
You do realise that Noel Judkins is still one of our primary recruiters. Hine is the face, Noel is pretty much his equal.Bloody Noel Judkins was suppose to be the best recruiter in australia coming from the bombers, he was just a big big MISTAKE!!!!
Hard to admit it, but I agree.This is one of the most painful things for me to say and i am only just coming able to say this but here goes
I am glad that Brad Scott is at Collingwood and I don't want him to leave in the next 5 years at least.
That was hard work but it is in the open now. Whats do you guys think? He does a lot of work and study for the club
Stuff that - What you're saying is completely without perspective.Put it in perspective. Hine got quality with early picks in 2005.
I think the idea is that a Ferrari can be modified to drive through the mud, but a 4WD Ute will never go 200kph.I think the general methodology is that you can teach a kid certain footy tricks, but you can't teach them certain physical attributes. This is not the case for all of them, but there is a decidedly different theme generally.