Drugs Are Bad Mackay?
Moderator
- Joined
- May 24, 2006
- Posts
- 87,145
- Reaction score
- 182,063
- Location
- Car 55
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Redbacks, Sturt, Liverpool, Arizona
- Staff
- #1
How's he going?
All captains want to drive the culture within their club as Luke Hodge did at Hawthorn. Players willing to stay for less, want to be part of what the club is building, driven towards premiership success.
Seeing players walk out - Dangerfield, Cameron, Lever - is basically them telling Tex that I don't believe in what you are selling. By extension, I don't believe in you. There are other elements to them leaving of course - money, family etc but there is no doubt Tex would in part take these players leaving personally.
His vision of the club and the group he wants to lead is being chipped away at. It undermines him if he's preaching club, loyalty, the jumper, culture, the tight knit playing group, what we are building... and not everyone is buying in.
Will he be able to accept the reality that playing lists are increasingly fluid and some players will leave? I wonder if he's getting a bit jaded by the experience, wondering Do the players believe in me? and tending to bunker down with the ones he trusts and to a degree ostracise/alienate those he doesn't.
The story of Blight, Ablett and the bridge resonates. All leaders want to be the Blight - who ultimately convinced his player to get back on board, buy in and play great footy. It will take some character from Tex to continue to believe in himself if, in the same situation, some of his team mates have said seeya. Sloane leaving would break him IMO.
The other issue he faces is how to captain on match day as a forward. 'Consistent forward' is almost an oxymoron. However good a forward is, they are reliant to a degree on supply, fast ball movement, some space to work in - things that are often out of their control.
The forwards who are consistent usually do it by having a constant defensive presence. Their offensive output may go up and down like all forwards but they can still impact the game. The ball might not fall your way but you can always chase, harass, tackle, pressure, lock the ball in etc. This is not really Walker's game. If he's not taking marks and kicking goals he's usually not doing anything.
When David Neitz was captain at Melbourne there were times when he'd have to switch to CHB just to get into the play. Even captains Matthew Pavlich and Jonathon Brown would push themselves into the centre square when it just wasn't happening up forward and needed to impose themselves on the game.
Walker doesn't really have these other avenues to get himself involved in the match if it's not happening for him up forward.
There are times in a game when the captain just has to do something. When Tex has had quiet games he looks defeated, almost retreats into himself and gets down on himself. Seems worried about how his game will be viewed rather than having mechanisms to turn it around.
van Berlo was a good player initially and had some high possession games early but IMO once he was captain he didn't spend enough time on continuing to improve and develop his own game or sharpen his skills. Being captain and managing the group became a greater priority than his personal output as a footballer.
Tex needs some me time IMO - priority for the preseason on his game, his output, his skills. The best thing he can do as captain is kick and create goals on match day. Not speeches, not directing, not organising, not being the face of the club in the media, not hiding behind 'playing my role' and being part of the forward line group.
All captains want to drive the culture within their club as Luke Hodge did at Hawthorn. Players willing to stay for less, want to be part of what the club is building, driven towards premiership success.
Seeing players walk out - Dangerfield, Cameron, Lever - is basically them telling Tex that I don't believe in what you are selling. By extension, I don't believe in you. There are other elements to them leaving of course - money, family etc but there is no doubt Tex would in part take these players leaving personally.
His vision of the club and the group he wants to lead is being chipped away at. It undermines him if he's preaching club, loyalty, the jumper, culture, the tight knit playing group, what we are building... and not everyone is buying in.
Will he be able to accept the reality that playing lists are increasingly fluid and some players will leave? I wonder if he's getting a bit jaded by the experience, wondering Do the players believe in me? and tending to bunker down with the ones he trusts and to a degree ostracise/alienate those he doesn't.
The story of Blight, Ablett and the bridge resonates. All leaders want to be the Blight - who ultimately convinced his player to get back on board, buy in and play great footy. It will take some character from Tex to continue to believe in himself if, in the same situation, some of his team mates have said seeya. Sloane leaving would break him IMO.
The other issue he faces is how to captain on match day as a forward. 'Consistent forward' is almost an oxymoron. However good a forward is, they are reliant to a degree on supply, fast ball movement, some space to work in - things that are often out of their control.
The forwards who are consistent usually do it by having a constant defensive presence. Their offensive output may go up and down like all forwards but they can still impact the game. The ball might not fall your way but you can always chase, harass, tackle, pressure, lock the ball in etc. This is not really Walker's game. If he's not taking marks and kicking goals he's usually not doing anything.
When David Neitz was captain at Melbourne there were times when he'd have to switch to CHB just to get into the play. Even captains Matthew Pavlich and Jonathon Brown would push themselves into the centre square when it just wasn't happening up forward and needed to impose themselves on the game.
Walker doesn't really have these other avenues to get himself involved in the match if it's not happening for him up forward.
There are times in a game when the captain just has to do something. When Tex has had quiet games he looks defeated, almost retreats into himself and gets down on himself. Seems worried about how his game will be viewed rather than having mechanisms to turn it around.
van Berlo was a good player initially and had some high possession games early but IMO once he was captain he didn't spend enough time on continuing to improve and develop his own game or sharpen his skills. Being captain and managing the group became a greater priority than his personal output as a footballer.
Tex needs some me time IMO - priority for the preseason on his game, his output, his skills. The best thing he can do as captain is kick and create goals on match day. Not speeches, not directing, not organising, not being the face of the club in the media, not hiding behind 'playing my role' and being part of the forward line group.






