Game The Boredom Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

ssfc0203

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
10,648
Likes
18
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
IC, SAC (Titans), EC, Daredevils
Thread starter #1,607
Ah yes, but being hypocritical and narrow minded is pretty much all that religion is.
I disagree, mostly.

Except for extremism, I accept religion wholeheartedly. Its just people believing something they choose to believe in, what, in their minds, is substantial evidence of their god existing. We can't choose what they believe in, and we're doing it every day too. Our theories of life and the universe and everything are just that, theories. Nothing can ever be proven 100%, it is just what can be proven greater than the other.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

ssfc0203

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Posts
10,648
Likes
18
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
IC, SAC (Titans), EC, Daredevils
Thread starter #1,616
Guess I'll take my anti-religion thoughts somewhere else :(
Not at all. Your opinion is your own, like anything there is no measure of correctness that it can be graded upon.

I was just pointing out that your views on religion may be more narrow minded than you may think, and really, it is a belief. Until the theory of gravity was developed, nearly everyone used to believe the earth was flat as there was enough evidence to compile that fact.

So many people take the moral high ground over religion, and it shits me. Religion is nothing but evidence, as little as it may be. No point in arguing the validity of the evidence, because you're never going to convince anyone either way. Same goes with the theory of gravity. Prove its narrow minded and hypocritical? Can't.

(I'm not religious, btw)

Not attacking you either! I'm just a society and culture freak, excuse my rants :p
 

NeRFaHoLIc

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Posts
6,148
Likes
188
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Liverpool, Boston Celtics
And?

Neitzsche had his own opinions.

How are they more valid than someone who advocates religion? Just because he is quoted often?
I fail to see where I made that statement?

Therefore I don't see how you arrived at that conclusion.

Plus, it doesn't even mean God is physically dead. :eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom