Remove this Banner Ad

Mega Thread The Flat Earth Mega thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter katana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

What shape is the Earth?

  • Globe

  • Flat circle

  • Unsure


Results are only viewable after voting.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

"n the big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes."

~ hitler

Actually, it doesn't, unless you have never gone outside of a capital city or travelled, I'm not even sure how you could seriously write that.

But hey, go and grab a glass of water from the sea.
No Whales in it, you say?
Oh, they mustn't exist then.

“In the Middle Ages people believed that the earth was flat, for which they had at least the evidence of their senses: we believe it to be round, not because as many as one percent of us could give the physical reasons for so quaint a belief, but because modern science has convinced us that nothing that is obvious is true, and that everything that is magical, improbable, extraordinary, gigantic, microscopic, heartless, or outrageous is scientific.”

~ George Bernard Shaw, Author, Playwright (1856-1950)
 
Last edited:
hes starting to lose the plot now
I knew he was into peeling contests but geez.
I'm assuming the simulation theory is causing some serious angst but for the life of me don't know why. except maybe it means the universe is flat,but hey.
 
I knew he was into peeling contests but geez.
I'm assuming the simulation theory is causing some serious angst but for the life of me don't know why. except maybe it means the universe is flat,but hey.

if you can just accept the world is not a simulation, the universe is infinite while simultaneously, we are : spinning, revolving, spiraling, shooting @

1000 +
67 000 +
500 000 +
670 000 000

miles p hour things would be a lot easier

KKpPtEd5aEVp3NenvCIEUe129YsN-KqPUOYhEWtI1QI.jpg
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Repeating something I heard isn't stealing. I didn't say I invented the theory. What seriously is your problem?
You've got no shame. You're entire knowledge on the topic comes from that one guys post of reddit. I asked you to explain the link in your own words, and you just word for word copied this guys post.

You did this because you don't have any idea what you're talking about. And I've been right about you this entire time. You're a troll or thick.

Unbelievable.
 
You've got no shame. You're entire knowledge on the topic comes from that one guys post of reddit. I asked you to explain the link in your own words, and you just word for word copied this guys post.

You did this because you don't have any idea what you're talking about. And I've been right about you this entire time. You're a troll or thick.

Unbelievable.

"explain computer codes found in string theory, multi-universe, quantum psychics in you own words"

lolz
 
"explain computer codes found in string theory, multi-universe, quantum psychics in you own words"

lolz
Why use quotations if you're not quoting anyone?

So we have one flat earther who doesn't use quotations when directly quoting someone else. And the other flat earther who uses quotations when he isn't quoting anyway.

What a team.
 
Why use quotations if you're not quoting anyone?

So we have one flat earther who doesn't use quotations when directly quoting someone else. And the other flat earther who uses quotations when he isn't quoting anyway.

What a team.

to paraphrase or give a summary of your comments

hilarious as per usual
 
to paraphrase or give a summary of your comments

hilarious as per usual
You know paraphrase doesn't mean make shit up, right?

There is a reason you didn't actually quote me, and it's because you know it would burst your bubble.


Below is my actual quote, followed by his reply. Bolded is the copy paste from reddit.
So, in your own words, can you explain how those five dot points fit the simulation theory perfectly? Without it just being that anything is possible if it's a simulation.
I'll go with entanglement seeing it means so much to you and you can figure the rest out for yourself seeing your the smart one round here and go the insult angle rather than scientific.
Entanglement is possible because the link between the particles is in a database and can be accessed immediately,like in software.I thought I explained this when I said the simulation sounds like a computer,when referencing it the first time,but apparently you need it spelled out.

I asked how the dot points he made connected to the simulation theory. He stated that they fit perfectly well, so I asked how. He didn't explain it at all, he narrowed it down to one point, and then he copy pasted someone else's opinion on it.

This all happened because he actually has no idea what he is talking about at anything more than a surface level.
 
You know paraphrase doesn't mean make shit up, right?

I asked you to explain the link in your own words

This all happened because he actually has no idea what he is talking about at anything more than a surface level.


i think you will find a very low percentage of humans have strong knowledge about computer codes in string theory including ... you
 
Relevance?

spooky action at a distance, cpu codes string theory, Quantum entanglement, the size of the universe, numbers of dimensions and the like are complicated topics '

it is dumb of you for bagging the person, for apparently not having insignificant understanding or quoting experts
 
spooky action at a distance, cpu codes string theory, the size of the universe, numbers of dimensions and the like are complicated topics '

it is dumb of you for bagging the person, for having insignificant understanding or quoting experts
He isn't quoting experts. He is quoting one post on reddit.

He stated that those dot points fit the simulation perfectly well. I asked him to explain how they fit, in his own words.

Are you telling me that you are unable to research a topic and talk about it in your own words?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

You've got no shame. You're entire knowledge on the topic comes from that one guys post of reddit. I asked you to explain the link in your own words, and you just word for word copied this guys post.

You did this because you don't have any idea what you're talking about. And I've been right about you this entire time. You're a troll or thick.

Unbelievable.
Yes,my whole life source of information comes from Red dot. You have some major issues man.
Your the troll,your just arguing with everyone and constantly saying troll and idiot.
You have no shame and there is something majority not functioning.
 
Yes,my whole life source of information comes from Red dot. You have some major issues man.
I didn't say that. I pointed out that your entire knowledge about this simulation stuff comes from that reddit post that I linked. That I found because you copy pasted from it, pretending it was your own work.

Your the troll,your just arguing with everyone and constantly saying troll and idiot.
No, I've pointed out that there are only two options for you to be posting the way that you are. Either you are trolling, or you're not very intelligent.
You have no shame and there is something majority not functioning.
And you now pretend to slip back into english being your second language.

I'm bored with you. You provide nothing except other peoples work, and you don't even understand it.
Gonna ignore you.
 
He isn't quoting experts. He is quoting one post on reddit.

He stated that those dot points fit the simulation perfectly well. I asked him to explain how they fit, in his own words.

Are you telling me that you are unable to research a topic and talk about it in your own words?
I didn't copy out the whole thing and I never said I invented the theory. Why are you so petrified on this theory
 
I didn't say that. I pointed out that your entire knowledge about this simulation stuff comes from that reddit post that I linked. That I found because you copy pasted from it, pretending it was your own work.


No, I've pointed out that there are only two options for you to be posting the way that you are. Either you are trolling, or you're not very intelligent.

And you now pretend to slip back into english being your second language.

I'm bored with you. You provide nothing except other peoples work, and you don't even understand it.
Gonna ignore you.
Your world might not be as round as you've studied or want it to be,get over it,it still might be.
 
I didn't say that. I pointed out that your entire knowledge about this simulation stuff comes from that reddit post that I linked. That I found because you copy pasted from it, pretending it was your own work.


No, I've pointed out that there are only two options for you to be posting the way that you are. Either you are trolling, or you're not very intelligent.

And you now pretend to slip back into english being your second language.

I'm bored with you. You provide nothing except other peoples work, and you don't even understand it.
Gonna ignore you.
I agree that this conspiracy is one of the poorest ones around. It still doesn't mean you should be trying to trick someone up. Anyone who keeps asking others to put stuff in their own words is trying to win an argument based on their levels of intelligence. Poor form.
 
I agree that this conspiracy is one of the poorest ones around. It still doesn't mean you should be trying to trick someone up. Anyone who keeps asking others to put stuff in their own words is trying to win an argument based on their levels of intelligence. Poor form.
Fair enough. But is there a point to arguing with someone who doesn't actually know what they're even talking about, let alone what they are cut/pasting from a random blogger?

Might point before all of this, is that putting equal weighting on the oblate spheroid earth, and any other random thought bubble, is intellectually dishonest.

He kept seeming to insist that there is equal evidence. I pointed out that there isn't, and it's just that he either doesn't understand, or he is trolling.

He put up a few dot points and said they fit perfectly well with simulation. I asked him to explain how they fit. Not a huge leap in reasoning, surely?
He responded with a meaningless copy paste and told me to work out the rest.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Fair enough. But is there a point to arguing with someone who doesn't actually know what they're even talking about, let alone what they are cut/pasting from a random blogger?

Might point before all of this, is that putting equal weighting on the oblate spheroid earth, and any other random thought bubble, is intellectually dishonest.

He kept seeming to insist that there is equal evidence. I pointed out that there isn't, and it's just that he either doesn't understand, or he is trolling.

He put up a few dot points and said they fit perfectly well with simulation. I asked him to explain how they fit. Not a huge leap in reasoning, surely?
He responded with a meaningless copy paste and told me to work out the rest.

This is bloody ridiculous in the 21st century some really uneducated idiots here. I have flown from Vancouver to Tokyo in just over 10 hours. Do people even think before they post? :drunk:
 
This is bloody ridiculous in the 21st century some really uneducated idiots here. I have flown from Vancouver to Tokyo in just over 10 hours. Do people even think before they post? :drunk:
Awesome word salad. No idea what your point is.
 
Just assumed you were arguing against me.
Your point flew straight over my head!
Lol nah mate, sometimes i get carried away with some banter, i dont mean to be abusive.

If you are flying qatar airways tokyo london, it takes 10 plus hours from tokyo to reach doha and another 7 hours from doha to london. Reaching canada from tokyo in 10 hours simply wouldnt be possible.
 
This is bloody ridiculous in the 21st century some really uneducated idiots here. I have flown from Vancouver to Tokyo in just over 10 hours. Do people even think before they post? :drunk:

there are many cases of planes making 'emergency landings' like such examples when a women has given birth prematurely - at places further away on the globe map than the original destination which is a closer distance

it would have only made sense for the pilot to go to that emergency landing location on a flat model ..
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom